Multicriteria assessment of cropping systems under contrasted soil fertility managements: evidence from mixed farming in the Madagascar highlands
Abstract
Agricultural intensification by smallholder farmers in Madagascar often combines conventional and agroecological practices. Assessing the performance of these practices through a multicriteria approach is essential to capture their economic, environmental and social performance. This study aimed to assess how the adoption of different cropping systems based on agroecological principles performs across sustainability indicators. We used survey data from 455 farmers to characterize and select 9 cropping systems across upland and lowland areas. A set of 11 indicators were chosen to represent systems' performances and perform field-scale evaluation, while addressing issues at farm and territory levels. Results revealed that most cropping systems exhibited trade-offs among indicators, suggesting that agroecology may not perform optimally across all indicators. Crop rotations had better environmental performance but were less effective in terms of social indicators, particularly labor. Monocropping systems performed better in terms of labor minimization, but not economically. Results also showed that crop choice within the cropping system had a greater influence on sustainability than fertilization type for a given crop. The study revealed key constraints associated with current practices, and which indicators should be used at farm and territory scale to assess ex ante the agroecological practices scaling out potential.
Related
- Genomic prediction of single cross families of perennial ryegrass under two nitrogen managements
- Egg fertility assessment system using deep learning technology.
- Primary Pyogenic Ventriculitis in Adults: A Retrospective Case Series of Clinical Characteristics, Cerebrospinal Fluid Parameters, and Surgical Drain Managements
- ContrasTED: contrastive domain embeddings for scalable remote homology classification
- Winter warming and agricultural plant diversification promote ground beetles and spiders with contrasted functional thermal responses
BibTeX
@article{razafindratsima2026multicriteria,
title = {{Multicriteria assessment of cropping systems under contrasted soil fertility managements: evidence from mixed farming in the Madagascar highlands}},
author = {Antso Ny Aina Amboarasoa Razafindratsima and Krishna Naudin and David Berre and Mathieu Vigne and Anne Périnelle and Sitrakiniaina Raharimalala and Fitahiana Andriandrovola and Müller Bertrand and Tantely Razafimbelo},
journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1080/14735903.2026.2719965},
url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05732568v1},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Multicriteria assessment of cropping systems under contrasted soil fertility managements: evidence from mixed farming in the Madagascar highlands
AU - Antso Ny Aina Amboarasoa Razafindratsima
AU - Krishna Naudin
AU - David Berre
AU - Mathieu Vigne
AU - Anne Périnelle
AU - Sitrakiniaina Raharimalala
AU - Fitahiana Andriandrovola
AU - Müller Bertrand
AU - Tantely Razafimbelo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/26
JO - International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
DO - 10.1080/14735903.2026.2719965
UR - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05732568v1
AB - Agricultural intensification by smallholder farmers in Madagascar often combines conventional and agroecological practices. Assessing the performance of these practices through a multicriteria approach is essential to capture their economic, environmental and social performance. This study aimed to assess how the adoption of different cropping systems based on agroecological principles performs across sustainability indicators. We used survey data from 455 farmers to characterize and select 9 cropping systems across upland and lowland areas. A set of 11 indicators were chosen to represent systems' performances and perform field-scale evaluation, while addressing issues at farm and territory levels. Results revealed that most cropping systems exhibited trade-offs among indicators, suggesting that agroecology may not perform optimally across all indicators. Crop rotations had better environmental performance but were less effective in terms of social indicators, particularly labor. Monocropping systems performed better in terms of labor minimization, but not economically. Results also showed that crop choice within the cropping system had a greater influence on sustainability than fertilization type for a given crop. The study revealed key constraints associated with current practices, and which indicators should be used at farm and territory scale to assess ex ante the agroecological practices scaling out potential.
SN - 1473-5903
ER -