Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCJournal of audiology & otology

Expanding the Functional Profile of Hearing Loss: Evidence for Including Balance and Mobility Categories in the ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss.

  1. 1Department of Speech-Language and Hearing Sciences, ABILITY Research Lab, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA

Abstract

Background and objectives

Balance and mobility difficulties are common in adults with hearing loss (HL), but are often overlooked in clinical practice because of fragmented care models; the siloed structure of clinical services; and limitations in the current International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based assessment frameworks. This study aimed to quantify these difficulties and examine their associations with functional domains.Subjects and methods

A cross-sectional study included 72 adults (mean age, 59±8.3 years), comprising participants with normal hearing (25%) and HL (75%), including both unaided and aided users. Participants were purposively recruited from the Speech and Hearing Clinic at Auburn University and had previously completed the HEAR-COMMAND Tool, a self-assessment questionnaire derived from the ICF-Core Sets for HL (ICF-CSHL). In addition, all participants completed the Balance and Mobility Scale (BMS), a 13-item instrument modeled after the HEAR-COMMAND Tool, to benchmark balance-mobility difficulties.Results

The BMS results demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α=0.90) and two distinct but correlated factors, Physical Mobility and Perceptual Experience, supporting its structural validity. Balance-mobility challenges were highly prevalent, including walking fatigue (73.6%), difficulty performing complex movements (72.2%), difficulty transitioning between positions (70.8%), leg stiffness (68.1%), standing instability (61.1%), and difficulty walking long distances (50%). BMS scores were strongly associated with HEAR-COMMAND scores, explaining significant variance in both the hearing domain (β=0.50, p<0.001, R2=0.40) and non-hearing domain (β=0.63, p<0.001, R2=0.48). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that only the hearing-domain scores differed significantly among groups, with participants with normal hearing outperforming both unaided and aided participants with HL.Conclusions

The high prevalence and strong functional associations of balance-mobility challenges indicate that they are core components of disability in individuals with HL. Incorporating these domains into the ICF-CSHL frameworks and their derived assessment tools, including the HEAR-COMMAND Tool, may support a more person-centered and function-oriented approach to hearing healthcare.

Related

  1. Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network
    Nienke Streefkerk, James I. Geller, Kristin Knight +25
    Ear & HearingPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text2 citedNeuroscienceHALPMC
  2. MERS-CoV accessory ORF proteins in innate immune evasion: an evidence-graded functional framework
    Chunhua Wang, Xuhang Li, Yi Jiang +6
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
  3. Functional disability and cognition in relation to residential transitions in older adults: Evidence from three French cohorts, 1988-2018
    Jeanne Bardinet, Luc Letenneur, Alice Pellichero +4
    The Journal of Frailty & AgingPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  4. Cognitive Control as a Brake on the Depression–Internet Addiction Link: Task-Based fMRI Evidence from Activation and Task-Modulated Functional Connectivity
    JIAJIA ZHU, Tianxiang Jiang, Lawrence Hoc Nang Fong +1
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  5. Insect-derived bioactives for sustainable functional food development: evidence, limitations and translational insights from established natural sources
    Dearbhla Finnegan, Christine Loscher
    Future FoodsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{alfakir2026expanding,
  title = {{Expanding the Functional Profile of Hearing Loss: Evidence for Including Balance and Mobility Categories in the ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss.}},
  author = {Razan Alfakir},
  journal = {Journal of audiology \& otology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.7874/jao.2025.00654},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958772},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Expanding the Functional Profile of Hearing Loss: Evidence for Including Balance and Mobility Categories in the ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss.
AU  - Razan Alfakir
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Journal of audiology & otology
DO  - 10.7874/jao.2025.00654
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958772
AB  - Background and objectives  Balance and mobility difficulties are common in adults with hearing loss (HL), but are often overlooked in clinical practice because of fragmented care models; the siloed structure of clinical services; and limitations in the current International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based assessment frameworks. This study aimed to quantify these difficulties and examine their associations with functional domains.Subjects and methods  A cross-sectional study included 72 adults (mean age, 59±8.3 years), comprising participants with normal hearing (25%) and HL (75%), including both unaided and aided users. Participants were purposively recruited from the Speech and Hearing Clinic at Auburn University and had previously completed the HEAR-COMMAND Tool, a self-assessment questionnaire derived from the ICF-Core Sets for HL (ICF-CSHL). In addition, all participants completed the Balance and Mobility Scale (BMS), a 13-item instrument modeled after the HEAR-COMMAND Tool, to benchmark balance-mobility difficulties.Results  The BMS results demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α=0.90) and two distinct but correlated factors, Physical Mobility and Perceptual Experience, supporting its structural validity. Balance-mobility challenges were highly prevalent, including walking fatigue (73.6%), difficulty performing complex movements (72.2%), difficulty transitioning between positions (70.8%), leg stiffness (68.1%), standing instability (61.1%), and difficulty walking long distances (50%). BMS scores were strongly associated with HEAR-COMMAND scores, explaining significant variance in both the hearing domain (β=0.50, p<0.001, R2=0.40) and non-hearing domain (β=0.63, p<0.001, R2=0.48). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that only the hearing-domain scores differed significantly among groups, with participants with normal hearing outperforming both unaided and aided participants with HL.Conclusions  The high prevalence and strong functional associations of balance-mobility challenges indicate that they are core components of disability in individuals with HL. Incorporating these domains into the ICF-CSHL frameworks and their derived assessment tools, including the HEAR-COMMAND Tool, may support a more person-centered and function-oriented approach to hearing healthcare.
SN  - 2384-1621
SN  - 2384-1710
ER  -