Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,761 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Prognostic performance of the WIfI classification in diabetic patients with infrapopliteal CLTI after endovascular revascularization: a subgroup analysis of the PRIME-WIFI registry

7 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
  2. 2Department of Vascular Surgery, Liyuan Hospital Affiliated Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology
  3. 3Department of Vascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
  4. 4Department of Vascular Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University
  5. 5Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
  6. 6Department of Vascular Surgery, The Affiliated Qingdao Hiser Hospital of Qingdao University
  7. 7Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University

Abstract

Introduction: The Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification is widely used in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, its prognostic performance in diabetic patients after endovascular revascularization remains unclear. We evaluated its prognostic and discriminatory performance in this population.

Methods: This subgroup analysis of the prospective, multicenter PRIME-WIFI registry included diabetic patients with infrapopliteal CLTI undergoing endovascular revascularization. Associations between baseline WIfI stage and MAE (all-cause mortality, major amputation, or clinically driven target-limb reintervention), its individual components, amputation-free survival, clinical improvement, and 12-month VascuQoL change were assessed using Kaplan–Meier, multivariable Cox, and Harrell's C-index analyses.

Results: A total of 707 diabetic patients (730 limbs) were analyzed; in the full PRIME-WIFI cohort, diabetes status showed a borderline interaction with WIfI stage for MAE ( P for interactio n = 0.083). One-year freedom from MAE decreased across WIfI stages (89.5%, 77.4%, 78.0%, and 70.1% for stages 1–4; log-rank P = 0.004), and WIfI stage independently predicted MAE (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.09–1.56; P = 0.0031). One-year AFS was 94.7%, 83.3%, 83.3%, and 74.2% (log-rank P = 0.0003), with higher WIfI stage associated with worse AFS (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.24–1.89; P < 0.001). Overall survival was 94.7%, 87.8%, 86.1%, and 80.3% (log-rank P = 0.009), and WIfI stage was independently associated with mortality (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.20–1.94; P < 0.001). Freedom from major amputation was 100.0%, 95.3%, 96.8%, and 92.3% (log-rank P = 0.02), with higher WIfI stage independently associated with major amputation (HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.07–2.57; P = 0.020). In contrast, freedom from CD-TLR did not differ significantly across stages (log-rank P = 0.60; HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.68–1.23; P = 0.564). Clinical improvement tended to decrease with increasing WIfI stage but did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.053). VascuQoL scores improved from baseline to 12 months across all WIfI stages, with no significant difference in the magnitude of improvement among stages (time-by-WIfI interaction P = 0.247).

Conclusions: In this diabetic subgroup, WIfI retained prognostic value for MAE, AFS, mortality, and major amputation. However, discrimination was clearest between stages 1 and 4, with limited separation between stages 2 and 3. These findings support WIfI for broad risk stratification while highlighting the need for complementary assessment in diabetic CLTI.

Related

  1. Predictors of Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization After Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Chronic Total Occlusions
    Busra Guvendi Sengor, Barkın Kultursay, Mehmet Sengor +5
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Early Versus Delayed Endovascular Revascularization: Implications for Limb Salvage and Survival After Transmetatarsal Amputation
    Ashkan Yahyavi, Leen Hussein, Zakarias H. Shishehbor +3
    Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMCEurope PMC
  3. Hybrid surgical thromboembolectomy and crossover endovascular revascularization for acute lower-limb ischemia in a patient with active ovarian cancer receiving a PARP inhibitor (fuzuloparib): a case report and literature review
    Yibiao Jiang, Gang Wang, Zhenbin Liu +2
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Prognostic Impact of Diabetes Status on Outcomes After Physiology-Guided Revascularization ― Insights From the J-PRIDE Registry ―
    Masahiro Takeo, Shoichi Kuramitsu, Hiroki Okabe +29
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaJ-STAGE
  5. Social-biological misalignment modulates the prognostic impact of infarct volume after endovascular thrombectomy
    Yongbo Liu, Chunguang Chen, Chengbao Yang
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeurologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{zheng2026prognostic,
  title = {{Prognostic performance of the WIfI classification in diabetic patients with infrapopliteal CLTI after endovascular revascularization: a subgroup analysis of the PRIME-WIFI registry}},
  author = {Henan Zheng and Julong Guo and Fan Zhang and Zhu Tong and Zibo Feng and Ziheng Wu and Meng Ye and Chunshui He and Qiang Li and Xin Fang and Lianrui Guo},
  journal = {Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1984270},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1984270/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prognostic performance of the WIfI classification in diabetic patients with infrapopliteal CLTI after endovascular revascularization: a subgroup analysis of the PRIME-WIFI registry
AU  - Henan Zheng
AU  - Julong Guo
AU  - Fan Zhang
AU  - Zhu Tong
AU  - Zibo Feng
AU  - Ziheng Wu
AU  - Meng Ye
AU  - Chunshui He
AU  - Qiang Li
AU  - Xin Fang
AU  - Lianrui Guo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1984270
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1984270/full
AB  - Introduction: The Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification is widely used in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, its prognostic performance in diabetic patients after endovascular revascularization remains unclear. We evaluated its prognostic and discriminatory performance in this population.  Methods: This subgroup analysis of the prospective, multicenter PRIME-WIFI registry included diabetic patients with infrapopliteal CLTI undergoing endovascular revascularization. Associations between baseline WIfI stage and MAE (all-cause mortality, major amputation, or clinically driven target-limb reintervention), its individual components, amputation-free survival, clinical improvement, and 12-month VascuQoL change were assessed using Kaplan–Meier, multivariable Cox, and Harrell's C-index analyses.  Results: A total of 707 diabetic patients (730 limbs) were analyzed; in the full PRIME-WIFI cohort, diabetes status showed a borderline interaction with WIfI stage for MAE ( P for interactio n = 0.083). One-year freedom from MAE decreased across WIfI stages (89.5%, 77.4%, 78.0%, and 70.1% for stages 1–4; log-rank P = 0.004), and WIfI stage independently predicted MAE (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.09–1.56; P = 0.0031). One-year AFS was 94.7%, 83.3%, 83.3%, and 74.2% (log-rank P = 0.0003), with higher WIfI stage associated with worse AFS (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.24–1.89; P < 0.001). Overall survival was 94.7%, 87.8%, 86.1%, and 80.3% (log-rank P = 0.009), and WIfI stage was independently associated with mortality (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.20–1.94; P < 0.001). Freedom from major amputation was 100.0%, 95.3%, 96.8%, and 92.3% (log-rank P = 0.02), with higher WIfI stage independently associated with major amputation (HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.07–2.57; P = 0.020). In contrast, freedom from CD-TLR did not differ significantly across stages (log-rank P = 0.60; HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.68–1.23; P = 0.564). Clinical improvement tended to decrease with increasing WIfI stage but did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.053). VascuQoL scores improved from baseline to 12 months across all WIfI stages, with no significant difference in the magnitude of improvement among stages (time-by-WIfI interaction P = 0.247).  Conclusions: In this diabetic subgroup, WIfI retained prognostic value for MAE, AFS, mortality, and major amputation. However, discrimination was clearest between stages 1 and 4, with limited separation between stages 2 and 3. These findings support WIfI for broad risk stratification while highlighting the need for complementary assessment in diabetic CLTI.
SN  - 2297-055X
ER  -