Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,625 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

A Patient-Specific Framework for Separating Temporal Localization from Intracranial Waveform Reconstruction of Interictal Epileptiform Discharges from Scalp EEG

  1. 1Massachusetts General Hospital

Abstract

ObjectiveWe developed a patient-specific framework to determine which information about interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) can be recovered from scalp EEG, separating temporal localization ("where") from event-specific intracranial waveform reconstruction ("what").

MethodsSix subjects from a public simultaneous high-density scalp EEG and intracranial EEG (iEEG) dataset were analyzed using patient-specific dual-branch convolutional-attention models integrating waveform/topographic and time-frequency representations. For the where task, a 640-ms scalp EEG segment was divided into eight 80-ms bins, and the model predicted the bin containing the intracranial IED peak. For the what task, a 250-ms peak-centered iEEG waveform was represented as a fixed patient-specific template plus an event-specific residual predicted from scalp EEG. Direct scalp-input controls and event-clustered bootstrap confidence intervals were used to distinguish scalp-dependent information from template-driven performance.

ResultsWhere accuracy varied markedly across subjects (0.080-0.984), with an unweighted subject-level mean of 0.333 versus a chance level of 0.125; 95% confidence intervals were above chance level in three of six subjects. Input-control analyses supported a scalp-dependent contribution in subjects with successful localization. For the what task, mean waveform correlation was 0.752 for the model and 0.754 for the fixed patient-specific template (mean difference,-0.002), while residual correlations were generally modest (-0.020 to 0.378).

ConclusionScalp EEG contained recoverable temporal information in some subjects, but event-specific single-contact morphology was not consistently recovered beyond the patient-specific template. Separating temporal localization from template-based waveform reconstruction provides a more stringent framework for evaluating noninvasive-to-intracranial inference and reduces conflation of prior-driven similarity with input-dependent reconstruction.

Related

  1. TMS timed to interictal epileptiform discharges
    Matilda Makkonen, Olli-Pekka Kahilakoski, Miguel Menchaca +9
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  2. Conditional spatial classification of expert-confirmed interictal epileptiform discharge epochs: An EEG-ECG ablation and SHAP analysis
    Al Mukshit Plabon, Abdul Mukit, Md. Neyamul +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePhysiologyPLOS
  3. Report-derived interictal epileptiform discharge burden is associated with 7-day antiseizure medication decisions after pediatric video electroencephalography
    Fengming Zhu, Weidong Xu, Yun Gao +2
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeurologyCrossref
  4. Contribution of ictal-interictal SPECT and SISCOM to preoperative localization of the epileptogenic zone in frontal lobe epilepsy
    Lauro Wichert-Ana, Ricardo Fernandes Amaral, Jaqueline Cardena Fernandes +11
    Radiologia brasileiraPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Interictal functional ultrasound imaging in human epilepsy resection and responsive neurostimulation surgery
    K. A. Agyeman, D. Lee, B. P. Lee +7
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurologymedRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{matsubara2026patientspecific,
  title = {{A Patient-Specific Framework for Separating Temporal Localization from Intracranial Waveform Reconstruction of Interictal Epileptiform Discharges from Scalp EEG}},
  author = {T. Matsubara and R. Koda and M. Richardson and S. Stufflebeam},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.25.26364055},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.25.26364055v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Patient-Specific Framework for Separating Temporal Localization from Intracranial Waveform Reconstruction of Interictal Epileptiform Discharges from Scalp EEG
AU  - T. Matsubara
AU  - R. Koda
AU  - M. Richardson
AU  - S. Stufflebeam
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.25.26364055
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.25.26364055v1
AB  - ObjectiveWe developed a patient-specific framework to determine which information about interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) can be recovered from scalp EEG, separating temporal localization ("where") from event-specific intracranial waveform reconstruction ("what").  MethodsSix subjects from a public simultaneous high-density scalp EEG and intracranial EEG (iEEG) dataset were analyzed using patient-specific dual-branch convolutional-attention models integrating waveform/topographic and time-frequency representations. For the where task, a 640-ms scalp EEG segment was divided into eight 80-ms bins, and the model predicted the bin containing the intracranial IED peak. For the what task, a 250-ms peak-centered iEEG waveform was represented as a fixed patient-specific template plus an event-specific residual predicted from scalp EEG. Direct scalp-input controls and event-clustered bootstrap confidence intervals were used to distinguish scalp-dependent information from template-driven performance.  ResultsWhere accuracy varied markedly across subjects (0.080-0.984), with an unweighted subject-level mean of 0.333 versus a chance level of 0.125; 95% confidence intervals were above chance level in three of six subjects. Input-control analyses supported a scalp-dependent contribution in subjects with successful localization. For the what task, mean waveform correlation was 0.752 for the model and 0.754 for the fixed patient-specific template (mean difference,-0.002), while residual correlations were generally modest (-0.020 to 0.378).  ConclusionScalp EEG contained recoverable temporal information in some subjects, but event-specific single-contact morphology was not consistently recovered beyond the patient-specific template. Separating temporal localization from template-based waveform reconstruction provides a more stringent framework for evaluating noninvasive-to-intracranial inference and reduces conflation of prior-driven similarity with input-dependent reconstruction.
ER  -