Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Psychology

Cultural redevelopment and validation of the emotion regulation goals scale – culturally redeveloped version (ERGS-CRV): evidence from Iran

  1. 1Department of Clinical Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2Graduate of Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3Department of Psychology, the American University in Cairo, New Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Introduction: Emotion regulation goals (ERGs) represent an important yet understudied aspect of self-regulation, particularly in non-Western cultural contexts. Existing measures primarily focus on emotion-regulation strategies, and culturally appropriate instruments for assessing ERGs remain limited. The present study aimed to culturally redevelop and validate the Emotion Regulation Goals Scale – Culturally Redeveloped Version (ERGS-CRV) for use in an Iranian population.

Method: A total of 1,475 Iranian adults (67.9% women; M = 29.86, SD = 10.24; age 18–71) completed the ERGS-CRV. The validation process included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses using split-sample cross-validation, reliability assessment, convergent and discriminant validity analyses, test–retest reliability, and measurement invariance testing across gender groups.

Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a five-factor structure consisting of Pro-Hedonic, Contra-Hedonic, Performance, Pro-Social, and Impression Management dimensions. Reliability estimates ranged from 0.54 to 0.91 across subscales, with stronger internal consistency observed for the Performance, Pro-Social, and Impression Management dimensions. Evidence of convergent validity was strongest for the Pro-Social and Impression Management dimensions, acceptable for the Performance dimension, and comparatively weaker for the Pro-Hedonic and Contra-Hedonic dimensions. Discriminant validity was confirmed using both the Fornell–Larcker criterion and the heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). Test–retest coefficients indicated good to excellent temporal stability. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses supported configural, metric, scalar, and strict measurement invariance across gender groups.

Conclusions: The ERGS-CRV provides a culturally informed measure of emotion-regulation goals in Iranian adults, with stronger psychometric support for the Pro-Social and Impression Management dimensions, acceptable support for the Performance dimension, and comparatively weaker support for the Pro-Hedonic and Contra-Hedonic dimensions. The findings support its use for research on emotion-regulation motives in Persian-speaking and potentially other non-Western populations.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05480-8.

Related

  1. Emotion Beyond Bias: Affective and Cultural Scaffolding in Self-Regulation and Metacognition
    Alice Conti, Alessandro Bortolotti, Alessandro Crociata +2
    Journal of IntelligencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  2. Development and Validation of a Culturally Tailored Mental Health Literacy Training Program for Indian School Teachers
    R. S. Dass, C. Periyasami
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  3. Culturally grounded health communication to support self-care among pregnant women with diabetes: Development and content validation of an educational cordel in Brazil
    Francisca Édla Santos Leite Gurgel, Raimunda Magalhães da Silva, Jonas Loiola Gonçalves +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPLOS
  4. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and arabic translation of the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation
    Feras Alkholaiwi, Yazeed Alghonaim
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Persian ObsQoR-10 in inpatient women 24 to 48 h after vaginal or elective cesarean delivery
    Mahsa Maghalian, Sahar Rouhzendeh, Mojgan Mirghafourvand
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCrossref
BibTeX
@article{moghadasin2026cultural,
  title = {{Cultural redevelopment and validation of the emotion regulation goals scale – culturally redeveloped version (ERGS-CRV): evidence from Iran}},
  author = {Maryam Moghadasin and Kamran Salem and Lameese Eldesouky},
  journal = {BMC Psychology},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s40359-026-05480-8},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05480-8},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cultural redevelopment and validation of the emotion regulation goals scale – culturally redeveloped version (ERGS-CRV): evidence from Iran
AU  - Maryam Moghadasin
AU  - Kamran Salem
AU  - Lameese Eldesouky
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/29
JO  - BMC Psychology
DO  - 10.1186/s40359-026-05480-8
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05480-8
AB  - Introduction: Emotion regulation goals (ERGs) represent an important yet understudied aspect of self-regulation, particularly in non-Western cultural contexts. Existing measures primarily focus on emotion-regulation strategies, and culturally appropriate instruments for assessing ERGs remain limited. The present study aimed to culturally redevelop and validate the Emotion Regulation Goals Scale – Culturally Redeveloped Version (ERGS-CRV) for use in an Iranian population.  Method: A total of 1,475 Iranian adults (67.9% women; M = 29.86, SD = 10.24; age 18–71) completed the ERGS-CRV. The validation process included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses using split-sample cross-validation, reliability assessment, convergent and discriminant validity analyses, test–retest reliability, and measurement invariance testing across gender groups.  Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a five-factor structure consisting of Pro-Hedonic, Contra-Hedonic, Performance, Pro-Social, and Impression Management dimensions. Reliability estimates ranged from 0.54 to 0.91 across subscales, with stronger internal consistency observed for the Performance, Pro-Social, and Impression Management dimensions. Evidence of convergent validity was strongest for the Pro-Social and Impression Management dimensions, acceptable for the Performance dimension, and comparatively weaker for the Pro-Hedonic and Contra-Hedonic dimensions. Discriminant validity was confirmed using both the Fornell–Larcker criterion and the heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). Test–retest coefficients indicated good to excellent temporal stability. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses supported configural, metric, scalar, and strict measurement invariance across gender groups.  Conclusions: The ERGS-CRV provides a culturally informed measure of emotion-regulation goals in Iranian adults, with stronger psychometric support for the Pro-Social and Impression Management dimensions, acceptable support for the Performance dimension, and comparatively weaker support for the Pro-Hedonic and Contra-Hedonic dimensions. The findings support its use for research on emotion-regulation motives in Persian-speaking and potentially other non-Western populations.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05480-8.
SN  - 2050-7283
ER  -