Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS Medicine

HIV self-testing and the global diagnostic gap: Addressing a decade of missed opportunity

4 affiliations
  1. 1Independent Global Health Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland
  2. 2Independent Global Health Consultant, New Delhi, India
  3. 3Tinpswalo Research Association to Fight AIDS and TB, Chokwe, Mozambique
  4. 4Nucleo de Pesquisa Pediatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique

Abstract

Summary points: In 2015, a survey-based analysis across 16 sub-Saharan African countries estimated that nearly half of people living with HIV were undiagnosed, implying ~11 million people in the region were outside the treatment cascade. However, HIV self-testing (HIVST), a technology effectively positioned to close this gap, was deployed at negligible scale for a decade following WHO recommendation in 2016. The gap has narrowed, but through conventional testing rather than HIVST, and 2.6 million people in sub-Saharan Africa and 4.9 million globally still did not know their HIV status in 2025. The decade of delay carries a likely avoidable burden of millions of illnesses, deaths and onward transmissions, though this has not been formally modelled. The need for HIVST in low- and middle-income countries was estimated at 177 million self-tests in 2020, rising to 192 million by 2025. Confirmed procurement over the same period reached only 21 million kits in total, an average of 5.3 million per year, or 3% of estimated annual need. Four interlocking structural failures explain this missed opportunity: 1) research capture through demonstration projects that substituted for population-scale deployment; 2) the early supervised self-testing paradox in which provider-assisted delivery reconstituted the clinic barriers HIVST was designed to bypass; 3) procurement conservatism that suppressed market development; and 4) an accountability failure with no publicly accessible Africa-level volume series, making the scale of the missed opportunity impossible to measure from published data. Four actions could improve access: 1) mandatory public reporting of HIVST commodity volumes; 2) a dedicated Africa-specific distribution target of at least 50 million kits per year within the UNAIDS 95-95-95 framework; 3) community-based distribution as the default model for the general population; and 4) explicit HIVST volume commitments in the GHSD’s 2026–2030 memoranda of understanding and work plans. In this Policy Forum article, Isabelle Munyangaju and colleagues discuss why the roll-out and scale-up of HIV self-testing over the last decade has been inadequate, and highlight what is needed—learning from past failures around governance, distribution and financing—to close the diagnostic gap.

Related

  1. Climate Change Finance and Carbon Offsets: Addressing Global Climate Challenges through Innovative Funding and Emissions Reduction Mechanisms
    Monday Sunday Adiaha
    Journal of the University of RuhunaPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEcologyClimate scienceHAL
  2. ANCA testing strategies: A single centre experience over the past decade in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands
    Maria A. C. Wester Trejo, Tjallingius Martijn Kuijper, Geeke J. Waverijn +7
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyOncologyPLOS
  3. Diagnostic pathways in developmental disorders: a decade-apart comparison of two multicenter cohorts (2012–2022)
    Julien Maraval, Céline Dampfhoffer, Antoine Journé +88
    European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsHuman geneticsHAL
  4. Addressing global hotspots of drought-related crop production losses
    Marta Tuninetti, Kyle Frankel Davis
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text9 citedEcologyOpenAlex
  5. Serological testing for Lyme disease: current assays, diagnostic performance, and challenges
    Lili Tao
    Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{granich2026selftesting,
  title = {{HIV self-testing and the global diagnostic gap: Addressing a decade of missed opportunity}},
  author = {Reuben Granich and Somya Gupta and Isabelle Munyangaju and Mike Ruffner},
  journal = {PLOS Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pmed.1005241},
  url = {https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1005241},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - HIV self-testing and the global diagnostic gap: Addressing a decade of missed opportunity
AU  - Reuben Granich
AU  - Somya Gupta
AU  - Isabelle Munyangaju
AU  - Mike Ruffner
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
JO  - PLOS Medicine
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1005241
UR  - https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1005241
AB  - Summary points: In 2015, a survey-based analysis across 16 sub-Saharan African countries estimated that nearly half of people living with HIV were undiagnosed, implying ~11 million people in the region were outside the treatment cascade. However, HIV self-testing (HIVST), a technology effectively positioned to close this gap, was deployed at negligible scale for a decade following WHO recommendation in 2016. The gap has narrowed, but through conventional testing rather than HIVST, and 2.6 million people in sub-Saharan Africa and 4.9 million globally still did not know their HIV status in 2025. The decade of delay carries a likely avoidable burden of millions of illnesses, deaths and onward transmissions, though this has not been formally modelled. The need for HIVST in low- and middle-income countries was estimated at 177 million self-tests in 2020, rising to 192 million by 2025. Confirmed procurement over the same period reached only 21 million kits in total, an average of 5.3 million per year, or 3% of estimated annual need. Four interlocking structural failures explain this missed opportunity: 1) research capture through demonstration projects that substituted for population-scale deployment; 2) the early supervised self-testing paradox in which provider-assisted delivery reconstituted the clinic barriers HIVST was designed to bypass; 3) procurement conservatism that suppressed market development; and 4) an accountability failure with no publicly accessible Africa-level volume series, making the scale of the missed opportunity impossible to measure from published data. Four actions could improve access: 1) mandatory public reporting of HIVST commodity volumes; 2) a dedicated Africa-specific distribution target of at least 50 million kits per year within the UNAIDS 95-95-95 framework; 3) community-based distribution as the default model for the general population; and 4) explicit HIVST volume commitments in the GHSD’s 2026–2030 memoranda of understanding and work plans. In this Policy Forum article, Isabelle Munyangaju and colleagues discuss why the roll-out and scale-up of HIV self-testing over the last decade has been inadequate, and highlight what is needed—learning from past failures around governance, distribution and financing—to close the diagnostic gap.
SN  - 1549-1676
ER  -