Speakers Use Indirect Language to Pursue Their Own Goals While Managing Social Relationships.
- 1Cognitive Science Institute, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
- 2Department of Language Science, University of California, Irvine, United States.
Abstract
We test three theories of the use and interpretation of indirect language by manipulating speaker interaction styles, focusing on an interpretation asymmetry that has puzzled philosophers and grammarians since Greek antiquity. We observe that negated evaluatively-positive (not happy) and evaluatively-negative (not sad) adjectives are interpreted asymmetrically for a speaker who regularly uses loopholes. Our results provide evidence that speakers use the loophole opened up by the indirectness of negation to plausibly deny an evaluatively-negative meaning. In contrast, the predicted interaction effects of competing politeness and Pollyanna-based theories are not borne out by our experiments. We interpret these results as evidence that loopholes are the key mechanism driving the asymmetric interpretation of negated statements. We also find evidence that hearers take into account that the speaker protects their own self-image rather than just mitigating a potential face-threat posed towards the hearer. Overall, our results suggest that speakers use indirect language to pursue their own goals while managing their social relationships.
Related
- Direct and Indirect Links Between Peer Relationships, Father Involvement and Self-Harm Among Rural Chinese Adolescents
- Negative Partner Perceptions as an Indirect Pathway Between Critical Adverse Experiences and Negative Communication in Adult Romantic Relationships
- Teacher-child relationships and preschool peer acceptance: a two wave longitudinal study of theory informed indirect pathways through emotion understanding and social initiative.
- The indirect association between psychological well-being and professional commitment through teacher self-efficacy among Turkish language teachers
- Extracting structure-activity relationships from patents with large language models.
BibTeX
@article{gotzner2026speakers,
title = {{Speakers Use Indirect Language to Pursue Their Own Goals While Managing Social Relationships.}},
author = {Nicole Gotzner and Gregory Scontras},
journal = {Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1162/opmi.a.388},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903995},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Speakers Use Indirect Language to Pursue Their Own Goals While Managing Social Relationships.
AU - Nicole Gotzner
AU - Gregory Scontras
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/05
JO - Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science
DO - 10.1162/opmi.a.388
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903995
AB - We test three theories of the use and interpretation of indirect language by manipulating speaker interaction styles, focusing on an interpretation asymmetry that has puzzled philosophers and grammarians since Greek antiquity. We observe that negated evaluatively-positive (not happy) and evaluatively-negative (not sad) adjectives are interpreted asymmetrically for a speaker who regularly uses loopholes. Our results provide evidence that speakers use the loophole opened up by the indirectness of negation to plausibly deny an evaluatively-negative meaning. In contrast, the predicted interaction effects of competing politeness and Pollyanna-based theories are not borne out by our experiments. We interpret these results as evidence that loopholes are the key mechanism driving the asymmetric interpretation of negated statements. We also find evidence that hearers take into account that the speaker protects their own self-image rather than just mitigating a potential face-threat posed towards the hearer. Overall, our results suggest that speakers use indirect language to pursue their own goals while managing their social relationships.
SN - 2470-2986
ER -