Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCEndocrine oncology (Bristol, England)

Geographic Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes of Adrenocortical Carcinoma in the Americas: A Narrative Review.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Clinical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo , São Paulo, Brazil.
  2. 2Endocrine Oncology Section, Developmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH) , Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  3. 3Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo , Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  4. 4Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto , São Paulo, Brazil.
  5. 5Division of Endocrinology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (HC-FMUSP) , São Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract

Objective

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy of the adrenal cortex. Given the heterogeneity of healthcare systems across the Americas, this review examines regional differences in access to diagnosis, treatment availability, and clinical outcomes, as well as their association with structural and socioeconomic factors.Design

Narrative literature review of observational studies and relevant regional evidence.Methods

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were investigated for studies published between 2010 and 2025 reporting on diagnostic resources, treatment availability, clinical outcomes, or ACC-related population-specific genetic epidemiology across the Americas and the Caribbean. Due to substantial heterogeneity in study design, populations, and outcome measures, results were synthesized narratively and organized by geographic region and thematic domain.Results

Available evidence, particularly from the United States, indicates greater representation of high-volume referral centers, specialized multidisciplinary care, and structured diagnostic and treatment pathways. Conversely, reports from selected settings in Central and South America and the Caribbean describe limitations related to healthcare funding, fragmented care networks, and access to specialized therapies. These differences may be associated with diagnostic delays and reduced access to specialized treatment; however, the strength, depth, and comparability of the available evidence vary substantially across regions.Conclusions

Available evidence indicates regional variation in ACC diagnosis, treatment access, and reported outcomes across the Americas. Structural, socioeconomic, and geographic factors may contribute to these differences. Potential priorities include strengthening referral pathways, expanding specialized care, and supporting multidisciplinary management. More representative data are needed to enable robust regional comparisons and guide context-specific strategies.

Related

  1. Primary pulmonary NUT carcinoma: pathological features, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis — An extended review
    Shan Wu, Miao Zhang, Hui Wang
    Oncology reviewsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. A Giant 5000 g Primary Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.
    Sadin Zahra, Aghajanzadeh Manouchehr, Mohammad Reza Sadin +5
    Clinical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. Adjuvant Therapy in Resected Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Patient Selection
    Lina Pedraza Sanchez, Guilherme Rabinowits, Elio Monsour +1
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  4. Systemic Therapies in Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Current Standards, Emerging Strategies, and Practical Considerations
    Lina Pedraza Sanchez, Prerna Dogra, Elio Monsour +1
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Temporal variation in initial UICC stage and post-diagnostic treatment intervals in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma in Saxony before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Gerald Stach, Günter Lauer, Samaneh Farahzadi +2
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{tanaka2026geographic,
  title = {{Geographic Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes of Adrenocortical Carcinoma in the Americas: A Narrative Review.}},
  author = {Hugo Tanaka and George I Karadimov and María Laura Iglesias and Mariano Dioca and Luis Eduardo C Pinto and Sonir R Antonini and Maria C B V Fragoso and Jaydira Del Rivero},
  journal = {Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1530/eo-26-0043},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42847807},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Geographic Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes of Adrenocortical Carcinoma in the Americas: A Narrative Review.
AU  - Hugo Tanaka
AU  - George I Karadimov
AU  - María Laura Iglesias
AU  - Mariano Dioca
AU  - Luis Eduardo C Pinto
AU  - Sonir R Antonini
AU  - Maria C B V Fragoso
AU  - Jaydira Del Rivero
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)
DO  - 10.1530/eo-26-0043
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42847807
AB  - Objective  Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy of the adrenal cortex. Given the heterogeneity of healthcare systems across the Americas, this review examines regional differences in access to diagnosis, treatment availability, and clinical outcomes, as well as their association with structural and socioeconomic factors.Design  Narrative literature review of observational studies and relevant regional evidence.Methods  PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were investigated for studies published between 2010 and 2025 reporting on diagnostic resources, treatment availability, clinical outcomes, or ACC-related population-specific genetic epidemiology across the Americas and the Caribbean. Due to substantial heterogeneity in study design, populations, and outcome measures, results were synthesized narratively and organized by geographic region and thematic domain.Results  Available evidence, particularly from the United States, indicates greater representation of high-volume referral centers, specialized multidisciplinary care, and structured diagnostic and treatment pathways. Conversely, reports from selected settings in Central and South America and the Caribbean describe limitations related to healthcare funding, fragmented care networks, and access to specialized therapies. These differences may be associated with diagnostic delays and reduced access to specialized treatment; however, the strength, depth, and comparability of the available evidence vary substantially across regions.Conclusions  Available evidence indicates regional variation in ACC diagnosis, treatment access, and reported outcomes across the Americas. Structural, socioeconomic, and geographic factors may contribute to these differences. Potential priorities include strengthening referral pathways, expanding specialized care, and supporting multidisciplinary management. More representative data are needed to enable robust regional comparisons and guide context-specific strategies.
SN  - 2634-4793
ER  -