Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Systematic comparison of genetically encoded F-actin probes for visualizing actomyosin dynamics in vivo using C. elegans

  1. 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Abstract

Genetically encoded F-actin probes enable visualization of actin organization and dynamics in living cells, but their performance and effects on cellular function can vary by probe, fluorescent protein, and biological context. Here, we systematically compared three F-actin probes - F-tractin, LifeAct, and Utrophin - fused to mScarlet-I, mNeonGreen, or mStayGold in vivo, using Caenorhabditis elegans. We used single-copy transgenic strains and evaluated fluorescence intensity, photostability, developmental and reproductive outcomes, cytokinetic ring closure, and probe localization across diverse cellular contexts. mStayGold provided the greatest brightness and photostability, making it well suited for long-term time-lapse imaging, whereas mNeonGreen offers an alternative for applications requiring photobleaching. Most of the strains exhibited minimal detectable effects on development and cellular function and outperformed previously generated strains tested. Probe performance varied across tissues and developmental stages. F-tractin generally exhibited lower fluorescence intensity than LifeAct and Utrophin, particularly in embryos. Although the probes largely exhibited subcellular localization patterns consistent with phalloidin staining, differences in their labeling of specific F-actin structures were observed. Together, these results establish a practical framework for selecting genetically encoded F-actin probes for C. elegans, they suggest best candidates for other in vivo systems, and they highlight the importance of considering both fluorescent protein and actin-binding probe when designing live-cell imaging experiments.

Related

  1. Understanding How Actomyosin Dynamics Drive Apical Constriction by Systematically Tagging and Mapping Actin-Binding Proteins
    Pu Zhang, Bailey N. de Jesus, Taylor N. Medwig-Kinney +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textCell biologybioRxivPMC
  2. The Fate and Degradation of Genetically Modified Soybean DNA Along the Soybean Oil Processing Chain: Quantitative Tracking and Comparison of Degumming Methods.
    Yimiao Xia, Mengru Guo, Shengwen Cui +3
    Foods (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  3. Macrophage calcium signaling dynamics revealed using genetically-encoded sensors
    S. B. Chalmers, T. A. Stewart, K. Hughes +13
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  4. Progressive Actomyosin Remodeling Defining a Structured Podocyte Injury Response in Nephrotic Syndrome
    E. Langner, K. Parra, S. Jiang +5
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textCell biologybioRxiv
  5. Septins buffer actomyosin forces to protect the nucleus from genotoxic mechanical stress.
    Franklin Mayca Pozo, Sarah M Butts, Andrew W Schaefer +2
    The Journal of cell biologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedCell biologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{medwigkinney2026systematic,
  title = {{Systematic comparison of genetically encoded F-actin probes for visualizing actomyosin dynamics in vivo using C. elegans}},
  author = {T. N. Medwig-Kinney and P. Zhang and A. Liu and M. E. Werner and N. K. Chana and A. Shaub Maddox and B. Goldstein},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.03.763946},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.03.763946v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Systematic comparison of genetically encoded F-actin probes for visualizing actomyosin dynamics in vivo using C. elegans
AU  - T. N. Medwig-Kinney
AU  - P. Zhang
AU  - A. Liu
AU  - M. E. Werner
AU  - N. K. Chana
AU  - A. Shaub Maddox
AU  - B. Goldstein
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.03.763946
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.03.763946v1
AB  - Genetically encoded F-actin probes enable visualization of actin organization and dynamics in living cells, but their performance and effects on cellular function can vary by probe, fluorescent protein, and biological context. Here, we systematically compared three F-actin probes - F-tractin, LifeAct, and Utrophin - fused to mScarlet-I, mNeonGreen, or mStayGold in vivo, using Caenorhabditis elegans. We used single-copy transgenic strains and evaluated fluorescence intensity, photostability, developmental and reproductive outcomes, cytokinetic ring closure, and probe localization across diverse cellular contexts. mStayGold provided the greatest brightness and photostability, making it well suited for long-term time-lapse imaging, whereas mNeonGreen offers an alternative for applications requiring photobleaching. Most of the strains exhibited minimal detectable effects on development and cellular function and outperformed previously generated strains tested. Probe performance varied across tissues and developmental stages. F-tractin generally exhibited lower fluorescence intensity than LifeAct and Utrophin, particularly in embryos. Although the probes largely exhibited subcellular localization patterns consistent with phalloidin staining, differences in their labeling of specific F-actin structures were observed. Together, these results establish a practical framework for selecting genetically encoded F-actin probes for C. elegans, they suggest best candidates for other in vivo systems, and they highlight the importance of considering both fluorescent protein and actin-binding probe when designing live-cell imaging experiments.
ER  -