Reversing in situ crop genetic diversity loss through incentive-based conservation
Abstract
Crop genetic diversity underpins the adaptive capacity of food systems but is declining. Maintaining diversity is challenging because most crop varieties underperform the best-suited ones under current conditions, therefore the private value of currently low-yielding varieties to farmers is limited. However they may carry traits that become critical as conditions change, so their public value as a genetic resource is large and long-term. Payments for Agrobiodiversity Conservation Services (PACS) – adapted from Payments for Ecosystem Services – aims to address this disparity by compensating farmers’ opportunity cost of conserving declining landraces. Here we provide the first counterfactual evaluation of a PACS scheme, using competitive bidding to allocate community conservation contracts among 461 farmers. We focus on enset (Ensete ventricosum), a staple food for over 20 million Ethiopians, which is almost entirely absent from ex situ collections. Of 141 enset landraces, 70% were threatened and 26% locally extinct. Using two complementary difference-in-differences designs we show that, relative to controls, PACS increased richness by 4.9 landraces per household, doubling typical farm diversity, and increased the number of households cultivating contracted landraces tenfold. Rather than crowding out non-contracted landraces, PACS improved their conservation status, with larger gains in communities with a greater share of contracted landraces. This indicates motivational crowding in, with PACS delivering conservation gains beyond those paid for. Scaling average compensation (US$8.46 per household) suggests that securing threatened enset diversity nationally would require US$141,000-640,000, <0.1% of Ethiopia’s agriculture and food security budget. PACS offers a cost-effective, scalable strategy for in situ agrobiodiversity conservation.
Related
- Behavioural Diversity of Fishes: Concepts, Drivers and Its Role in Conservation and Management
- Genome-wide diversity and Pinna rudis admixture reveal Thau lagoon as a conservation reservoir for the collapsing fan mussel Pinna nobilis
- Genetic and morphological insights reveal the hidden and colorful diversity in Oscarella sponges
- Plant genetic and root‐associated microbial diversity modulate Lactuca sativa responsiveness to a soil inoculum under phosphate deficiency
- Impact of selective logging on the population dynamics and genetic diversity in the neotropical timber tree Dicorynia guianensis
BibTeX
@misc{jago2026reversing,
title = {{Reversing in situ crop genetic diversity loss through incentive-based conservation}},
author = {Sophie Caitlin Jago and Asaminew Woldegebriel and Bezawit Genanaw and Ben Balmford and Robert J. Smith and Adam Drucker and Wendawek Abebe and James S. Borrell},
howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.32942/x2n10v},
url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15561/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Reversing in situ crop genetic diversity loss through incentive-based conservation
AU - Sophie Caitlin Jago
AU - Asaminew Woldegebriel
AU - Bezawit Genanaw
AU - Ben Balmford
AU - Robert J. Smith
AU - Adam Drucker
AU - Wendawek Abebe
AU - James S. Borrell
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
PB - EcoEvoRxiv
DO - 10.32942/x2n10v
UR - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15561/
AB - Crop genetic diversity underpins the adaptive capacity of food systems but is declining. Maintaining diversity is challenging because most crop varieties underperform the best-suited ones under current conditions, therefore the private value of currently low-yielding varieties to farmers is limited. However they may carry traits that become critical as conditions change, so their public value as a genetic resource is large and long-term. Payments for Agrobiodiversity Conservation Services (PACS) – adapted from Payments for Ecosystem Services – aims to address this disparity by compensating farmers’ opportunity cost of conserving declining landraces. Here we provide the first counterfactual evaluation of a PACS scheme, using competitive bidding to allocate community conservation contracts among 461 farmers. We focus on enset (Ensete ventricosum), a staple food for over 20 million Ethiopians, which is almost entirely absent from ex situ collections. Of 141 enset landraces, 70% were threatened and 26% locally extinct. Using two complementary difference-in-differences designs we show that, relative to controls, PACS increased richness by 4.9 landraces per household, doubling typical farm diversity, and increased the number of households cultivating contracted landraces tenfold. Rather than crowding out non-contracted landraces, PACS improved their conservation status, with larger gains in communities with a greater share of contracted landraces. This indicates motivational crowding in, with PACS delivering conservation gains beyond those paid for. Scaling average compensation (US$8.46 per household) suggests that securing threatened enset diversity nationally would require US$141,000-640,000, <0.1% of Ethiopia’s agriculture and food security budget. PACS offers a cost-effective, scalable strategy for in situ agrobiodiversity conservation.
ER -