How intermittent piped water supplies impact households and coping strategies: A systematic review
12 affiliations
- 1Penn State University
- 2University of Massachusetts Amherst
- 3University of Bristol
- 4UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
- 5Armitage Environmental and Social Consultants
- 6Universidad Nacional de Salta
- 7Arizona State University
- 8University of South Carolina
- 9Centre for Multi-Disciplinary Development Research
- 10North Carolina State University at Raleigh
- 11Pennsylvania State University
- 12University of Miami
Abstract
More than a billion people globally use a piped water system that is an intermittent water supply (IWS), where water is often unavailable from the network. Previous reviews have summarized relationships between IWS, water quality, human health risks, and coping costs. Yet, beyond these documented impacts, IWS bears additional—often invisible—burdens on users comprising both financial and non-financial costs and social and health burdens. We conducted a systematic review to document these burdens by searching databases for publications that described human impacts of IWS and coping or adaptive management strategies at the household or individual level. We used a novel codebook of coping strategies and adaptive management to synthesize 140 studies meeting our inclusion criteria conducted in 36 countries between 1994-2023. The most frequently reported impacts were increased household spending, poor water quality, time lost managing water, livelihood disruptions, and hygiene/sanitation interruptions. We also found evidence of links between IWS and respiratory infections, vector-borne diseases, dietary changes, physical strain and injuries, dehydration, sleep disruption, psychosocial stress, and interpersonal violence. The most common coping strategies were related to water storage, purchasing, and acquisition costs. Unpredictable IWS was most commonly linked to a small set of household impacts. This review demonstrates that the impacts of IWS on households are more diverse than previously synthesized and highlights the importance of interdisciplinary work to support sustainable solutions that mitigate adverse household impacts of IWS systems.
Related
- The Filtration of Public Water-Supplies
- Plant nitrogen acquisition strategies impact ecosystem carbon storage under future climate
- Impact of contrasting silvicultural strategies on broadleaved forest regeneration under various levels of ungulate pressure and changing climate in Belgium
- Strategies for Mitigating the Impact of Ionospheric and Tropospheric Delay on Sentinel‐1 Interferograms in Northwestern Argentina
- Improper solid waste disposal and the risk of urban flooding: impact and management strategies
BibTeX
@article{broyles2026intermittent,
title = {{How intermittent piped water supplies impact households and coping strategies: A systematic review}},
author = {Lauren M T Broyles and Karina A A. Chavarria and Sally Weston and Godfred Amankwaa and Bubala Mwiinga Chimbanga and Lucas Seghezzo and Patrick Thomson and David Fuente and Narayana N Billava and Ayse Ercumen and Emily Kumpel and Asher Y. Rosinger and Amber Wutich and Justin Stoler},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aebbdb},
url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aebbdb},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - How intermittent piped water supplies impact households and coping strategies: A systematic review
AU - Lauren M T Broyles
AU - Karina A A. Chavarria
AU - Sally Weston
AU - Godfred Amankwaa
AU - Bubala Mwiinga Chimbanga
AU - Lucas Seghezzo
AU - Patrick Thomson
AU - David Fuente
AU - Narayana N Billava
AU - Ayse Ercumen
AU - Emily Kumpel
AU - Asher Y. Rosinger
AU - Amber Wutich
AU - Justin Stoler
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Environmental Research Letters
DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/aebbdb
UR - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aebbdb
AB - More than a billion people globally use a piped water system that is an intermittent water supply (IWS), where water is often unavailable from the network. Previous reviews have summarized relationships between IWS, water quality, human health risks, and coping costs. Yet, beyond these documented impacts, IWS bears additional—often invisible—burdens on users comprising both financial and non-financial costs and social and health burdens. We conducted a systematic review to document these burdens by searching databases for publications that described human impacts of IWS and coping or adaptive management strategies at the household or individual level. We used a novel codebook of coping strategies and adaptive management to synthesize 140 studies meeting our inclusion criteria conducted in 36 countries between 1994-2023. The most frequently reported impacts were increased household spending, poor water quality, time lost managing water, livelihood disruptions, and hygiene/sanitation interruptions. We also found evidence of links between IWS and respiratory infections, vector-borne diseases, dietary changes, physical strain and injuries, dehydration, sleep disruption, psychosocial stress, and interpersonal violence. The most common coping strategies were related to water storage, purchasing, and acquisition costs. Unpredictable IWS was most commonly linked to a small set of household impacts. This review demonstrates that the impacts of IWS on households are more diverse than previously synthesized and highlights the importance of interdisciplinary work to support sustainable solutions that mitigate adverse household impacts of IWS systems.
SN - 1748-9326
ER -