Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,332 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Short-term subjective and EEG responses following cervical rotatory manipulation are not reproduced by simulated cracking sound: A randomized controlled study

  • Yuanxun Lin1
  • Weixing Zhong2
  • Meiling Yu3
  • Yaoshuai Yu4
  • Lixin Tang
  • Fan Xue
  • Jundan Wei
  • Junhua Li
  • Yikai Li
4 affiliations
  1. 1School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  2. 2Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  3. 3Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
  4. 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Open at sourcePDFDOICite

Abstract

Background: Cervical rotatory manipulation (CRM) is commonly used for neck-related symptoms and is often accompanied by a cracking sound. Whether a simulated cracking sound can reproduce the short-term subjective and neurophysiological responses to the complete CRM remains unclear. Objective: This study compared short-term subjective and electroencephalography (EEG) responses to CRM with those following sham manipulation with or without a simulated cracking sound. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial with three parallel groups and a single intervention session, 54 healthy volunteers were allocated to CRM, sham manipulation, or sham + simulated sound. Positive affect, negative affect, comfort, satisfaction, and eyes closed resting state EEG were assessed before and after the intervention. Prespecified EEG derived outcomes included frontal alpha power, frontal alpha/beta ratio, occipital individual alpha frequency, and alpha band frontoparietal and frontotemporal functional connectivity. Results: CRM produced greater improvements in positive affect, comfort, and satisfaction than sham manipulation or sham + simulated cracking sound, whereas no clear difference among groups was observed for negative affect. Differences among groups were also observed in frontal alpha/beta ratio and alpha band frontoparietal and frontotemporal functional connectivity. Sham + simulated sound did not reproduce the overall pattern of subjective and EEG responses observed after CRM. Conclusions: CRM produced greater improvements over the short-term in positive affect, comfort, and satisfaction and was accompanied by differences in selected resting state EEG outcomes compared with sham manipulation with or without simulated cracking sound. Adding simulated cracking sound to sham manipulation did not reproduce this pattern. Because CRM differed from the control conditions in several procedural components, the specific component or combination of components responsible for these differences could not be determined. Trial registration: The trial was registered with the International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry (URL: https://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn; ITMCTR2025001112).

Related

  1. High-intensity interval versus moderate-intensity continuous freestyle swimming in obese college students: A randomized controlled study protocol examining glycolipid and vascular endothelial responses
    Mei Yang, Jingjing Wang, Xiaoyun Su +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnzymology & metabolismNeurosciencePLOSEurope PMCPMC
  2. Personalized assessment of high-definition slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) in older adults with sleep and subjective cognitive complaints: A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial
    Hanna Lu, Xi Ni, Natalie Shu Yang +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceClinical trials & evidence synthesisPLOS
  3. Green Against the Machine: Natural Environment Exposure Attenuates Subjective and Physiological Responses to Technostress Across Levels of Agency
    Simone Di Plinio, Claudia Greco, David Perpetuini +5
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePhysiologyOSF
  4. Effects of myofascial release on clinical outcomes and muscle viscoelastic properties in patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial
    Özlem Feyzioğlu, Selvi Dinçer, Özgül Öztürk +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCell biologyCrossref
  5. Feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial of a patient-centred transition program for stroke survivors and their caregivers—P-NAVISTROKE study
    Marion Delvallée, Apolline Blazer, Mathilde Marchal +5
    Disability and RehabilitationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{lin2026shortterm,
  title = {{Short-term subjective and EEG responses following cervical rotatory manipulation are not reproduced by simulated cracking sound: A randomized controlled study}},
  author = {Yuanxun Lin and Weixing Zhong and Meiling Yu and Yaoshuai Yu and Lixin Tang and Fan Xue and Jundan Wei and Junhua Li and Yikai Li},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0352526},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352526},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Short-term subjective and EEG responses following cervical rotatory manipulation are not reproduced by simulated cracking sound: A randomized controlled study
AU  - Yuanxun Lin
AU  - Weixing Zhong
AU  - Meiling Yu
AU  - Yaoshuai Yu
AU  - Lixin Tang
AU  - Fan Xue
AU  - Jundan Wei
AU  - Junhua Li
AU  - Yikai Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0352526
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352526
AB  - Background: Cervical rotatory manipulation (CRM) is commonly used for neck-related symptoms and is often accompanied by a cracking sound. Whether a simulated cracking sound can reproduce the short-term subjective and neurophysiological responses to the complete CRM remains unclear. Objective: This study compared short-term subjective and electroencephalography (EEG) responses to CRM with those following sham manipulation with or without a simulated cracking sound. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial with three parallel groups and a single intervention session, 54 healthy volunteers were allocated to CRM, sham manipulation, or sham + simulated sound. Positive affect, negative affect, comfort, satisfaction, and eyes closed resting state EEG were assessed before and after the intervention. Prespecified EEG derived outcomes included frontal alpha power, frontal alpha/beta ratio, occipital individual alpha frequency, and alpha band frontoparietal and frontotemporal functional connectivity. Results: CRM produced greater improvements in positive affect, comfort, and satisfaction than sham manipulation or sham + simulated cracking sound, whereas no clear difference among groups was observed for negative affect. Differences among groups were also observed in frontal alpha/beta ratio and alpha band frontoparietal and frontotemporal functional connectivity. Sham + simulated sound did not reproduce the overall pattern of subjective and EEG responses observed after CRM. Conclusions: CRM produced greater improvements over the short-term in positive affect, comfort, and satisfaction and was accompanied by differences in selected resting state EEG outcomes compared with sham manipulation with or without simulated cracking sound. Adding simulated cracking sound to sham manipulation did not reproduce this pattern. Because CRM differed from the control conditions in several procedural components, the specific component or combination of components responsible for these differences could not be determined. Trial registration: The trial was registered with the International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry (URL: https://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn; ITMCTR2025001112).
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -