Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPathology oncology research : POR

Prognosis and tumor grading in bladder urothelial carcinomas with intratumoral grade heterogeneity.

  1. 1Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ordu University, Ordu, Türkiye.
  2. 2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
  3. 3Department of Pathology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.

Abstract

Aims

Grade heterogeneity is one of the most debated issues in the grading of urothelial carcinomas. The 2022 WHO classification states that approximately one-third of urothelial carcinomas exhibit grade heterogeneity and suggests that the presence of ≥5% high-grade component may justify classification as high-grade. Nevertheless, the need for further evidence was also emphasized. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the high-grade component in urothelial carcinomas with grade heterogeneity and to determine a threshold value for high-grade proportion that is clinically meaningful for grading.Methods

This retrospective study included 180 cases of non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma with grade heterogeneity, diagnosed between January 2019 and August 2022 on TUR specimens, with available clinical data. Recurrence and survival time were assessed. Cases with >90% high-grade component were excluded.Results

Recurrence was observed in 26.7% of cases. The two-year survival rate was 73.3%. While no significant association was found between recurrence and the proportion of high-grade component, survival time significantly decreased as the proportion of high-grade component increased. ROC curve analysis identified 27.5% as the cut-off value associated with adverse prognosis.Conclusion

In non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinomas, the proportion of high-grade component showed a strong association with survival. Together with literature findings, our results suggest that a threshold higher than 5% may be more appropriate for assigning tumors to the high-grade category. Nonetheless, risk stratification incorporating tumor size and extent remains essential for prognostic evaluation.

Related

  1. Multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging-based habitat imaging for preoperative prediction of histological grade and prognosis in soft tissue sarcoma: focusing on intratumoral heterogeneity
    Chunlian Chen, Jie Zhou, Zesheng Zhang +10
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  2. An explainable machine learning model combining intratumoral and peritumoral computed tomography radiomics with maximum standard uptake value for predicting International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer grading and prognosis in stage I pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma.
    Hanzhe Wang, Junping Lan, Yimin Chen +11
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  3. Prognosis and Therapies in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas.
    Trilok Shrivastava, Yusra Medik, Nikhila Sampath Kumar +2
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  4. FGFR 1–3 Alteration Frequency in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer and Its Effect on Prognosis
    Dilek Çağlayan, Emine Göktaş, Makbule Nihan Somuncu +10
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Hybrid grading systems improve progression risk stratification in non‐invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma and support a histomorphological continuum of disease progression
    Jane K Nguyen, Marcello P Toscano, Jianbo Li +14
    HistopathologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
BibTeX
@article{alkan2026prognosis,
  title = {{Prognosis and tumor grading in bladder urothelial carcinomas with intratumoral grade heterogeneity.}},
  author = {Gökhan Veli Alkan and Kutsal Doğan and Meltem Türk Alkan and Evrim Önder},
  journal = {Pathology oncology research : POR},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/pore.2026.1612553},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898355},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prognosis and tumor grading in bladder urothelial carcinomas with intratumoral grade heterogeneity.
AU  - Gökhan Veli Alkan
AU  - Kutsal Doğan
AU  - Meltem Türk Alkan
AU  - Evrim Önder
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Pathology oncology research : POR
DO  - 10.3389/pore.2026.1612553
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898355
AB  - Aims  Grade heterogeneity is one of the most debated issues in the grading of urothelial carcinomas. The 2022 WHO classification states that approximately one-third of urothelial carcinomas exhibit grade heterogeneity and suggests that the presence of ≥5% high-grade component may justify classification as high-grade. Nevertheless, the need for further evidence was also emphasized. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the high-grade component in urothelial carcinomas with grade heterogeneity and to determine a threshold value for high-grade proportion that is clinically meaningful for grading.Methods  This retrospective study included 180 cases of non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma with grade heterogeneity, diagnosed between January 2019 and August 2022 on TUR specimens, with available clinical data. Recurrence and survival time were assessed. Cases with >90% high-grade component were excluded.Results  Recurrence was observed in 26.7% of cases. The two-year survival rate was 73.3%. While no significant association was found between recurrence and the proportion of high-grade component, survival time significantly decreased as the proportion of high-grade component increased. ROC curve analysis identified 27.5% as the cut-off value associated with adverse prognosis.Conclusion  In non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinomas, the proportion of high-grade component showed a strong association with survival. Together with literature findings, our results suggest that a threshold higher than 5% may be more appropriate for assigning tumors to the high-grade category. Nonetheless, risk stratification incorporating tumor size and extent remains essential for prognostic evaluation.
SN  - 1219-4956
SN  - 1532-2807
ER  -