Health for all? From lifestyle risk to genomic governance: The enduring logics of individualisation in an age of inequality
- 1Teesside University, UK
Abstract
In 1997, 3 years ahead of WHO’s target of delivering Health for All, critical health scholarship was energised by the mainstreaming of social determinants and the optimism of the new public health. Yet alongside these collective ambitions, lifestyle discourses, rooted in 1970s healthism, proliferated across consumer cultures, framing health as a matter of personal responsibility. Over the past three decades, these individualising logics have intensified. Initially expressed through behavioural risk management, they now extend into molecular and algorithmic regimes, producing the ‘genomic citizen’, tasked with managing biological futures via data-driven infrastructures and market-mediated technologies. Framed as empowering, these paradigms obscure structural determinants and embed health within a political economy of anticipation, where promissory narratives justify investment while deepening responsibilisation. The COVID-19 syndemic exposed the fragility of individualised discourses, reaffirming the salience of systemic inequality. In response, this paper reflects on the concept of metabolic justice, a framework that reframes the relationship between behavioural and biological discourses while foregrounding redistribution, ecological embeddedness and systemic reform. By situating health within networks of exposure and dependency rather than individual optimisation, metabolic justice revives the ambitions of Health for All and its descendants as a materially grounded, politically transformative project for an era of social inequality and stratified medicine.
Related
- From Genomic Data to Genomic Governance: Why Pakistan Needs Responsible Data Sharing?
- Evolving Mechanisms, Enduring Goals: NICHD OPPTB Support for the Science of Therapeutics in Pregnancy and Childhood (2004–Present)
- Enduring or Adaptable? A formal model and meta-analytic test of the stability of personality disorders
- From resilience to sumud: rethinking psychotherapy beyond individual recovery in contexts of enduring adversity
- Lifestyle, Dietary Habits, and Modifiable Risk Factors in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study with Development and Validation of a Composite Lifestyle and Nutrition Questionnaire
BibTeX
@article{crawshaw2026health,
title = {{Health for all? From lifestyle risk to genomic governance: The enduring logics of individualisation in an age of inequality}},
author = {Paul Crawshaw},
journal = {Health (London, England : 1997)},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1177/13634593261473159},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593261473159},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Health for all? From lifestyle risk to genomic governance: The enduring logics of individualisation in an age of inequality
AU - Paul Crawshaw
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/31
JO - Health (London, England : 1997)
DO - 10.1177/13634593261473159
UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593261473159
AB - In 1997, 3 years ahead of WHO’s target of delivering Health for All, critical health scholarship was energised by the mainstreaming of social determinants and the optimism of the new public health. Yet alongside these collective ambitions, lifestyle discourses, rooted in 1970s healthism, proliferated across consumer cultures, framing health as a matter of personal responsibility. Over the past three decades, these individualising logics have intensified. Initially expressed through behavioural risk management, they now extend into molecular and algorithmic regimes, producing the ‘genomic citizen’, tasked with managing biological futures via data-driven infrastructures and market-mediated technologies. Framed as empowering, these paradigms obscure structural determinants and embed health within a political economy of anticipation, where promissory narratives justify investment while deepening responsibilisation. The COVID-19 syndemic exposed the fragility of individualised discourses, reaffirming the salience of systemic inequality. In response, this paper reflects on the concept of metabolic justice, a framework that reframes the relationship between behavioural and biological discourses while foregrounding redistribution, ecological embeddedness and systemic reform. By situating health within networks of exposure and dependency rather than individual optimisation, metabolic justice revives the ambitions of Health for All and its descendants as a materially grounded, politically transformative project for an era of social inequality and stratified medicine.
SN - 1363-4593
SN - 1461-7196
ER -