The Regularity datum on time-varying graph domains and Dirichlet--Regularity duality
Abstract
In this paper we address a basic question that has not been considered in the literature on the parabolic Regularity problem. Let Ω be the region above the graph of a Lip(1,1/2) function ϕ on ℝn−1×ℝ. The corresponding L̇p1,1/2 Regularity boundary space on ∂Ω is defined by pulling the datum back to the flat space where we have the norm |∇ f|Lp+|D1/2t f|Lp. As there is more than one graph parametrisation of such a domain, this could petentially lead to different notions of L̇p1,1/2(∂Ω). This issue arises only on time-varying domains, which is likely why the issue has not been noticed before. We show by example that the boundary spaces can indeed disagree. We then prove that an additional assumption D1/2tϕ∈BMOpar (called the Lewis--Murray condition), resolves the issue completely: the spaces defined through different graphs agree.\medskip This gives us a well-defined Regularity datum space on every Lewis--Murray graph domain. We then extend the duality between the parabolic Dirichlet and Regularity problems, proved on cylinders by the author and E.~Nyström, to such domains.
Related
- SLOPE DETERMINATION ON CONVEX DOMAINS: DIRICHLET DATA AND CRANDALL-PAZY DIRECTIONS
- Double shuffle and naive duality for multiple Dirichlet series
- The Dirichlet problem with boundary data of fractional smoothness in domains with Ahlfors regular boundary
- Strict Dirichlet Pólya Inequality for Simply Connected Planar Domains
- Weighted heat traces of the Dirichlet Laplacian on Lipschitz domains
BibTeX
@misc{dindos2026regularity,
title = {{The Regularity datum on time-varying graph domains and Dirichlet--Regularity duality}},
author = {Martin Dindoš},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.18874},
eprint = {2609.18874},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18874},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The Regularity datum on time-varying graph domains and Dirichlet--Regularity duality
AU - Martin Dindoš
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/16
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.18874
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18874
AB - In this paper we address a basic question that has not been considered in the literature on the parabolic Regularity problem. Let Ω be the region above the graph of a Lip(1,1/2) function ϕ on ℝ^n−1×ℝ. The corresponding L̇^p_1,1/2 Regularity boundary space on ∂Ω is defined by pulling the datum back to the flat space where we have the norm |∇ f|_L^p+|D^1/2_t f|_L^p. As there is more than one graph parametrisation of such a domain, this could petentially lead to different notions of L̇^p_1,1/2(∂Ω). This issue arises only on time-varying domains, which is likely why the issue has not been noticed before. We show by example that the boundary spaces can indeed disagree. We then prove that an additional assumption D^1/2_tϕ∈BMOpar (called the Lewis--Murray condition), resolves the issue completely: the spaces defined through different graphs agree.\medskip This gives us a well-defined Regularity datum space on every Lewis--Murray graph domain. We then extend the duality between the parabolic Dirichlet and Regularity problems, proved on cylinders by the author and E.~Nyström, to such domains.
ER -