Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Remote Monitoring After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Single-Centre Feasibility Study with Retrospective Wound Image Classification
6 affiliations
- 1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, 40-635 Katowice, Poland
- 2Department of Cardiac Surgery, Upper Silesian Medical Center, Ziołowa 45/47, 40-635 Katowice, Poland
- 3Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, 40-635 Katowice, Poland
- 4Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Upper Silesian Medical Center, 40-635 Katowice, Poland
- 5Institute of Theoretical and Applied Informatics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
- 6First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-635 Katowice, Poland
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Unplanned readmission within 30 days affects 12–20% of patients after cardiac surgery, largely through complications developing at home. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and adherence of a 30-day post-discharge remote monitoring programme. In a separate retrospective analysis that did not inform patient care, we also assessed how accurately an investigational AI-based classifier triages the programme’s wound photographs. Methods: In this prospective single-centre study, 76 of 85 screened patients were monitored for 30 days with twice-daily blood pressure and pulse, daily weight, electrocardiography (ECG), and alternate-day wound photographs, all reviewed daily by a study clinician. Retrospectively, 735 photographs of 88 wounds from 71 patients, labelled by two blinded clinicians, were used to train an ensemble of five convolutional neural networks, tested on a patient-disjoint test set of 147 images from 15 patients. Results: All 76 eligible patients enrolled and 75 (99%) completed the programme, with 82% adherence to the core measurements and an acceptability score of 6.3 (SD 0.5) of 7. Daily review produced 494 teleconsultations, 10 emergency referrals, and 6 admissions (7.9%), and atrial fibrillation was confirmed in 18 episodes in 11 patients. Agreement between the two wound labelling clinicians was κ 0.89. On the test set, the classifier achieved an area under the precision–recall curve of 0.747 (95% CI 0.402–1.000), image-level sensitivity 73.3% (11/15; 95% CI 33.3–100%), precision 73.3%, and wound-level sensitivity 5/6; the one confirmed wound complication in the test set was flagged. Conclusions: Intensive remote monitoring with daily clinician review was feasible after cardiac surgery and was sustained by patients. Daily review identified arrhythmias and wound problems, most of which were managed remotely or in the outpatient clinic. The classifier is a proof of concept for automated triage of such photographs by reproducing clinicians’ visual judgment; given the wide confidence intervals, larger multicentre validation is needed.
Related
- Conversational diagnostic artificial intelligence in ambulatory primary care: a prospective feasibility study
- Generative Artificial Intelligence in Periodontology: Application of OpenAI Models for the Classification of Periodontitis and Risk Assessment in Patients Undergoing Supportive Periodontal Care
- An explainable artificial intelligence system for prognostic assessment and decision support in diabetic foot ulcer care: a multicentre derivation and validation study with prospective randomised evaluation
- Artificial intelligence-assisted smartphone thermal imaging for pedicled facial and head-neck flaps: An exploratory feasibility study using ΔT-based proxy perfusion grading.
- Rational Drug Use Support System: design, artificial intelligence integration, and pilot feasibility trial.
BibTeX
@article{bis2026artificial,
title = {{Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Remote Monitoring After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Single-Centre Feasibility Study with Retrospective Wound Image Classification}},
author = {Jarosław Bis and Kinga Gościńska-Bis and Łukasz Morkisz and Mikołaj Jodłowski and Przemysław Sekuła and Michał Cholewa and Krystian Wita and Marta Strugała and Ryszard Bachowski and Radosław Gocoł},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15218288},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8288},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Remote Monitoring After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Single-Centre Feasibility Study with Retrospective Wound Image Classification
AU - Jarosław Bis
AU - Kinga Gościńska-Bis
AU - Łukasz Morkisz
AU - Mikołaj Jodłowski
AU - Przemysław Sekuła
AU - Michał Cholewa
AU - Krystian Wita
AU - Marta Strugała
AU - Ryszard Bachowski
AU - Radosław Gocoł
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/24
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15218288
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8288
AB - Background/Objectives: Unplanned readmission within 30 days affects 12–20% of patients after cardiac surgery, largely through complications developing at home. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and adherence of a 30-day post-discharge remote monitoring programme. In a separate retrospective analysis that did not inform patient care, we also assessed how accurately an investigational AI-based classifier triages the programme’s wound photographs. Methods: In this prospective single-centre study, 76 of 85 screened patients were monitored for 30 days with twice-daily blood pressure and pulse, daily weight, electrocardiography (ECG), and alternate-day wound photographs, all reviewed daily by a study clinician. Retrospectively, 735 photographs of 88 wounds from 71 patients, labelled by two blinded clinicians, were used to train an ensemble of five convolutional neural networks, tested on a patient-disjoint test set of 147 images from 15 patients. Results: All 76 eligible patients enrolled and 75 (99%) completed the programme, with 82% adherence to the core measurements and an acceptability score of 6.3 (SD 0.5) of 7. Daily review produced 494 teleconsultations, 10 emergency referrals, and 6 admissions (7.9%), and atrial fibrillation was confirmed in 18 episodes in 11 patients. Agreement between the two wound labelling clinicians was κ 0.89. On the test set, the classifier achieved an area under the precision–recall curve of 0.747 (95% CI 0.402–1.000), image-level sensitivity 73.3% (11/15; 95% CI 33.3–100%), precision 73.3%, and wound-level sensitivity 5/6; the one confirmed wound complication in the test set was flagged. Conclusions: Intensive remote monitoring with daily clinician review was feasible after cardiac surgery and was sustained by patients. Daily review identified arrhythmias and wound problems, most of which were managed remotely or in the outpatient clinic. The classifier is a proof of concept for automated triage of such photographs by reproducing clinicians’ visual judgment; given the wide confidence intervals, larger multicentre validation is needed.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -