Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Calibration of AlphaGenome Variant Impact and SpliceAI2 scores as PP3/BP4 evidence for missense, non-coding, and synonymous variants

  1. 1Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Genetics, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

Computational predictions can serve as graded evidence in variant classification after calibration. We calibrated the AlphaGenome Variant Impact score (AVI) for missense variants and for six non-coding and synonymous classes, and SpliceAI2 for the six classes. For missense variants, AVI reached evidence between moderate and strong in both directions but did not outperform its component AlphaMissense. AVI reached strong pathogenic evidence in the three classes adjacent to exons. It reached moderate evidence, the highest estimable level, in proximal introns and at other synonymous sites, and supporting evidence, at an unstable threshold, in deep introns. SpliceAI2 reached the same levels, except one level lower at near-canonical positions and none in deep introns. No reached level failed validation on later ClinVar classifications, although 14 of 30 benign levels were not tested. With population variants as controls, both tools reached supporting and moderate pathogenic evidence in all six classes, at stricter thresholds near exons and at other synonymous sites, and at lower thresholds in proximal and deep introns. ClinVar likely benign classifications changed about 60-fold in number at 20 nucleotides from the exon without a change in measured splicing. AVI, a genome-wide score, did not differ detectably in discrimination from the splicing-specific SpliceAI2 in four classes; SpliceAI2 discriminated better in two classes and in a splicing assay, and was more sensitive at 99% specificity in four classes. Both scores provide calibrated evidence for non-coding and synonymous variants, but thresholds depend on whether ClinVar benign classifications or population variants are used for comparison.

Related

  1. Beyond a single threshold: calibration of CADD v1.7 and AlphaGenome for ACMG/AMP computational evidence across variant classes, model versions, and reference data
    J. P. Miranda, L. Carvajal, I. Aldana +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  2. MetaDome 2027: a comprehensively updated resource for aggregating missense variant evidence across homologous human protein domains
    L. Wiel, F. Ferraro, J. Yu +19
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  3. Analysis of single nucleotide substitution in CYP21A2 gene using Alphagenome
    A. Matveeva, Y. Xu, A. V. Pandey
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  4. AlphaGenome informed machine learning for pathogenicity prediction of germline mutations
    P. Kumar, S. Singh, S. Garai +8
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. A Rare Homozygous Synonymous Variant in the ECM1 Gene in a Lipoid Proteinosis Patient.
    Metehan Simsek, Husna Topcu, Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk +5
    Beyoglu eye journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{babazade2026calibration,
  title = {{Calibration of AlphaGenome Variant Impact and SpliceAI2 scores as PP3/BP4 evidence for missense, non-coding, and synonymous variants}},
  author = {A. Babazade and Y. Dolas and T. Duzenli and O. Vural and C. Furtana and M. A. Ergun},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.21.760715},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.21.760715v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Calibration of AlphaGenome Variant Impact and SpliceAI2 scores as PP3/BP4 evidence for missense, non-coding, and synonymous variants
AU  - A. Babazade
AU  - Y. Dolas
AU  - T. Duzenli
AU  - O. Vural
AU  - C. Furtana
AU  - M. A. Ergun
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.21.760715
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.21.760715v1
AB  - Computational predictions can serve as graded evidence in variant classification after calibration. We calibrated the AlphaGenome Variant Impact score (AVI) for missense variants and for six non-coding and synonymous classes, and SpliceAI2 for the six classes. For missense variants, AVI reached evidence between moderate and strong in both directions but did not outperform its component AlphaMissense. AVI reached strong pathogenic evidence in the three classes adjacent to exons. It reached moderate evidence, the highest estimable level, in proximal introns and at other synonymous sites, and supporting evidence, at an unstable threshold, in deep introns. SpliceAI2 reached the same levels, except one level lower at near-canonical positions and none in deep introns. No reached level failed validation on later ClinVar classifications, although 14 of 30 benign levels were not tested. With population variants as controls, both tools reached supporting and moderate pathogenic evidence in all six classes, at stricter thresholds near exons and at other synonymous sites, and at lower thresholds in proximal and deep introns. ClinVar likely benign classifications changed about 60-fold in number at 20 nucleotides from the exon without a change in measured splicing. AVI, a genome-wide score, did not differ detectably in discrimination from the splicing-specific SpliceAI2 in four classes; SpliceAI2 discriminated better in two classes and in a splicing assay, and was more sensitive at 99% specificity in four classes. Both scores provide calibrated evidence for non-coding and synonymous variants, but thresholds depend on whether ClinVar benign classifications or population variants are used for comparison.
ER  -