Health commodity resource allocation formula to achieve universal health coverage in Tanzania: a policy perspective
4 affiliations
- 1Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, PO Box 65015, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- 2Ministry of Health, PO Box 743, Dodoma, Tanzania
- 3Prime Minister’s Office Regional Administration and Local Government (PMO- RALG), PO Box 1923, Dodoma, Tanzania
- 4Medical Stores Department, PO Box 9081, Dodoma, Tanzania
Abstract
Background: Capitation formula funding is increasingly being adopted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) including Tanzania. The approach can address health system objectives of equity and efficiency especially when relevant risk adjustments to the capitation funding are made. This paper aimed at documenting the formula review process, identifying variables explaining current pharmaceutical expenditure by health facilities in Tanzania, and assessing their usefulness in allocating prospective health commodities funds.
Methods: We followed a six phased approach. First, the desk review determined possible variables and evaluated criteria for their selection. Second, stakeholders’ meetings reviewed the current allocation formula and risk adjusters for the new proposed formula. Third, Pearson’s correlation and multiple regression analysis assessed the usefulness of the proposed variables in allocating health commodities funds. Fourth, the stakeholder consensus and data-driven weighting were used to rank the relative importance of the variables. Fifth, scenario analysis using data from national health information system was done to test the functionality and implications of the new proposed formula. Finally, validation meetings were conducted with decision makers.
Results: A total of eight risk adjusters were chosen out of the probable 18 identified. Analysis indicated a significant robust correlation (P < 0.01) between per capita health commodities expenditure and all selected variables except antenatal care, which was moderately correlated. The variables explained 77% and 74% of the variation in per capita health commodities expenditure for the model with all primary health facilities (dispensaries, health centre and district hospitals) (PHC model, n = 145) and for the model with health centres and district hospitals (HC/DH model, n = 45), respectively.
Conclusion: Resource allocation formula review is a complex process especially in data constrained settings. Nevertheless, we demonstrated the extent to which data driven risk adjusters and basic methodologies can be applied to inform the process. Further analysis to compare funding level from the allocation formula to actual pharmaceutical expenditure would be useful.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00800-6.
Related
- Resource allocation efficiency and population alignment of community health centers: a home-based healthcare perspective
- 商品权属通证化:第三类标准化资产市场的形成逻辑与演化路径——以黄金数字凭证体系为切入点 Commodity Ownership Tokenization: Formation Logic and Evolution Path of the Third Category of Standardized Asset Market — A Perspective from the Digital Gold Voucher System
- Bridging energy and proteome allocation models allows prediction of the resource cost of traits across environments
- Fairness-Aware Resource Allocation for Timely Information Dissemination in C-V2X Networks
- Joint Vehicle Selection and Resource Allocation for Hierarchical Federated Learning in Internet of Vehicles
BibTeX
@article{ngalesoni2026health,
title = {{Health commodity resource allocation formula to achieve universal health coverage in Tanzania: a policy perspective}},
author = {Frida N. Ngalesoni and George M. Ruhago and Aneth W. Mutatina and Elias M. Katani and James T. Kengia and Abdallah A. Mushi and Daudi I. Msasi and Mavere A. Tukai},
journal = {Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation : C/E},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12962-026-00800-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00800-6},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Health commodity resource allocation formula to achieve universal health coverage in Tanzania: a policy perspective
AU - Frida N. Ngalesoni
AU - George M. Ruhago
AU - Aneth W. Mutatina
AU - Elias M. Katani
AU - James T. Kengia
AU - Abdallah A. Mushi
AU - Daudi I. Msasi
AU - Mavere A. Tukai
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/30
JO - Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation : C/E
DO - 10.1186/s12962-026-00800-6
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00800-6
AB - Background: Capitation formula funding is increasingly being adopted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) including Tanzania. The approach can address health system objectives of equity and efficiency especially when relevant risk adjustments to the capitation funding are made. This paper aimed at documenting the formula review process, identifying variables explaining current pharmaceutical expenditure by health facilities in Tanzania, and assessing their usefulness in allocating prospective health commodities funds. Methods: We followed a six phased approach. First, the desk review determined possible variables and evaluated criteria for their selection. Second, stakeholders’ meetings reviewed the current allocation formula and risk adjusters for the new proposed formula. Third, Pearson’s correlation and multiple regression analysis assessed the usefulness of the proposed variables in allocating health commodities funds. Fourth, the stakeholder consensus and data-driven weighting were used to rank the relative importance of the variables. Fifth, scenario analysis using data from national health information system was done to test the functionality and implications of the new proposed formula. Finally, validation meetings were conducted with decision makers. Results: A total of eight risk adjusters were chosen out of the probable 18 identified. Analysis indicated a significant robust correlation (P < 0.01) between per capita health commodities expenditure and all selected variables except antenatal care, which was moderately correlated. The variables explained 77% and 74% of the variation in per capita health commodities expenditure for the model with all primary health facilities (dispensaries, health centre and district hospitals) (PHC model, n = 145) and for the model with health centres and district hospitals (HC/DH model, n = 45), respectively. Conclusion: Resource allocation formula review is a complex process especially in data constrained settings. Nevertheless, we demonstrated the extent to which data driven risk adjusters and basic methodologies can be applied to inform the process. Further analysis to compare funding level from the allocation formula to actual pharmaceutical expenditure would be useful. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00800-6.
SN - 1478-7547
ER -