Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Psychosocial interventions for school refusal in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Attending school can be emotionally distressing for some children and adolescents. When school attendance becomes difficult for a child and is accompanied by emotional distress, the condition is called school refusal. Contextual factors at the individual, parental, and school levels that interfere with school attendance may complicate school refusal. A 2015 systematic review of psychosocial interventions, including both randomized and non-randomized studies, reported mixed results for treating anxiety in school refusal, while showing promising results for school attendance. No systematic review or meta-analysis restricted to randomized controlled trials, however, has been conducted. We will therefore conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine whether psychosocial interventions reduce anxiety and improve school attendance among school-refusing children and adolescents.

Methods: Our protocol followed the PRISMA-P guideline. We will include individually- and cluster-randomized trials in which most children and adolescents are aged 18 years or younger, are enrolled in primary or secondary education, have exhibited school absence, and received psychosocial interventions for school refusal. Our primary aim is to reduce anxiety and increase school attendance. We will search CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ICTRP. Two reviewers will independently assess the study selection, data extraction, risk of bias in included studies, and reporting bias. We will also investigate heterogeneity and conduct sensitivity analyses. We will present ‘summary of findings’ tables to show the estimated effects and the certainty of the evidence.

Discussion: This will be the first systematic review to include only randomized trials and to broaden the concept of school attendance to capture the child’s engagement with learning in education.

Related

  1. Effectiveness of psychosocial and therapeutic interventions for children and adolescents with adverse childhood experiences: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Meless G. Bore, Julaine Allan, Setognal B. Aychiluhm +4
    JCPP AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  2. School-based mindfulness interventions in children and adolescents: an umbrella review of systematic reviews, with implications for physical education
    Claudia Arreza-Roca, Noelia González-Gálvez
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Effectiveness of multicomponent interventions for children and adolescents with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xinyue Wang, Ju Yang, Jiai Yan +5
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Psychoeducational interventions for children and adolescents with potentially traumatic experiences: a systematic review Intervenciones psicoeducactivas para niños y adolescentes con experiencias potencialmente traumáticas: una revisión sistemática
    Alison Crivelli, Katharina Beck, Süheyla Seker +2
    European journal of psychotraumatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  5. Psychosocial interventions for military personnel with PTSD: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Ioannis Angelakis, Sarah Donegan, Karen Hughes +9
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{sato2026psychosocial,
  title = {{Psychosocial interventions for school refusal in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis}},
  author = {Akira Sato and Yan Luo and Satoshi Funada and Masatsugu Sakata and Motoki Kurumai and Ethan Sahker and Toshi A. Furukawa},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/8p6da_v1},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/8p6da_v1/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Psychosocial interventions for school refusal in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU  - Akira Sato
AU  - Yan Luo
AU  - Satoshi Funada
AU  - Masatsugu Sakata
AU  - Motoki Kurumai
AU  - Ethan Sahker
AU  - Toshi A. Furukawa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/8p6da_v1
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/8p6da_v1/
AB  - Background: Attending school can be emotionally distressing for some children and adolescents. When school attendance becomes difficult for a child and is accompanied by emotional distress, the condition is called school refusal. Contextual factors at the individual, parental, and school levels that interfere with school attendance may complicate school refusal. A 2015 systematic review of psychosocial interventions, including both randomized and non-randomized studies, reported mixed results for treating anxiety in school refusal, while showing promising results for school attendance. No systematic review or meta-analysis restricted to randomized controlled trials, however, has been conducted. We will therefore conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine whether psychosocial interventions reduce anxiety and improve school attendance among school-refusing children and adolescents.  Methods: Our protocol followed the PRISMA-P guideline. We will include individually- and cluster-randomized trials in which most children and adolescents are aged 18 years or younger, are enrolled in primary or secondary education, have exhibited school absence, and received psychosocial interventions for school refusal. Our primary aim is to reduce anxiety and increase school attendance. We will search CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ICTRP. Two reviewers will independently assess the study selection, data extraction, risk of bias in included studies, and reporting bias. We will also investigate heterogeneity and conduct sensitivity analyses. We will present ‘summary of findings’ tables to show the estimated effects and the certainty of the evidence.  Discussion: This will be the first systematic review to include only randomized trials and to broaden the concept of school attendance to capture the child’s engagement with learning in education.
ER  -