Untangling EIT Waves: What a Measured Speed Actually Traces
Abstract
Nearly three decades after the first SOHO/EIT observations, reported EUV-wave speeds still range from a few tens to more than 1000 km/s. This Perspective asks what those numbers actually trace. A measured image speed depends on passband and line-of-sight weighting, cadence, difference imaging, the selected crest or leading edge, propagation sector, fitted interval, and projection geometry. Same-event comparisons quantify this observation-operator effect. In events common to the Nitta and Muhr analyses, early or fastest-sector measurements were typically higher; five of six directly shared events differed by about 30%. For 19 May 2007, the 171 Angstrom peak speed was 475 +/- 47 km/s, compared with 238 +/- 20 km/s in 304 Angstrom, while the 171 Angstrom cadence was four times faster than the 195 Angstrom cadence. A sampling audit of the 1 April 2017 SWAP event shows that a repeated speed near 834 km/s is almost exactly one 91.6-Mm radial ring per 110-s image interval. In a reconstructed 3 April sector, AIA 171 Angstrom gives about 405 km/s, compared with the published SWAP mean of 484 km/s; an independently selected AIA 193 Angstrom ridge gives about 250 km/s under strongly shortened exposures. Such differences are not automatic evidence for different MHD modes. A same-event energy pilot separates compact-source heating, dimming/ejecta, and one weak-compression front segment. The current data do not justify a universal power law, but define a falsifiable question: is the fraction of released energy carried by the front scale invariant from compact quiet-Sun events to global waves and shocks? Establishing this dependence would show which eruption scales can contribute materially to coronal heating.
Related
- Untangling Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals and Massive Black Hole Binaries in LISA Data
- Untangling Similarities and Differences in Star Formation Histories Across Cosmological Simulations
- Identity Crisis: Untangling Mass-Ordering Artifacts from Compact-Object Pairing in Gravitational-Wave Populations
- Untangling dust emission and cosmic infrared background anisotropies with the scattering transform statistics
- Activity in White Dwarf Debris Disks II: WISE Mission Traces a Decade of Disk Evolution and Persistence
BibTeX
@misc{podladchikova2026untangling,
title = {{Untangling EIT Waves: What a Measured Speed Actually Traces}},
author = {Olena Podladchikova},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.10167},
eprint = {2609.10167},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10167},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Untangling EIT Waves: What a Measured Speed Actually Traces
AU - Olena Podladchikova
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/09
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.10167
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10167
AB - Nearly three decades after the first SOHO/EIT observations, reported EUV-wave speeds still range from a few tens to more than 1000 km/s. This Perspective asks what those numbers actually trace. A measured image speed depends on passband and line-of-sight weighting, cadence, difference imaging, the selected crest or leading edge, propagation sector, fitted interval, and projection geometry. Same-event comparisons quantify this observation-operator effect. In events common to the Nitta and Muhr analyses, early or fastest-sector measurements were typically higher; five of six directly shared events differed by about 30%. For 19 May 2007, the 171 Angstrom peak speed was 475 +/- 47 km/s, compared with 238 +/- 20 km/s in 304 Angstrom, while the 171 Angstrom cadence was four times faster than the 195 Angstrom cadence. A sampling audit of the 1 April 2017 SWAP event shows that a repeated speed near 834 km/s is almost exactly one 91.6-Mm radial ring per 110-s image interval. In a reconstructed 3 April sector, AIA 171 Angstrom gives about 405 km/s, compared with the published SWAP mean of 484 km/s; an independently selected AIA 193 Angstrom ridge gives about 250 km/s under strongly shortened exposures. Such differences are not automatic evidence for different MHD modes. A same-event energy pilot separates compact-source heating, dimming/ejecta, and one weak-compression front segment. The current data do not justify a universal power law, but define a falsifiable question: is the fraction of released energy carried by the front scale invariant from compact quiet-Sun events to global waves and shocks? Establishing this dependence would show which eruption scales can contribute materially to coronal heating.
ER -