Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Plant Science

Tomato cultivation substrates differ in stage-dependent root zone–rhizosphere coordination and biomass allocation

Abstract

IntroductionCultivation substrates are commonly evaluated from their initial properties or final crop performance, leaving the developmental relationships among root-zone conditions, rhizosphere functioning, and plant responses poorly resolved. We examined how contrasting substrates were associated with changes in these components across tomato development.MethodsTomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. “22B”) was grown in greenhouse soil (SL), a composted pinecone residue substrate (PR), or a peat substrate (PS), with corresponding unplanted controls. Independent destructive sampling was conducted at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 after transplanting. Root-zone physicochemical and nutrient conditions, rhizosphere enzyme activities, root traits, and organ dry matter were assessed across development; rhizosphere dehydrogenase activity, aboveground NO3--N, P, and K accumulation and allocation, and yield-related traits were determined at maturity.ResultsSubstrate effects were strongly stage-dependent. PR generally exhibited higher urease and sucrase activities during early-to-middle development. Fluorescein diacetate hydrolase activity was highest in PR at Weeks 4 and 8, but shifted to PS at Weeks 12 and 16. Throughout the growth cycle, PS generally maintained lower bulk density and higher gravimetric water content. It also exhibited the highest rhizosphere dehydrogenase activity at maturity and accumulated more stem, leaf, fruit, and total plant dry matter during late development, together with greater aboveground NO3--N, P, and K accumulation at maturity. The estimated yield under PS reached 53,657.70 kg ha-1, representing increases of 80.08% over SL (29,796.45 kg·ha-1) and 39.64% over PR (38,425.10 kg·ha-1). After accounting for substrate and developmental stage, significant associations were concentrated primarily between root-zone conditions and belowground biochemical and root responses, whereas total biomass showed no significant association with any single measured root-zone variable.DiscussionThese findings support a developmental-coupling perspective in which cultivation-substrate performance depends on the temporal coordination among root-zone conditions, rhizosphere biochemical functioning, and stage-specific crop demand rather than on static substrate properties alone. This perspective provides a developmental and process-level understanding of substrate-rhizosphere-plant interactions across tomato growth and offers a conceptual basis for stage-specific optimization of substrate selection and water and nutrient management in protected tomato production.

Related

  1. Metagenomic insights into dose-dependent alterations in the tobacco rhizosphere microbiome by pyrroloquinoline quinone
    L. Liu, Y. Liang, J. Cai +6
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  2. Myo10-dependent leading-edge coordination maintains physical coherence of migrating dendritic cells
    Anjelika Gasilina, Paniz Rezvan Sangsari, Natalie M. Badillo +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC0Full textCell biologybioRxivPMC
  3. Robust planar morphogenesis in leaf-like organs requires callose-dependent coordination of division and growth
    W. Lin, S. Hallet, P. Cifrova +7
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textPlant biologybioRxiv
  4. Visuomotor coordination on the road: Low-dimensional representations reveal adaptive, context-dependent reductions in the dimensionality of natural driving behavior
    John Madrid-Carvajal, Shadi Derakhshan, Peter König
    PLOS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceAlgebra & number theoryPLOSPMC
  5. Silicon and Water Deficit Assessment on the Cultivation of Mini Watermelon cv. Sugar Baby in Greenhouse Cultivation
    Marcio Mesquita, Viviane Correia dos Santos, Anderson Luiz Brandão +9
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{chen2026tomato,
  title = {{Tomato cultivation substrates differ in stage-dependent root zone–rhizosphere coordination and biomass allocation}},
  author = {Yu Chen and Yunxue Li and Wenyin Zi and Yuyuan Chai and Jianjun Chen and Jing Shi},
  journal = {Frontiers in Plant Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fpls.2026.1986895},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1986895},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Tomato cultivation substrates differ in stage-dependent root zone–rhizosphere coordination and biomass allocation
AU  - Yu Chen
AU  - Yunxue Li
AU  - Wenyin Zi
AU  - Yuyuan Chai
AU  - Jianjun Chen
AU  - Jing Shi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/09
JO  - Frontiers in Plant Science
DO  - 10.3389/fpls.2026.1986895
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1986895
AB  - IntroductionCultivation substrates are commonly evaluated from their initial properties or final crop performance, leaving the developmental relationships among root-zone conditions, rhizosphere functioning, and plant responses poorly resolved. We examined how contrasting substrates were associated with changes in these components across tomato development.MethodsTomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. “22B”) was grown in greenhouse soil (SL), a composted pinecone residue substrate (PR), or a peat substrate (PS), with corresponding unplanted controls. Independent destructive sampling was conducted at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 after transplanting. Root-zone physicochemical and nutrient conditions, rhizosphere enzyme activities, root traits, and organ dry matter were assessed across development; rhizosphere dehydrogenase activity, aboveground NO3--N, P, and K accumulation and allocation, and yield-related traits were determined at maturity.ResultsSubstrate effects were strongly stage-dependent. PR generally exhibited higher urease and sucrase activities during early-to-middle development. Fluorescein diacetate hydrolase activity was highest in PR at Weeks 4 and 8, but shifted to PS at Weeks 12 and 16. Throughout the growth cycle, PS generally maintained lower bulk density and higher gravimetric water content. It also exhibited the highest rhizosphere dehydrogenase activity at maturity and accumulated more stem, leaf, fruit, and total plant dry matter during late development, together with greater aboveground NO3--N, P, and K accumulation at maturity. The estimated yield under PS reached 53,657.70 kg ha-1, representing increases of 80.08% over SL (29,796.45 kg·ha-1) and 39.64% over PR (38,425.10 kg·ha-1). After accounting for substrate and developmental stage, significant associations were concentrated primarily between root-zone conditions and belowground biochemical and root responses, whereas total biomass showed no significant association with any single measured root-zone variable.DiscussionThese findings support a developmental-coupling perspective in which cultivation-substrate performance depends on the temporal coordination among root-zone conditions, rhizosphere biochemical functioning, and stage-specific crop demand rather than on static substrate properties alone. This perspective provides a developmental and process-level understanding of substrate-rhizosphere-plant interactions across tomato growth and offers a conceptual basis for stage-specific optimization of substrate selection and water and nutrient management in protected tomato production.
SN  - 1664-462X
ER  -