Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJAMA network open

Public Perceptions of Timeliness for AI Use and Human Oversight.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York.
  2. 2Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  3. 3Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
  4. 4Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  5. 5Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Abstract

This cross-sectional study assesses perceptions on use of artificial intelligence (AI) for medical patient portal messaging and mental health support, with opinions stratified by birth generation.

Related

  1. Balancing Timely Access and Human Oversight in Patient-Facing Artificial Intelligence—Waiting for the Human in the Loop
    Felix Busch, Dennis M. Hedderich
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Meaningful oversight of medical AI beyond human in the loop
    Davy van de Sande, Nicoleta Economou-Zavlanos, Michel E. van Genderen
    npj Digital MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text29 citedEpidemiology & public healthOpenAlex
  3. Operationalizing independent oversight in large-scale public health cohorts: Monitoring protocol for the NIMHANS–NH–SKAN Stroke project
    Mutharaju Arelingaiah, Arpitha Arun, Bangalore Sivilan Madhuri +17
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Systems & synthetic biologyEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  4. From clinician review to measurable human oversight of AI-drafted paediatric discharge documents
    D. Morquin, G. Bochu, L. Robert +7
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. Global public perceptions of participation in pandemic and non-pandemic trials in the intensive care unit: a cross-sectional survey across 13 countries
    Leanne M. C. Hays, Alex C. Sherry, Attia Fatima +42
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{benda2026public,
  title = {{Public Perceptions of Timeliness for AI Use and Human Oversight.}},
  author = {Natalie C Benda and Uday Suresh and Afra Shamnath and Isabella Buitron and Megan E Salwei and Laurie Lovett Novak and Xuhai Xu and Meghan Reading Turchioe},
  journal = {JAMA network open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39048},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42873502},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Public Perceptions of Timeliness for AI Use and Human Oversight.
AU  - Natalie C Benda
AU  - Uday Suresh
AU  - Afra Shamnath
AU  - Isabella Buitron
AU  - Megan E Salwei
AU  - Laurie Lovett Novak
AU  - Xuhai Xu
AU  - Meghan Reading Turchioe
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - JAMA network open
DO  - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39048
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42873502
AB  - This cross-sectional study assesses perceptions on use of artificial intelligence (AI) for medical patient portal messaging and mental health support, with opinions stratified by birth generation.
SN  - 2574-3805
ER  -