Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Prediction of fast, slow, and average shear-wave velocities from well logs using artificial neural networks and statistical regression

Abstract

Accurate estimation of fast, slow, and average shear-wave velocities (Vs Fast , Vs Slow , and Vs Average ) is important for evaluating reservoir anisotropy, fracture networks, and stress regimes. In this study, multivariate statistical regression and artificial neural network (ANN) models were developed and compared to predict these velocity components in a well from the Sarvak Formation, Zagros Basin, Iran. The initial dataset comprised 3,234 depth points, of which 2,264 valid points were retained after data preprocessing and normalization. Compressional-wave velocity (Vp), neutron porosity (NPHI), and bulk density (RHOB) were used as input variables. For the statistical models, 70% of the data were used for calibration and 30% for testing, whereas the ANN employed a feedforward backpropagation architecture trained using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, with 70, 15, and 15% of the data allocated to training, validation, and testing, respectively. The statistical models achieved test-set R² values of 0.769129, 0.616225, and 0.725904 for Vs fast , Vs slow and Vs Average , respectively, while the corresponding ANN models achieved R² values of 0.786769, 0.641601, and 0.727609. The ANN therefore provided modest improvements over statistical regression, with the largest improvement observed for Vs Fast and Vs slow . Minor discrepancies at lower velocity ranges may reflect local geological complexities, including intense fracturing. Overall, the proposed approach, particularly the ANN models, provides a practical indirect method for estimating shear-wave velocity components from conventional well logs and may support reservoir characterization where direct dipole-shear measurements are unavailable.

Related

  1. Mapping soil salinity and prediction uncertainty across different depths using quantile regression forests
    Huarong Zhang, Dashan Han, Xiao Wang
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  2. Time Series Fuzzy Bayesian Logistic Regression for Wildfire Event Prediction
    Georgios Charizanos, Haydar Demirhan, Duygu Icen
    Earth and Space SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
  3. Optimization of UV-C irradiation time for biologically treated saline wastewater using artificial neural networks and a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework
    Mohammadnabi Omidvar, Farshad Farahbod
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  4. WP-MIP: An Artificial Intelligence, Hybrid, and Physically Based Model Intercomparison Project for Weather Prediction
    Ron McTaggart‐Cowan, Linus Magnusson, Inna Polichtchouk +57
    Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text6 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyOpenAlex
  5. Trends in soil organic carbon prediction research using geospatial technologies and artificial intelligence: an exploratory bibliometric analysis (2005-2025)
    Elhoussaine Khaddi, Hafida Zaher, Hafida Naim
    Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{teymouri2026prediction,
  title = {{Prediction of fast, slow, and average shear-wave velocities from well logs using artificial neural networks and statistical regression}},
  author = {Hamed Teymouri and Ramin Nikrouz and Aliasghar Ciabeghodsi and Ali Kadkhodaie},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-72419-9},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-72419-9},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prediction of fast, slow, and average shear-wave velocities from well logs using artificial neural networks and statistical regression
AU  - Hamed Teymouri
AU  - Ramin Nikrouz
AU  - Aliasghar Ciabeghodsi
AU  - Ali Kadkhodaie
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-72419-9
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-72419-9
AB  - Accurate estimation of fast, slow, and average shear-wave velocities (Vs Fast , Vs Slow , and Vs Average ) is important for evaluating reservoir anisotropy, fracture networks, and stress regimes. In this study, multivariate statistical regression and artificial neural network (ANN) models were developed and compared to predict these velocity components in a well from the Sarvak Formation, Zagros Basin, Iran. The initial dataset comprised 3,234 depth points, of which 2,264 valid points were retained after data preprocessing and normalization. Compressional-wave velocity (Vp), neutron porosity (NPHI), and bulk density (RHOB) were used as input variables. For the statistical models, 70% of the data were used for calibration and 30% for testing, whereas the ANN employed a feedforward backpropagation architecture trained using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, with 70, 15, and 15% of the data allocated to training, validation, and testing, respectively. The statistical models achieved test-set R² values of 0.769129, 0.616225, and 0.725904 for Vs fast , Vs slow and Vs Average , respectively, while the corresponding ANN models achieved R² values of 0.786769, 0.641601, and 0.727609. The ANN therefore provided modest improvements over statistical regression, with the largest improvement observed for Vs Fast and Vs slow . Minor discrepancies at lower velocity ranges may reflect local geological complexities, including intense fracturing. Overall, the proposed approach, particularly the ANN models, provides a practical indirect method for estimating shear-wave velocity components from conventional well logs and may support reservoir characterization where direct dipole-shear measurements are unavailable.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -