AnterioR-Posterior VErsuS Anterior-LaTeral defibrillator pAd position in out of hospital cardiac aRresT
- 1Welsh Ambulance Services University Trust
Abstract
BackgroundEarly defibrillation is a key factor of survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In the United Kingdom, initial anterior-lateral (AL) defibrillator pad placement is standard practice. However, anterior-posterior (AP) pad positioning has been proposed as a method of improving current flow through the myocardium particularly in cases of refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF). Concerns remain regarding potential delays to defibrillation associated with alternative pad placement strategies and the practical application of AP positioning.
ObjectiveWe conducted two consecutive simulation studies to explore whether there is a difference in the time taken to apply defibrillator pads, and placement accuracy, between AP and AL positions during simulated OHCA.
MethodsThis research study comprised of two simulation studies. First, we evaluated pad placement accuracy before and after written instruction showing optimal pad placement (RESTART-SIM accuracy). Second, we undertook a randomised crossover examining time to pad placement, timing to successful pad application was recorded for each attempt (RESTART-SIM speed).
ResultsRESTART-SIM (accuracy) out of 14 participants 50% correctly placed AL pads and 14% correctly placed AP pads initially. Following provision of guidance this increased to 93% for AL but remained at 14% for AP placement.
9 participants completed RESTART-SIM (speed). Mean AP pad placement time was 14.2 seconds and standard deviation of 2.64, compared with 10.6 seconds for AL placement and a standard deviation of 4.24. AP first strategy mean placement time was 15.3 seconds and mean AL placement time was 11.5 seconds. In AL first mean AP placement time was 12.8 seconds and mean AL placement time was 9.6 seconds.
ConclusionAP pad placement whilst slower than AL placement the time difference of 4 seconds is unlikely to be clinically significant. However, without guidance, both AL and AP placements were often inaccurate. After a guidance picture AL placement was increased but AP remained poorly placed.
Related
- Apparent absence of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus with chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency and a medial meniscal ramp lesion: a case report
- Lateral Tibial Posterior Slope Induces Anterior Tibial Translation While Lateral-Medial Slope Difference Induces Internal Rotation: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study
- Salvage Management of Anterior-Posterior Compression (APC) Type II Pelvic Ring Injury Using Isolated Posterior Fixation After Anterior Implant Removal: A Case Report
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction With Lateral Meniscal Repair With and Without Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Prospective Comparative Study of Functional and Rotational Outcomes
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Modified Multi-Tooth Posterior Maxillary Alveolar Segment Infracture Without a Lateral Window for Staged Implant Placement: A Prospective Case Series
BibTeX
@misc{colbourne2026anteriorposterior,
title = {{AnterioR-Posterior VErsuS Anterior-LaTeral defibrillator pAd position in out of hospital cardiac aRresT}},
author = {A. Colbourne and T. Dart and C. D. Deakin and K. Couper and C. M. Smith and S. Davies and K. Hawley and H. Pocock and J. Miller and L. Williams and S. Price and N. Rees},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.24.26361176},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.24.26361176v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - AnterioR-Posterior VErsuS Anterior-LaTeral defibrillator pAd position in out of hospital cardiac aRresT
AU - A. Colbourne
AU - T. Dart
AU - C. D. Deakin
AU - K. Couper
AU - C. M. Smith
AU - S. Davies
AU - K. Hawley
AU - H. Pocock
AU - J. Miller
AU - L. Williams
AU - S. Price
AU - N. Rees
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/24
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.24.26361176
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.24.26361176v1
AB - BackgroundEarly defibrillation is a key factor of survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In the United Kingdom, initial anterior-lateral (AL) defibrillator pad placement is standard practice. However, anterior-posterior (AP) pad positioning has been proposed as a method of improving current flow through the myocardium particularly in cases of refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF). Concerns remain regarding potential delays to defibrillation associated with alternative pad placement strategies and the practical application of AP positioning. ObjectiveWe conducted two consecutive simulation studies to explore whether there is a difference in the time taken to apply defibrillator pads, and placement accuracy, between AP and AL positions during simulated OHCA. MethodsThis research study comprised of two simulation studies. First, we evaluated pad placement accuracy before and after written instruction showing optimal pad placement (RESTART-SIM accuracy). Second, we undertook a randomised crossover examining time to pad placement, timing to successful pad application was recorded for each attempt (RESTART-SIM speed). ResultsRESTART-SIM (accuracy) out of 14 participants 50% correctly placed AL pads and 14% correctly placed AP pads initially. Following provision of guidance this increased to 93% for AL but remained at 14% for AP placement. 9 participants completed RESTART-SIM (speed). Mean AP pad placement time was 14.2 seconds and standard deviation of 2.64, compared with 10.6 seconds for AL placement and a standard deviation of 4.24. AP first strategy mean placement time was 15.3 seconds and mean AL placement time was 11.5 seconds. In AL first mean AP placement time was 12.8 seconds and mean AL placement time was 9.6 seconds. ConclusionAP pad placement whilst slower than AL placement the time difference of 4 seconds is unlikely to be clinically significant. However, without guidance, both AL and AP placements were often inaccurate. After a guidance picture AL placement was increased but AP remained poorly placed.
ER -