Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)

Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment from Routinely Collected Physical, Functional and Psychosocial Measures in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparative Machine-Learning and Regression Modelling Study in the Northern Japanese ORANGE Registry.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita 010-8543, Japan.
  2. 2Advanced Research Center for Geriatric and Gerontology, Akita University, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita 010-8543, Japan.
  3. 3Clinical Research Promotion and Support Office, Future Cooperative Research Organization, Akita University, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita 010-8543, Japan.
  4. 4Integrated Community Support Center, Public Health and Welfare Department, City Hall of Yokote, Yokote, Akita 010-8543, Japan.
  5. 5Omori Municipal Hospital, Yokote, Akita 010-8543, Japan.

Abstract

Background: Community health check-ups routinely collect non-cognitive data. Whether these support mild cognitive impairment (MCI) triage, and whether machine learning outperforms regression, is unclear. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 2650 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 in Akita, Japan (2018-2025). MCI was defined by the NCGG-FAT (1.5 SD, age/education-adjusted norms). Thirty-four pre-specified non-cognitive predictors were modelled using tree ensembles, penalised regression, other machine-learning families and simple reference scores, with stratified 70/30 splitting, DeLong tests, 100 repeated splits, training-derived thresholds, calibration metrics and decision-curve analysis. Results: MCI prevalence was 28.6%. Random forest discriminated best (ROC AUC 0.722, 95% CI 0.681-0.761; PR-AUC 0.542) and was well calibrated (slope 1.048; intercept -0.024), but its advantage over LASSO regression was marginal (ΔAUC +0.031, p = 0.044) and absent versus gradient boosting (p = 0.059). All multivariable models greatly outperformed the Kihon Checklist (AUC 0.550, p < 0.001). Neither operating point was deployable: at 0.5, sensitivity was 0.269 (166/227 cases missed); at the training-derived Youden threshold (0.321), sensitivity was 0.604, specificity 0.699, and PPV 0.445. Net benefit exceeded assess-all/assess-none between threshold probabilities 0.15-0.60. Conclusions: Routine non-cognitive data support moderate, well-calibrated MCI discrimination, but machine learning added little over regression. This is an exploratory triage aid requiring external validation.

Related

  1. Comparative Value of Cognitive and Functional Assessments for Predicting 24-Month Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease: An ADNI Cohort Study
    S. Choe
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurologymedRxiv
  2. Menopausal symptoms and work impairment: the moderating role of psychosocial work factors
    MGA Clevis, SH Van Oostrom, B Loef +3
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismPMCEurope PMC
  3. Psychosocial Distress and Radiation Treatment Interruptions in Patients With Cancer Using Machine Learning and Regression: Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Soheil Hashtarkhani, Christopher L Brett, Fekede Asefa Kumsa +6
    JMIR cancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  4. Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for mild cognitive impairment in older adults: A network meta-analysis
    Yixuan Wu, Yin Wu
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyCell PressCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis
    Baofang Zhang, Xuanling Li, Qian Zhao +7
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{kodama2026identifying,
  title = {{Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment from Routinely Collected Physical, Functional and Psychosocial Measures in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparative Machine-Learning and Regression Modelling Study in the Northern Japanese ORANGE Registry.}},
  author = {Ayuto Kodama and Takako Ohnuma and Kana Sasaki and Kaoru Sugawara and Nobuhiro Fujiyama and Youko Umetsu and Tsuyoshi Ono and Hidetaka Ota},
  journal = {Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/geriatrics11050138},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930017},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment from Routinely Collected Physical, Functional and Psychosocial Measures in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparative Machine-Learning and Regression Modelling Study in the Northern Japanese ORANGE Registry.
AU  - Ayuto Kodama
AU  - Takako Ohnuma
AU  - Kana Sasaki
AU  - Kaoru Sugawara
AU  - Nobuhiro Fujiyama
AU  - Youko Umetsu
AU  - Tsuyoshi Ono
AU  - Hidetaka Ota
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/geriatrics11050138
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930017
AB  - Background: Community health check-ups routinely collect non-cognitive data. Whether these support mild cognitive impairment (MCI) triage, and whether machine learning outperforms regression, is unclear. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 2650 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 in Akita, Japan (2018-2025). MCI was defined by the NCGG-FAT (1.5 SD, age/education-adjusted norms). Thirty-four pre-specified non-cognitive predictors were modelled using tree ensembles, penalised regression, other machine-learning families and simple reference scores, with stratified 70/30 splitting, DeLong tests, 100 repeated splits, training-derived thresholds, calibration metrics and decision-curve analysis. Results: MCI prevalence was 28.6%. Random forest discriminated best (ROC AUC 0.722, 95% CI 0.681-0.761; PR-AUC 0.542) and was well calibrated (slope 1.048; intercept -0.024), but its advantage over LASSO regression was marginal (ΔAUC +0.031, p = 0.044) and absent versus gradient boosting (p = 0.059). All multivariable models greatly outperformed the Kihon Checklist (AUC 0.550, p < 0.001). Neither operating point was deployable: at 0.5, sensitivity was 0.269 (166/227 cases missed); at the training-derived Youden threshold (0.321), sensitivity was 0.604, specificity 0.699, and PPV 0.445. Net benefit exceeded assess-all/assess-none between threshold probabilities 0.15-0.60. Conclusions: Routine non-cognitive data support moderate, well-calibrated MCI discrimination, but machine learning added little over regression. This is an exploratory triage aid requiring external validation.
SN  - 2308-3417
ER  -