Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

The combination of simethicone and N-acetylcysteine in lidocaine ice popsicle compared with lidocaine ice popsicle alone in patients undergoing unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial

  1. 1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
  2. 2Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Abstract

Background: Optimal mucosal visualization is essential for high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), particularly for the detection of subtle upper gastrointestinal lesions. Oral simethicone and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) are commonly used to improve mucosal cleanliness, whereas lidocaine ice popsicles provide effective topical pharyngeal anesthesia for unsedated EGD. We evaluated whether incorporating simethicone and NAC into a lidocaine ice popsicle could improve mucosal visibility while maintaining patient comfort. Methods: This single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolled 374 adults undergoing unsedated diagnostic EGD between December 2024 and June 2025. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either a lidocaine ice popsicle containing simethicone (100 mg) and NAC (600 mg) or a conventional lidocaine ice popsicle. The primary outcome was mucosal visibility assessed using a modified Total Visibility Score (TVS). Secondary outcomes included procedure time, water volume required for mucosal cleansing, additional simethicone use, endoscopist satisfaction, ease of esophageal instrumentation, gag reflex, patient satisfaction, discomfort, pain, and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results: All 374 randomized participants (187 per group) completed the study and were analyzed according to their assigned groups. Baseline characteristics were descriptively similar between groups. The intervention group had a significantly lower TVS than the control group (6.19 ± 0.51 vs. 10.39 ± 2.22; mean difference, −4.20; 95% CI, −4.53 to −3.88; P < 0.001), indicating better mucosal visibility. Exploratory segment-specific analyses showed lower visibility scores in all six gastrointestinal segments. The intervention group also had higher endoscopist satisfaction, shorter procedure time (10.87 ± 1.44 vs. 12.75 ± 0.96 min; P < 0.001), lower water requirements for mucosal cleansing, and less frequent use of additional diluted simethicone during EGD (12.8% vs. 96.8%; P < 0.001). Exploratory analyses showed statistically significant differences in gag reflex and pain scores, although the absolute differences were small. Patient satisfaction, discomfort, and ease of esophageal instrumentation did not differ significantly between groups. No adverse events were observed during the defined observation period. Conclusions: The combined formulation of simethicone and N-acetylcysteine incorporated into a lidocaine ice popsicle improved mucosal visibility compared with a lidocaine ice popsicle alone during unsedated EGD and was associated with improved procedural efficiency. This integrated formulation may provide a practical approach to pre-endoscopic preparation by combining topical anesthesia with mucosal cleansing. Further multicenter studies are warranted to confirm its effectiveness, generalizability, and safety with longer follow-up. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20240606004

Related

  1. Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine in Patients With Dengue Fever With Marked Aminotransferase Elevation: Prospective Comparative Study.
    Huyen Thi Thu Nguyen, Lien Thi Tran, Hieu Thi Nguyen +2
    Interactive journal of medical researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  2. Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy of Vamha and Myrha in the Management of PMOS: An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicentre, Comparative, Prospective Clinical Study
    A. Patil, R. Barathe, D. M. Tate +7
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
  3. Prognostic Value of Early Weight Gain in Patients With Stage IV Gastric Cancer Undergoing First-Line Combination Immunotherapy.
    Kaihua Huang, Min Lai, Huiming Zhang +12
    Journal of gastric cancerPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Tip perfusion index for monitoring perioperative stress responses in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study
    Xiaolin Wang, Jingjing Zhang, Sufang Jiang +2
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety between liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine for paravertebral block in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung tumor surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{intarasangkhanawin2026combination,
  title = {{The combination of simethicone and N-acetylcysteine in lidocaine ice popsicle compared with lidocaine ice popsicle alone in patients undergoing unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial}},
  author = {Pailin Intarasangkhanawin and Saritphat Orrapin and Worapong Anuponganan and Neranchala Soonthornkes and Prasit Mahawongkajit},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0361495},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361495},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The combination of simethicone and N-acetylcysteine in lidocaine ice popsicle compared with lidocaine ice popsicle alone in patients undergoing unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial
AU  - Pailin Intarasangkhanawin
AU  - Saritphat Orrapin
AU  - Worapong Anuponganan
AU  - Neranchala Soonthornkes
AU  - Prasit Mahawongkajit
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0361495
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361495
AB  - Background: Optimal mucosal visualization is essential for high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), particularly for the detection of subtle upper gastrointestinal lesions. Oral simethicone and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) are commonly used to improve mucosal cleanliness, whereas lidocaine ice popsicles provide effective topical pharyngeal anesthesia for unsedated EGD. We evaluated whether incorporating simethicone and NAC into a lidocaine ice popsicle could improve mucosal visibility while maintaining patient comfort. Methods: This single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolled 374 adults undergoing unsedated diagnostic EGD between December 2024 and June 2025. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either a lidocaine ice popsicle containing simethicone (100 mg) and NAC (600 mg) or a conventional lidocaine ice popsicle. The primary outcome was mucosal visibility assessed using a modified Total Visibility Score (TVS). Secondary outcomes included procedure time, water volume required for mucosal cleansing, additional simethicone use, endoscopist satisfaction, ease of esophageal instrumentation, gag reflex, patient satisfaction, discomfort, pain, and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results: All 374 randomized participants (187 per group) completed the study and were analyzed according to their assigned groups. Baseline characteristics were descriptively similar between groups. The intervention group had a significantly lower TVS than the control group (6.19 ± 0.51 vs. 10.39 ± 2.22; mean difference, −4.20; 95% CI, −4.53 to −3.88; P < 0.001), indicating better mucosal visibility. Exploratory segment-specific analyses showed lower visibility scores in all six gastrointestinal segments. The intervention group also had higher endoscopist satisfaction, shorter procedure time (10.87 ± 1.44 vs. 12.75 ± 0.96 min; P < 0.001), lower water requirements for mucosal cleansing, and less frequent use of additional diluted simethicone during EGD (12.8% vs. 96.8%; P < 0.001). Exploratory analyses showed statistically significant differences in gag reflex and pain scores, although the absolute differences were small. Patient satisfaction, discomfort, and ease of esophageal instrumentation did not differ significantly between groups. No adverse events were observed during the defined observation period. Conclusions: The combined formulation of simethicone and N-acetylcysteine incorporated into a lidocaine ice popsicle improved mucosal visibility compared with a lidocaine ice popsicle alone during unsedated EGD and was associated with improved procedural efficiency. This integrated formulation may provide a practical approach to pre-endoscopic preparation by combining topical anesthesia with mucosal cleansing. Further multicenter studies are warranted to confirm its effectiveness, generalizability, and safety with longer follow-up. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20240606004
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -