Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Approximate synthesis of general single-qubit unitaries over the Clifford+√T gate set

Abstract

For the standard Clifford+T gate set, deterministic, ancilla-free synthesis now attains the minimal T-count for general single-qubit unitaries (Morisaki et al., arXiv:2510.05816). The √T gate rotates by half the angle of T, generating a finer lattice of implementable operations. Access to this magic state is expected to lower the cost of deterministic and ancilla-free synthesis of general single-qubit unitaries (Kliuchnikov et al., arXiv:2203.10064), but no direct Clifford+√T algorithm existed for this case. We provide one by extending the integer lattice-point enumeration method of Morisaki et al. We adopt a resource state cost model based on the magic-state catalysis approach of Gidney and Fowler (arXiv:1812.01238). On Haar-random targets synthesized to precisions ranging from ε=10−3 to 10−8, the cost of Clifford+√T circuits scales as 2.4log2(1/ε) compared to 3.0log2(1/ε) for T-count-optimal Clifford+T circuits. Once a one-time catalyst state is amortized, the Clifford+√T circuits are never costlier than their Clifford+T counterparts.

Related

  1. Optimal Quantum-Circuit Synthesis and Implementation of General Unitaries with Parallelized Bitstring-Conditioned Rotations
    Heikki Suominen, Suman Kundu, Heidi Kivijärvi +7
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Efficient learning of Clifford disentanglers and typical t-doped unitaries with exponentially more T gates
    Gerard Aguilar, Sofiene Jerbi, Jens Eisert +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Efficient Fidelity Estimation of General Quantum Resource States via Clifford Circuits
    Shunta Takahashi, Keisuke Fujii
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. A General Composition Theorem for Approximate Degree
    Samruddhi Pednekar, Supartha Podder
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Link-middle-cut lower bounds for Clifford circuit synthesis
    Søren Fuglede Jørgensen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{weiden2026approximate,
  title = {{Approximate synthesis of general single-qubit unitaries over the Clifford+$\sqrtT$ gate set}},
  author = {Mathias Weiden and Jae Won Kim and Justin Kalloor and John Kubiatowicz and Costin Iancu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.16659},
  eprint = {2609.16659},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16659},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Approximate synthesis of general single-qubit unitaries over the Clifford+√T gate set
AU  - Mathias Weiden
AU  - Jae Won Kim
AU  - Justin Kalloor
AU  - John Kubiatowicz
AU  - Costin Iancu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.16659
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16659
AB  - For the standard Clifford+T gate set, deterministic, ancilla-free synthesis now attains the minimal T-count for general single-qubit unitaries (Morisaki et al., arXiv:2510.05816). The √T gate rotates by half the angle of T, generating a finer lattice of implementable operations. Access to this magic state is expected to lower the cost of deterministic and ancilla-free synthesis of general single-qubit unitaries (Kliuchnikov et al., arXiv:2203.10064), but no direct Clifford+√T algorithm existed for this case. We provide one by extending the integer lattice-point enumeration method of Morisaki et al. We adopt a resource state cost model based on the magic-state catalysis approach of Gidney and Fowler (arXiv:1812.01238). On Haar-random targets synthesized to precisions ranging from ε=10^−3 to 10^−8, the cost of Clifford+√T circuits scales as 2.4log_2(1/ε) compared to 3.0log_2(1/ε) for T-count-optimal Clifford+T circuits. Once a one-time catalyst state is amortized, the Clifford+√T circuits are never costlier than their Clifford+T counterparts.
ER  -