Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAnaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine

Hemoadsorption to prevent acute kidney injury in elective cardiac surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether intraoperative hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) improves postoperative outcomes compared with the standard of care. METHODS: We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing hemoadsorption versus standard care in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Data were analyzed using a frequentist approach and trial sequential analysis (TSA). The primary outcome was the incidence of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) within 7 days after surgery. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025634991). RESULTS: A total of six RCTs comprising 798 patients were included. Four RCTs (n = 723; 355 hemoadsorption, 368 control) reported CSA-AKI incidence, which did not significantly differ between groups (RR = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.71-1.21], p = 0.57; I² = 42.0%). Hemoadsorption was not associated with significant differences in secondary outcomes: interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor, 28-day mortality, SOFA score, and ICU length of stay. CONCLUSION: Hemoadsorption during CPB was not associated with a reduction in CSA-AKI or with improvement in secondary clinical outcomes in elective patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, the accrued sample represented only 48% of the heterogeneity-adjusted required information size (1,491 patients), and the cumulative Z-curve crossed neither the monitoring nor the futility boundary. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42025634991; January 31, 2025).

Related

  1. STRONG prehabilitation before elective ventral hernia repair: Learnings from recruitment challenges in a randomized controlled trial
    Sofie Anne-Marie Skovbo Jensen, Susanne Vahr Lauridsen, Siv Fonnes +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyClinical trials & evidence synthesisPLOSPMC
  2. Can physical exercise improve allergic rhinitis symptoms in adults? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Chi Ngai Lo, Bernard Pui Lam Leung, Felix Haobo Wang +2
    BMC Sports Science, Medicine and RehabilitationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textImmunologyPMC
  3. Hydrolyzed Rice Formula for the Management of Cow’s Milk Allergy in Infants and Young Children: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hania Szajewska, Elżbieta Jarocka-Cyrta, Agata Stróżyk +5
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Biologics and small molecules for perianal Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized placebo-controlled trials
    Yuhong Yuan, Vipul Jairath, Jurij Hanzel +7
    Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsPMC
  5. Placebo-arm response rates for pain outcomes in chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tareq Alsaleh, Prachi Mann, Aleena Majeed +2
    Frontiers in PhysiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePMC
BibTeX
@article{abouarab2026hemoadsorption,
  title = {{Hemoadsorption to prevent acute kidney injury in elective cardiac surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis}},
  author = {Osama Abou-Arab and Christophe Beyls and Azrat Ibrahima and Arvind Appa and Hamza Yaha Alshatri and Juliette Colombel and Said Kamel and Mouhamed Djahoum Moussa and Emmanuel Besnier and Khaled Saleh and Yazine Mahjoub and Jihad Mallat},
  journal = {Anaesthesia Critical Care \& Pain Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.accpm.2026.101931},
  url = {https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-05836831v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Hemoadsorption to prevent acute kidney injury in elective cardiac surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
AU  - Osama Abou-Arab
AU  - Christophe Beyls
AU  - Azrat Ibrahima
AU  - Arvind Appa
AU  - Hamza Yaha Alshatri
AU  - Juliette Colombel
AU  - Said Kamel
AU  - Mouhamed Djahoum Moussa
AU  - Emmanuel Besnier
AU  - Khaled Saleh
AU  - Yazine Mahjoub
AU  - Jihad Mallat
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine
DO  - 10.1016/j.accpm.2026.101931
UR  - https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-05836831v1
AB  - BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether intraoperative hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) improves postoperative outcomes compared with the standard of care. METHODS: We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing hemoadsorption versus standard care in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Data were analyzed using a frequentist approach and trial sequential analysis (TSA). The primary outcome was the incidence of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) within 7 days after surgery. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025634991). RESULTS: A total of six RCTs comprising 798 patients were included. Four RCTs (n = 723; 355 hemoadsorption, 368 control) reported CSA-AKI incidence, which did not significantly differ between groups (RR = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.71-1.21], p = 0.57; I² = 42.0%). Hemoadsorption was not associated with significant differences in secondary outcomes: interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor, 28-day mortality, SOFA score, and ICU length of stay. CONCLUSION: Hemoadsorption during CPB was not associated with a reduction in CSA-AKI or with improvement in secondary clinical outcomes in elective patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, the accrued sample represented only 48% of the heterogeneity-adjusted required information size (1,491 patients), and the cumulative Z-curve crossed neither the monitoring nor the futility boundary. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42025634991; January 31, 2025).
SN  - 2352-5568
ER  -