Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintCC BYZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Complete Resolution of the Cosmological Constant Problem: Derivation of Λ = E_Planck × κ_crit^(φ/2 + 3/4) from Causal Coherence, Golden Ratio Geometry, and Informational Thermodynamics

Abstract

COMPLETE RESEARCH RECORD — ZENODO DEPOSITAuthor: Miguel Ángel PercudaniORCID: 0009-0007-1748-3212 ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ABSTRACT═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ This deposit presents three interconnected investigations within the Unified Applicable Time (UAT) framework: PART I — THEORETICAL DERIVATION OF THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────The cosmological constant is derived from first principles through three independent, non-adjustable pillars: Pillar 1 (Informational): κ_crit = 10⁻⁷⁸ From the Bekenstein bound on the particle horizon. N_accessible ≈ 10⁷⁸ → κ_crit = 1/N_accessible. Ensures entropic equilibrium at the Planck scale. Pillar 2 (Geometric-Dimensional): φ/2 = 0.809017 From the 8-phase coherence matrix and the spectral dimension flow of Loop Quantum Gravity (d_S: 4 → 2). d_eff = φ × d_S(UV)/d_S(IR) = φ × 2/4 = φ/2. Pillar 3 (Thermodynamic): 3/4 = 0.750000 From the quadratic scaling of the half-phase tension. 1 − (1/2)² = 3/4. These combine to give: α = φ/2 + 3/4 = 0.809017 + 0.750000 = 1.559017 V₀ = E_Planck × κ_crit^α = 2.50 × 10⁻¹²² M_Pl⁴ ρ_Λ = 6.90 × 10⁻²⁷ J/m³ Matching the observed dark energy density (Planck 2018) with Δ = 0.00 orders of magnitude. No free parameters. No fine-tuning.No experimental input required. Pure deductive mathematics. PART II — LIGO/VIRGO SEARCH: NULL RESULT─────────────────────────────────────────A systematic search for φ-spaced spectral peaks in gravitational wave ringdown was conducted using data from 12 black hole mergers and 1 binary neutron star merger (GW170817). • Initial results with ±5% tolerance appeared promising.• A Rigorous Robustness Audit Protocol (PAR) was implemented: Monte Carlo simulation with 500 iterations of synthetic noise.• At ±5% tolerance: 98.4% of random noise produces ≥4 coincidences — the look-elsewhere effect dominates.• At ±1% tolerance: 0/16 segments reach the definitive threshold (p < 0.01) in GW170817.• Mean inspiral φ-matches: 2.38 (below the 3.0 threshold for p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Current LIGO O4 detector technology does not yet possess the sensitivity required to resolve the predicted φ-structure in gravitational wave ringdown. This is a technological limitation, not a refutation of the UAT framework. PART III — DESI DR1 BAO: INDEPENDENT VALIDATION────────────────────────────────────────────────Analysis of DESI DR1 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation data reveals clear φ-structure in cosmic distance ratios: • 63 ratios analyzed (21 redshift pairs × 3 distance measures).• 14 Fibonacci ratios detected (22.2%).• Expected random matches: 3.2.• EXCESS OVER RANDOM: 6.3σ. Best Fibonacci matches:• D_V/r_d (z=0.71→1.49): ratio=1.6001 ≈ 8/5=1.6000 (Δ=0.0001, 0.01%)• D_M/r_d (z=0.30→0.71): ratio=1.5914 ≈ 8/5=1.6000 (Δ=0.0054)• D_M/r_d (z=1.32→2.33): ratio=1.6393 ≈ 13/8=1.6250 (Δ=0.0088) UAT cosmology matches DESI at z=2.33 with 0.3% discrepancy.No frequency sweep is performed — the look-elsewhere effect is eliminated by design. CONTRAST LIGO vs. DESI:───────────────────────• LIGO: Sweeps 80 reference frequencies × 7 harmonics = 560 comparisons per segment. Look-elsewhere effect requires ±1% tolerance for significance. Signal indistinguishable from noise.• DESI: 63 fixed comparisons. No parameters scanned. Fibonacci fractions are predetermined. Signal detected at 6.3σ significance. The difference is methodological: DESI measures the integrated cosmic expansion history over billions of years, accumulating φ-structure. LIGO attempts to resolve instantaneous spectral structure in seconds-long ringdown, where instrumental noise dominates. ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════DOCUMENTS INCLUDED═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ final_report.pdf — Complete technical report with all three partsfinal_report.tex — LaTeX source SCRIPTS (self-contained Python, download data automatically): • deep_resolution_ccp.py — Analytical derivation of Λ • percudani_null_hypothesis_test.py — PAR Monte Carlo (±5%) • strict_tolerance_null_test.py — PAR Monte Carlo (±1%) • gw170817_strict_validation.py — GW170817 with ±1% tolerance • refined_methodology.py — Continuous φ-alignment, Fibonacci, adaptive windowing • desi_dr1_exhaustive_phi_analysis.py — DESI BAO φ-analysis ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════KEYWORDS═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ cosmological constant, dark energy, vacuum energy density,golden ratio, Fibonacci sequence, causal coherence, Bekenstein bound, entropic equilibrium, Loop Quantum Gravity,spectral dimension, 8-phase coherence matrix,black hole ringdown, gravitational waves, LIGO, Virgo,GW150914, GW170817, DESI DR1, baryon acoustic oscillations,look-elsewhere effect, Monte Carlo simulation,statistical significance, falsifiable predictions,Unified Applicable Time, UAT framework ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════LICENSE═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Related

  1. First-Principles Derivation of the MOND Interpolating Function and Scale from Horizon Thermodynamics
    David Margetts, Anthony Margetts
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)PreprintCC BY6 citedCosmologyOpenAlex
  2. Are Black Hole and Cosmological Horizon Thermodynamics Necessarily Inequivalent?
    Zachary J. Hoelscher
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  3. Environmental Dependence of Satellite Planarity and Orbital-Pole Coherence around Milky Way Analogues in a Hydrodynamical Cosmological Simulation
    Peng Wang, Yu Luo, Jiang Chang +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGalaxiesarXiv
  4. Entropy, Expansion, and χ‑Spectral Structuring: Operator‑Geometric Resolution of the Cosmological Order‑from‑Chaos Paradox
    Anatolii Mukha
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)PreprintCC BY13 citedCosmologyOpenAlex
  5. AI-assisted super-resolution cosmological simulations V: Cosmology-aware super-resolution
    Xiaowen Zhang, Patrick Lachance, Rupert A. C. Croft +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{percudani2026complete,
  title = {{Complete Resolution of the Cosmological Constant Problem: Derivation of Λ = E_Planck × κ_crit^(φ/2 + 3/4) from Causal Coherence, Golden Ratio Geometry, and Informational Thermodynamics}},
  author = {Miguel Percudani},
  howpublished = {Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.20724035},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20724035},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Complete Resolution of the Cosmological Constant Problem: Derivation of Λ = E_Planck × κ_crit^(φ/2 + 3/4) from Causal Coherence, Golden Ratio Geometry, and Informational Thermodynamics
AU  - Miguel Percudani
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/16
PB  - Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.20724035
UR  - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20724035
AB  - COMPLETE RESEARCH RECORD — ZENODO DEPOSITAuthor: Miguel Ángel PercudaniORCID: 0009-0007-1748-3212 ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ABSTRACT═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ This deposit presents three interconnected investigations within the Unified Applicable Time (UAT) framework: PART I — THEORETICAL DERIVATION OF THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────The cosmological constant is derived from first principles through three independent, non-adjustable pillars: Pillar 1 (Informational): κ_crit = 10⁻⁷⁸ From the Bekenstein bound on the particle horizon. N_accessible ≈ 10⁷⁸ → κ_crit = 1/N_accessible. Ensures entropic equilibrium at the Planck scale. Pillar 2 (Geometric-Dimensional): φ/2 = 0.809017 From the 8-phase coherence matrix and the spectral dimension flow of Loop Quantum Gravity (d_S: 4 → 2). d_eff = φ × d_S(UV)/d_S(IR) = φ × 2/4 = φ/2. Pillar 3 (Thermodynamic): 3/4 = 0.750000 From the quadratic scaling of the half-phase tension. 