Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCancers

Recent Developments in Studies on the Relation Between Endometriosis and Ovarian Cancer: Phenotype-Specific Risk, Molecular Convergence and Clinical Risk Stratification.

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Mother and Child, 01-211 Warsaw, Poland.
  2. 22nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.
  3. 3Women's Health Research Institute, Calisia University, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland.
  4. 4OVIklinika Infertility Center, 01-377 Warsaw, Poland.
  5. 5Department of Population Medicine and Lifestyle Diseases Prevention, University of Białystok, 15-269 Białystok, Poland.
  6. 6Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, 03-242 Warsaw, Poland.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: We aim to synthesize recent clinical and translational evidence on the relationship between endometriosis and ovarian cancer, with emphasis on publications from 2024 to 2026 and on clinically conservative risk stratification. Materials and Methods: This state-of-the-art narrative review prioritizes major peer-reviewed publications from July 2024 to June 2026. Older landmark publications were used only where necessary to contextualize recent findings. Results: Recent evidence supports a selective, phenotype-dependent association instead of a generalized malignant potential of endometriosis. The strongest and most reproducible signal concerns epithelial ovarian cancer, especially clear-cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, with the highest relative risks reported for ovarian endometrioma and/or deep endometriosis. The ENDOCANCER meta-analysis found increased ovarian cancer risk across odds ratio, hazard ratio and standardized incidence ratio estimates but confirmed low absolute incidence and substantial heterogeneity. Contemporary reviews, including Leone Roberti Maggiore et al. and Bogani et al., emphasize low absolute lifetime risk and the absence of evidence supporting universal oncologic surveillance. Newer clinicopathological studies distinguish endometriosis-correlated tumors supported by transitional lesions indicative of malignant transformation from incidental coexistence. Molecular data support biological plausibility through ARID1A, PIK3CA, KRAS, PTEN, mismatch repair deficiency, POLE-mutated disease and p53-abnormal phenotypes, but these markers are not ready for routine prediction in endometriosis care. Conclusions: The immediate clinical implication is individualized risk assessment in place of routine cancer screening or prophylactic surgery based solely on the increased cancer risk associated with endometriosis. Counseling should integrate endometriosis phenotype, age, menopausal status, lesion dynamics, imaging atypia, hereditary cancer risk, reproductive goals and surgical consequences.

Related

  1. Two Faces of the Same Thrombus: Molecular Phenotypes of Thromboinflammation in Acute Pulmonary Embolism and the Path to Phenotype-Guided Risk Stratification
    Hugo Hyung Bok Yoo
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: Molecular Mechanisms and Evidence-Based Clinical Management
    Kai-Jung Chang, Tsung-Hsuan Lai
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Toward Precision Colorectal Cancer Screening: Integrating Clinical Risk Stratification, Molecular Biomarkers, and Artificial Intelligence
    Sorinel Lunca, Stefan Morarasu, Gabriel Mihail Dimofte
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Radiomics-based machine learning models decipher heterogeneity of anoikis-related molecular subtypes for prognostic stratification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Linyong Wu, Dayou Wei, Wubiao Chen +4
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Molecular stratification of SPOP-mutant prostate cancer demonstrates Wnt signaling and replication stress signatures in diverse patient populations
    Kinza Rizwan, Sai Prasada Rao Manikonda, Heidi Dowst +8
    Cell ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{gutowska2026recent,
  title = {{Recent Developments in Studies on the Relation Between Endometriosis and Ovarian Cancer: Phenotype-Specific Risk, Molecular Convergence and Clinical Risk Stratification.}},
  author = {Klaudia Gutowska and Aleksandra Urban and Cezary Wojtyła and Sławomir Ławicki and Piotr Laudański},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18193241},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882935},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Recent Developments in Studies on the Relation Between Endometriosis and Ovarian Cancer: Phenotype-Specific Risk, Molecular Convergence and Clinical Risk Stratification.
AU  - Klaudia Gutowska
AU  - Aleksandra Urban
AU  - Cezary Wojtyła
AU  - Sławomir Ławicki
AU  - Piotr Laudański
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18193241
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882935
AB  - Background/Objectives: We aim to synthesize recent clinical and translational evidence on the relationship between endometriosis and ovarian cancer, with emphasis on publications from 2024 to 2026 and on clinically conservative risk stratification. Materials and Methods: This state-of-the-art narrative review prioritizes major peer-reviewed publications from July 2024 to June 2026. Older landmark publications were used only where necessary to contextualize recent findings. Results: Recent evidence supports a selective, phenotype-dependent association instead of a generalized malignant potential of endometriosis. The strongest and most reproducible signal concerns epithelial ovarian cancer, especially clear-cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, with the highest relative risks reported for ovarian endometrioma and/or deep endometriosis. The ENDOCANCER meta-analysis found increased ovarian cancer risk across odds ratio, hazard ratio and standardized incidence ratio estimates but confirmed low absolute incidence and substantial heterogeneity. Contemporary reviews, including Leone Roberti Maggiore et al. and Bogani et al., emphasize low absolute lifetime risk and the absence of evidence supporting universal oncologic surveillance. Newer clinicopathological studies distinguish endometriosis-correlated tumors supported by transitional lesions indicative of malignant transformation from incidental coexistence. Molecular data support biological plausibility through ARID1A, PIK3CA, KRAS, PTEN, mismatch repair deficiency, POLE-mutated disease and p53-abnormal phenotypes, but these markers are not ready for routine prediction in endometriosis care. Conclusions: The immediate clinical implication is individualized risk assessment in place of routine cancer screening or prophylactic surgery based solely on the increased cancer risk associated with endometriosis. Counseling should integrate endometriosis phenotype, age, menopausal status, lesion dynamics, imaging atypia, hereditary cancer risk, reproductive goals and surgical consequences.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -