Stop Auditing Mothers and Start Auditing Systems.
- 1Department of Biomedical, Health and Exercise Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
National breastfeeding statistics are conventionally read as a measure of maternal behaviour, and the dominant policy response has been to educate and encourage individual women. This Perspective argues that breastfeeding statistics should be interpreted primarily as indicators of system performance rather than maternal behaviour. In high-income countries, much early cessation occurs among women who intended to continue breastfeeding but could not obtain timely, effective support. The resulting shortfall therefore reflects constrained choice as much as personal preference. That both the systems framing and the intention-to-cessation indicator already exist in the literature is acknowledged directly: surveillance research has measured the gap, described its risk factors, and mapped its social patterning. Viewed through a quality-and-safety lens, unwanted early cessation has many of the characteristics of a preventable harm. It is common, patterned by identifiable failures of care, and partly avertable with known interventions such as evidence-based maternity practices, proactive post-discharge contact, adequate paid leave, and protection from substitute marketing. The contribution of this Perspective is not a new metric, but a new use for an existing one. I argue that unwanted early cessation should be treated as an accountable quality indicator within the quality-and-safety systems already used for other preventable harms. Rather than remaining a descriptive statistic, it should become a measure for which health services, employers, and policymakers share accountability. The paper also addresses how intention should be measured, considers the risks of increased surveillance, safeguards maternal autonomy, avoids shifting blame onto clinicians, and distinguishes challenges in high-income settings from priorities in lower-income contexts.
Related
- Evaluating the Synergistic Impact of Digital Logistics Systems (eLMIS) and Financial Auditing (APTS) on Essential Commodity Availability in Ethiopian Public Healthcare Facilities: A Multilevel Analysis of the 2024/2025 National Survey
- Declining Adherence to Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet Among US Adults with Hypertension: NHANES 2003-2018
- When Should a Clinician Stop trying to Prevent a Patient’s Suicide?: A commentary on Campione and Joiner (2026)
- One-stop photon-counting CT angiography for simultaneous assessment of cardio-cerebrovascular lesions: A case report
- Start low to stay long: adapted dose escalation as a patient-centered strategy for adjuvant Abemaciclib
BibTeX
@article{louie2026stop,
title = {{Stop Auditing Mothers and Start Auditing Systems.}},
author = {Jimmy Chun Yu Louie},
journal = {Maternal \& child nutrition},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1111/mcn.70267},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42876415},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Stop Auditing Mothers and Start Auditing Systems.
AU - Jimmy Chun Yu Louie
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Maternal & child nutrition
DO - 10.1111/mcn.70267
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42876415
AB - National breastfeeding statistics are conventionally read as a measure of maternal behaviour, and the dominant policy response has been to educate and encourage individual women. This Perspective argues that breastfeeding statistics should be interpreted primarily as indicators of system performance rather than maternal behaviour. In high-income countries, much early cessation occurs among women who intended to continue breastfeeding but could not obtain timely, effective support. The resulting shortfall therefore reflects constrained choice as much as personal preference. That both the systems framing and the intention-to-cessation indicator already exist in the literature is acknowledged directly: surveillance research has measured the gap, described its risk factors, and mapped its social patterning. Viewed through a quality-and-safety lens, unwanted early cessation has many of the characteristics of a preventable harm. It is common, patterned by identifiable failures of care, and partly avertable with known interventions such as evidence-based maternity practices, proactive post-discharge contact, adequate paid leave, and protection from substitute marketing. The contribution of this Perspective is not a new metric, but a new use for an existing one. I argue that unwanted early cessation should be treated as an accountable quality indicator within the quality-and-safety systems already used for other preventable harms. Rather than remaining a descriptive statistic, it should become a measure for which health services, employers, and policymakers share accountability. The paper also addresses how intention should be measured, considers the risks of increased surveillance, safeguards maternal autonomy, avoids shifting blame onto clinicians, and distinguishes challenges in high-income settings from priorities in lower-income contexts.
SN - 1740-8695
SN - 1740-8709
ER -