Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Cardiac belief updating from volatile physiological afferents

  1. 1Aarhus University

Abstract

Cardiac interoception is commonly assessed by comparing subjective estimates of heart rate with physiological measurements. But beliefs can easily obscure these measures, such that they cannot readily distinguish sensitivity to afferent signals from the influence of prior expectations; this ultimately challenges the notion that behaviours under these tasks could reflect interoceptive processes at all. Here, we develop a computational framework that uses naturally occurring heart rate variability to quantify how strongly perceptual beliefs are updated by physiological evidence. We formalise interoception as weighted Bayesian updating under the joint influence of expectations and afferents, and derive a new measure, cardiac interoceptive sensitivity, that quantifies the extent to which beliefs move with incoming signals. Applying this to the largest Heart Rate Discrimination dataset to date (n=549), a task providing robust estimates of cardiac beliefs, we find that sensitivity is weak in the healthy population, but shows large interindividual differences, with 43% of the participants exhibiting behaviours at least minimally compatible with interoceptive processing. These findings challenge the interpretation of conventional measures of cardiac interoception. They also introduce a new framework to relate bodily signals that cannot be controlled experimentally to external signals that can, laying a computational foundation for embodied psychophysics.

Related

  1. Persistent Belief Updating Despite Perfect Predictability – The Atypical Iterative Prior Updating Account Of Autism
    Yun Wai Foo, Sonja Coenen, Christine Falter-Wagner +1
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  2. Change-point oddball elicits pupil-linked signatures of Bayesian belief updating
    L. Kopel, J. M. Hoomans, E. van Gastel +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Dynamic belief representation and updating through learned attractor-like dynamics in the frontal cortex
    S. A. Romero Pinto, J. A. Hennig, M. Burrell +7
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Thalamo-insular basis for updating physiological needs
    Y. Prilutski, I. Perets, S. Shtiglitz +3
    bioRxivPreprintPublic domainFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Preharvest temperature treatments influence physiological traits, secondary metabolites, and volatile compounds in holy basil under controlled environment conditions
    Patchareeya Boonkorkaew, Niafnan Hayi-asan, Akira Thongtip +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedPlant biologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{legrand2026cardiac,
  title = {{Cardiac belief updating from volatile physiological afferents}},
  author = {N. Legrand and L. Weber and C. Mathys},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.04.749527},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.04.749527v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cardiac belief updating from volatile physiological afferents
AU  - N. Legrand
AU  - L. Weber
AU  - C. Mathys
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/04
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.04.749527
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.04.749527v1
AB  - Cardiac interoception is commonly assessed by comparing subjective estimates of heart rate with physiological measurements. But beliefs can easily obscure these measures, such that they cannot readily distinguish sensitivity to afferent signals from the influence of prior expectations; this ultimately challenges the notion that behaviours under these tasks could reflect interoceptive processes at all. Here, we develop a computational framework that uses naturally occurring heart rate variability to quantify how strongly perceptual beliefs are updated by physiological evidence. We formalise interoception as weighted Bayesian updating under the joint influence of expectations and afferents, and derive a new measure, cardiac interoceptive sensitivity, that quantifies the extent to which beliefs move with incoming signals. Applying this to the largest Heart Rate Discrimination dataset to date (n=549), a task providing robust estimates of cardiac beliefs, we find that sensitivity is weak in the healthy population, but shows large interindividual differences, with 43% of the participants exhibiting behaviours at least minimally compatible with interoceptive processing. These findings challenge the interpretation of conventional measures of cardiac interoception. They also introduce a new framework to relate bodily signals that cannot be controlled experimentally to external signals that can, laying a computational foundation for embodied psychophysics.
ER  -