Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sample-optimal learning of stabilizer states

Abstract

It is well-known that learning a pure n-qubit stabilizer state |ψ⟩ both requires, and can be accomplished with, access to a number of copies of |ψ⟩ linear in n. However, the precise constant coefficient of this scaling does not appear to have been determined. Here we prove that Lδ(n), the smallest number of copies from which a quantum procedure can identify any stabilizer state with failure probability at most 0<δ<1/8, satisfies n+⌈log2(1/δ)⌉−3≤ Lδ(n)≤ n+⌈log2(1/δ)⌉+4. We present a polynomial-time quantum learning algorithm that saturates this bound, achieving a constant factor improvement in sample-complexity over previously known approaches. As an immediate corollary, we obtain via the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism an algorithm for learning an unknown n-qubit Clifford unitary from 2n+⌈log2(1/δ)⌉+4 queries, the n-dependence of which we show to be optimal. Our proof technique, which involves Fourier analysis on the abelian group ℤ4n × 𝔽2n(n−1)/2, seems to be qualitatively different to previous approaches to stabilizer state learning, and may be of some independent interest; in particular, it admits natural generalisations to further problems in quantum learning theory.

Related

  1. Adaptivity is all you need: Optimal stabilizer learning using just single-copy measurements
    L. Bittel, J. Eisert, W. Gong +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Optimal Stabilizer Testing and Learning with Limited Quantum Memory
    Srinivasan Arunachalam, Louis Schatzki
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Optimal Lower Bound on the Sample Complexity of Coherent Classical Shadows for Mixed States
    Pavel Svetlichnyy
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Nearly Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Fourier-Sparse Boolean Functions
    Zekun Ye
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. A three-eighths upper bound on the stabilizer-rank exponent of face-center magic states
    Samuel Bevins
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chang2026sampleoptimal,
  title = {{Sample-optimal learning of stabilizer states}},
  author = {Rebecca Chang and Matthias C. Caro and Martin Larocca and Maxwell West},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.10974},
  eprint = {2609.10974},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10974},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sample-optimal learning of stabilizer states
AU  - Rebecca Chang
AU  - Matthias C. Caro
AU  - Martin Larocca
AU  - Maxwell West
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.10974
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10974
AB  - It is well-known that learning a pure n-qubit stabilizer state |ψ⟩ both requires, and can be accomplished with, access to a number of copies of |ψ⟩ linear in n. However, the precise constant coefficient of this scaling does not appear to have been determined. Here we prove that L_δ(n), the smallest number of copies from which a quantum procedure can identify any stabilizer state with failure probability at most 0<δ<1/8, satisfies n+⌈log_2(1/δ)⌉−3≤ L_δ(n)≤ n+⌈log_2(1/δ)⌉+4. We present a polynomial-time quantum learning algorithm that saturates this bound, achieving a constant factor improvement in sample-complexity over previously known approaches. As an immediate corollary, we obtain via the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism an algorithm for learning an unknown n-qubit Clifford unitary from 2n+⌈log_2(1/δ)⌉+4 queries, the n-dependence of which we show to be optimal. Our proof technique, which involves Fourier analysis on the abelian group ℤ_4^n × 𝔽_2^n(n−1)/2, seems to be qualitatively different to previous approaches to stabilizer state learning, and may be of some independent interest; in particular, it admits natural generalisations to further problems in quantum learning theory.
ER  -