Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,280 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Differential Privacy of Gradient Descent on Perturbed Objectives

Abstract

Objective perturbation adds a random linear term to a regularized empirical risk and releases the exact perturbed minimizer. We study the finite computation obtained by releasing the N-th iterate of deterministic gradient descent on w↦ F(w;S)+⟨ z,w⟩, where z∼𝒩(0,σ2Id) is drawn once before optimization. For strongly convex and smooth objectives with Lipschitz Hessian, we prove an explicit condition under which the map z↦ wN is a C1-diffeomorphism on the bounded domains used in the privacy argument, with a quantitative lower bound on the smallest singular value of its Jacobian. This permits a direct change-of-variables analysis of the finite iterate. For generalized linear models, the resulting privacy-profile bound has no explicit ambient-dimension factor once the iteration condition holds, and its finite-iteration correction decreases geometrically. By letting the free truncation parameter grow slowly with N, we recover the corresponding exact-minimizer certificate in the limit. We also bound the expected excess empirical risk by dσ2/(2μ) plus a geometrically decreasing optimization term, and transfer the result to population risk without an additional multiplicative condition-number factor in the leading statistical terms.

Related

  1. The Exact Time-Uniform Rate Frontier for Stochastic Gradient Descent on Smooth Convex Objectives
    Ruijie Li, Kang Chen, Tianyu Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  2. Not All Objectives Are Born Equal: Priority-Constrained Descent for Hierarchical Multi-Objective Optimization
    Dara Varam, Mohamed I. Alhajri
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Deflation-Based Spectral Preconditioning for the Conjugate Gradient Method on Perturbed Systems
    Youssef Diouane, Selime Gürol, Oussama Mouhtal +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Finite-Sample Approximation of Hessian-Guided Perturbed Wasserstein Gradient Flows
    Ryotaro Kawata, Atsushi Nitanda, Taiji Suzuki
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Prophet Inequalities under Local Differential Privacy
    Achraf Azize, Mathieu Molina, Hugo Richard +1
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral mathematicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{watkins2026differential,
  title = {{Differential Privacy of Gradient Descent on Perturbed Objectives}},
  author = {Austin Watkins and Raman Arora},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.02716},
  eprint = {2610.02716},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02716},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Differential Privacy of Gradient Descent on Perturbed Objectives
AU  - Austin Watkins
AU  - Raman Arora
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.02716
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02716
AB  - Objective perturbation adds a random linear term to a regularized empirical risk and releases the exact perturbed minimizer. We study the finite computation obtained by releasing the N-th iterate of deterministic gradient descent on w↦ F(w;S)+⟨ z,w⟩, where z∼𝒩(0,σ^2I_d) is drawn once before optimization. For strongly convex and smooth objectives with Lipschitz Hessian, we prove an explicit condition under which the map z↦ w_N is a C^1-diffeomorphism on the bounded domains used in the privacy argument, with a quantitative lower bound on the smallest singular value of its Jacobian. This permits a direct change-of-variables analysis of the finite iterate. For generalized linear models, the resulting privacy-profile bound has no explicit ambient-dimension factor once the iteration condition holds, and its finite-iteration correction decreases geometrically. By letting the free truncation parameter grow slowly with N, we recover the corresponding exact-minimizer certificate in the limit. We also bound the expected excess empirical risk by dσ^2/(2μ) plus a geometrically decreasing optimization term, and transfer the result to population risk without an additional multiplicative condition-number factor in the leading statistical terms.
ER  -