Efficiency of Early Warning Scores in Adult Emergency Department and Inpatient Populations: Overview of Reviews.
4 affiliations
- 1Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 2University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 3Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Simulation Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 4University Hospital Brno, Second Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic.
Abstract
Introduction
Early Warning Scores (EWS) are used to support decisions regarding triage and early intervention of patient deterioration in emergency departments (ED) and other clinical environments. We synthesized evidence from systematic reviews on the predictive performance and clinical impact of EWS and their modifications in adult in-hospital populations.Methods
We conducted and reported an overview of reviews following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, PRIOR statement, and our predefined protocol. A systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid) and Epistemonikos was performed in May 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and critically appraised systematic reviews. We included systematic reviews of adult in-hospital populations evaluating EWS as either prognostic tools for deterioration or mortality, or as interventions implemented within track-and-trigger or rapid response systems. Primary study overlap was quantified using the corrected covered area (CCA). We synthesized evidence narratively and tabularly, emphasizing ED-related data.Results
From 502 records identified, 21 systematic reviews comprising 343 primary studies were included. We identified ED-relevant evidence in 12 reviews. In ED populations, EWS demonstrated moderate-to-good discrimination for mortality and clinical deterioration (National EWS area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values: 0.88 for 24-hour mortality, 0.86 for 48-hour mortality). Across ED and mixed acute-care cohorts, Early Warning Scores also showed fair performance for predicting ICU admission and composite adverse outcomes (AUROC ~0.70-0.75). In sepsis-focused analyses relevant to ED populations, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) demonstrated low sensitivity but high specificity for 28/30-day mortality (sensitivity 0.41, 95% CI, 0.24-0.62; specificity 0.88, 95% CI, 0.81-0.92). The SOFA score showed high sensitivity and moderate specificity for in-hospital mortality (sensitivity 0.89, 95% CI, 0.88-0.90; specificity 0.69, 95% CI, 0.68-0.69). Evidence on the clinical impact of EWS implementation in ED and other emergency settings was limited and heterogeneous.Conclusion
In EDs, Early Warning Scores support early risk stratification and identification of patients at risk of deterioration, particularly for short-term mortality and escalation of care. Their impact on patient-important outcomes remains uncertain. Early Warning Scores should complement clinical judgment, triage systems, and structured escalation protocols. They should not be a standalone tool. Future research should prioritize standardized thresholds, transparent reporting, and rigorous comparative and implementation studies defining the role of EWS in emergency care.
Related
- Efficiency and Humanism: The Impact of the Humanistic Charting Tool on Patient Experience in the Emergency Department.
- Overview of Regulatory Guidelines Related to Methods and Models for Small Populations
- Automated Calculation of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Intra-Abdominal Injury Rule from Unstructured Emergency Department Notes Using a Large Language Model
- Emergency Department Management of Ankle Fractures: A Narrative Review
- Antipsychotic-Induced Parkinsonism With Concurrent Benztropine-Associated Anticholinergic Effects in a Community Emergency Department Setting: A Case Report
BibTeX
@article{pospisil2026efficiency,
title = {{Efficiency of Early Warning Scores in Adult Emergency Department and Inpatient Populations: Overview of Reviews.}},
author = {Michal Pospíšil and Tereza Friessová and Tamara Skříšovská and Andrea Pokorná and Jan Maláska and Jana Rozmarinová and Alena Langaufová},
journal = {The western journal of emergency medicine},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.5811/westjem.62022},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900932},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Efficiency of Early Warning Scores in Adult Emergency Department and Inpatient Populations: Overview of Reviews.
AU - Michal Pospíšil
AU - Tereza Friessová
AU - Tamara Skříšovská
AU - Andrea Pokorná
AU - Jan Maláska
AU - Jana Rozmarinová
AU - Alena Langaufová
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/31
JO - The western journal of emergency medicine
DO - 10.5811/westjem.62022
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900932
AB - Introduction Early Warning Scores (EWS) are used to support decisions regarding triage and early intervention of patient deterioration in emergency departments (ED) and other clinical environments. We synthesized evidence from systematic reviews on the predictive performance and clinical impact of EWS and their modifications in adult in-hospital populations.Methods We conducted and reported an overview of reviews following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, PRIOR statement, and our predefined protocol. A systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid) and Epistemonikos was performed in May 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and critically appraised systematic reviews. We included systematic reviews of adult in-hospital populations evaluating EWS as either prognostic tools for deterioration or mortality, or as interventions implemented within track-and-trigger or rapid response systems. Primary study overlap was quantified using the corrected covered area (CCA). We synthesized evidence narratively and tabularly, emphasizing ED-related data.Results From 502 records identified, 21 systematic reviews comprising 343 primary studies were included. We identified ED-relevant evidence in 12 reviews. In ED populations, EWS demonstrated moderate-to-good discrimination for mortality and clinical deterioration (National EWS area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values: 0.88 for 24-hour mortality, 0.86 for 48-hour mortality). Across ED and mixed acute-care cohorts, Early Warning Scores also showed fair performance for predicting ICU admission and composite adverse outcomes (AUROC ~0.70-0.75). In sepsis-focused analyses relevant to ED populations, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) demonstrated low sensitivity but high specificity for 28/30-day mortality (sensitivity 0.41, 95% CI, 0.24-0.62; specificity 0.88, 95% CI, 0.81-0.92). The SOFA score showed high sensitivity and moderate specificity for in-hospital mortality (sensitivity 0.89, 95% CI, 0.88-0.90; specificity 0.69, 95% CI, 0.68-0.69). Evidence on the clinical impact of EWS implementation in ED and other emergency settings was limited and heterogeneous.Conclusion In EDs, Early Warning Scores support early risk stratification and identification of patients at risk of deterioration, particularly for short-term mortality and escalation of care. Their impact on patient-important outcomes remains uncertain. Early Warning Scores should complement clinical judgment, triage systems, and structured escalation protocols. They should not be a standalone tool. Future research should prioritize standardized thresholds, transparent reporting, and rigorous comparative and implementation studies defining the role of EWS in emergency care.
SN - 1936-900X
SN - 1936-9018
ER -