Computational simulation reveals the critical role of spike-timing-dependent plasticity in synchrony
- 1University of Toronto
Abstract
Emerging research on desynchronization reveals strong relations to memory formation and recollection with much of the evidence originating from studies of the hippocampus, a brain region central to memory processing. However, growing evidence emphasizing the role of desynchronization is accompanied by challenges, most notably the synchronization/desynchronization conundrum. The conundrum arises from an apparent contradiction between learning and Shannon's information theory: spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) acquires information via synchronized populational activity whereas information theory suggests that information channel is encoded through higher variability. Both frameworks are well-founded. Learning is widely accepted as the mathematical abstraction of STDP while Shannon's information theory showcases its power ubiquitously across fields from communication systems to neuroscience. Here, we propose that learning and Shannon's information theory are not necessarily opposing principles. Rather, learning plays a critical role in the process of synchronization and desynchronization. To justify our claim, we conduct computational simulations based on a Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal model coupled with NMDA, AMPA, and GABA synapses with inputs of biologically realistic spiking data. Our results show that enabling STDP significantly influences synchronization and desynchronization dynamics. Specifically, we find that STDP and desynchronization form a regulatory loop, in which STDP regulates the level of synchrony, and synchrony regulates subsequent learning strength. Further study reveals STDP is capable of switching neurons from synchronization to desynchronization. This framework mitigates the synchronization/desynchronization conundrum by clarifying the relationship between desynchronization and learning, and offers a new perspective on how synchrony contributes to memory formation and recollection.
Related
- Friend advice influences mate choice through brain-to-brain synchrony and computational decision processes
- Upregulation of Calbindin in Adult Inhibitory Neurons Reactivates Critical Period Plasticity in Mouse Visual Cortex
- Regional spatial synchrony in density-dependent survival of a woodland passerine
- Cue-dependent fear learning drives nucleus accumbens spine plasticity
- Sensory plasticity of dorsal horn silent neurons as a critical mechanism for neuropathic pain
BibTeX
@misc{huang2026computational,
title = {{Computational simulation reveals the critical role of spike-timing-dependent plasticity in synchrony}},
author = {Y. Huang and M. Lankarany and G. D'Eleuterio},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.27.747601},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.27.747601v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Computational simulation reveals the critical role of spike-timing-dependent plasticity in synchrony
AU - Y. Huang
AU - M. Lankarany
AU - G. D'Eleuterio
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/27
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.27.747601
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.27.747601v1
AB - Emerging research on desynchronization reveals strong relations to memory formation and recollection with much of the evidence originating from studies of the hippocampus, a brain region central to memory processing. However, growing evidence emphasizing the role of desynchronization is accompanied by challenges, most notably the synchronization/desynchronization conundrum. The conundrum arises from an apparent contradiction between learning and Shannon's information theory: spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) acquires information via synchronized populational activity whereas information theory suggests that information channel is encoded through higher variability. Both frameworks are well-founded. Learning is widely accepted as the mathematical abstraction of STDP while Shannon's information theory showcases its power ubiquitously across fields from communication systems to neuroscience. Here, we propose that learning and Shannon's information theory are not necessarily opposing principles. Rather, learning plays a critical role in the process of synchronization and desynchronization. To justify our claim, we conduct computational simulations based on a Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal model coupled with NMDA, AMPA, and GABA synapses with inputs of biologically realistic spiking data. Our results show that enabling STDP significantly influences synchronization and desynchronization dynamics. Specifically, we find that STDP and desynchronization form a regulatory loop, in which STDP regulates the level of synchrony, and synchrony regulates subsequent learning strength. Further study reveals STDP is capable of switching neurons from synchronization to desynchronization. This framework mitigates the synchronization/desynchronization conundrum by clarifying the relationship between desynchronization and learning, and offers a new perspective on how synchrony contributes to memory formation and recollection.
ER -