1 − (1/2)² = 3/4. These combine to give: α = φ/2 + 3/4 = 0.809017 + 0.750000 = 1.559017 V₀ = E_Planck × κ_crit^α = 2.50 × 10⁻¹²² M_Pl⁴ ρ_Λ = 6.90 × 10⁻²⁷ J/m³ Matching the observed dark energy density (Planck 2018) with Δ = 0.00 orders of magnitude. No free parameters. No fine-tuning.No experimental input required. Pure deductive mathematics. PART II — LIGO/VIRGO SEARCH: NULL RESULT─────────────────────────────────────────A systematic search for φ-spaced spectral peaks in gravitational wave ringdown was conducted using data from 12 black hole mergers and 1 binary neutron star merger (GW170817). • Initial results with ±5% tolerance appeared promising.• A Rigorous Robustness Audit Protocol (PAR) was implemented: Monte Carlo simulation with 500 iterations of synthetic noise.• At ±5% tolerance: 98.4% of random noise produces ≥4 coincidences — the look-elsewhere effect dominates.• At ±1% tolerance: 0/16 segments reach the definitive threshold (p < 0.01) in GW170817.• Mean inspiral φ-matches: 2.38 (below the 3.0 threshold for p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Current LIGO O4 detector technology does not yet possess the sensitivity required to resolve the predicted φ-structure in gravitational wave ringdown. This is a technological limitation, not a refutation of the UAT framework. PART III — DESI DR1 BAO: INDEPENDENT VALIDATION────────────────────────────────────────────────Analysis of DESI DR1 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation data reveals clear φ-structure in cosmic distance ratios: • 63 ratios analyzed (21 redshift pairs × 3 distance measures).• 14 Fibonacci ratios detected (22.2%).• Expected random matches: 3.2.• EXCESS OVER RANDOM: 6.3σ. Best Fibonacci matches:• D_V/r_d (z=0.71→1.49): ratio=1.6001 ≈ 8/5=1.6000 (Δ=0.0001, 0.01%)• D_M/r_d (z=0.30→0.71): ratio=1.5914 ≈ 8/5=1.6000 (Δ=0.0054)• D_M/r_d (z=1.32→2.33): ratio=1.6393 ≈ 13/8=1.6250 (Δ=0.0088) UAT cosmology matches DESI at z=2.33 with 0.3% discrepancy.No frequency sweep is performed — the look-elsewhere effect is eliminated by design. CONTRAST LIGO vs. DESI:───────────────────────• LIGO: Sweeps 80 reference frequencies × 7 harmonics = 560 comparisons per segment. Look-elsewhere effect requires ±1% tolerance for significance. Signal indistinguishable from noise.• DESI: 63 fixed comparisons. No parameters scanned. Fibonacci fractions are predetermined. Signal detected at 6.3σ significance. The difference is methodological: DESI measures the integrated cosmic expansion history over billions of years, accumulating φ-structure. LIGO attempts to resolve instantaneous spectral structure in seconds-long ringdown, where instrumental noise dominates. ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════DOCUMENTS INCLUDED═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ final_report.pdf — Complete technical report with all three partsfinal_report.tex — LaTeX source SCRIPTS (self-contained Python, download data automatically): • deep_resolution_ccp.py — Analytical derivation of Λ • percudani_null_hypothesis_test.py — PAR Monte Carlo (±5%) • strict_tolerance_null_test.py — PAR Monte Carlo (±1%) • gw170817_strict_validation.py — GW170817 with ±1% tolerance • refined_methodology.py — Continuous φ-alignment, Fibonacci, adaptive windowing • desi_dr1_exhaustive_phi_analysis.py — DESI BAO φ-analysis ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════KEYWORDS═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ cosmological constant, dark energy, vacuum energy density,golden ratio, Fibonacci sequence, causal coherence, Bekenstein bound, entropic equilibrium, Loop Quantum Gravity,spectral dimension, 8-phase coherence matrix,black hole ringdown, gravitational waves, LIGO, Virgo,GW150914, GW170817, DESI DR1, baryon acoustic oscillations,look-elsewhere effect, Monte Carlo simulation,statistical significance, falsifiable predictions,Unified Applicable Time, UAT framework ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════LICENSE═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
ER  -