Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDInternational journal of colorectal disease

Self-expandable metal stents as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.

  1. 1Division of Gastrointestinal, Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. [email protected].
  2. 2Division of Gastrointestinal, Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Purpose

Acute colorectal obstruction constitutes a surgical emergency in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality when managed with emergency surgery. Although self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) may optimize surgical conditions, concerns remain regarding their long-term oncologic safety.Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 355 patients with obstructive CRC treated between 2014 and 2023, including 65 patients in the SEMS group and 290 in the surgery-alone group. Perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. Propensity score matching and multivariate Cox regression were applied to reduce selection bias and adjust for confounding factors.Results

Patients in the SEMS group had a markedly higher rate of laparoscopic surgery (89.2% vs. 62.8%, p < 0.001) as well as a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.05 ± 5.25 vs. 14.29 ± 11.86 days, p = 0.032). No significant differences were observed in overall postoperative complications, DFS, or OS between the two groups after adjustment. Although a higher crude recurrence rate, particularly intra-abdominal recurrence, was observed in the SEMS group, SEMS placement was not an independent predictor of adverse oncologic outcomes.Conclusion

SEMS as a bridge to surgery was associated with improved perioperative outcomes and showed no statistically significant adverse impact on long-term survival after adjustment for confounding factors. Further prospective studies are required to confirm oncologic safety in selected patients.

Related

  1. Echinococcus granulosus Genotype and Surgical Outcomes After Cystic Echinococcosis Surgery: A Propensity-Score-Adjusted Retrospective Pilot Cohort Study
    Mehmet Kadir Bartın, Müge Kara
    Tropical medicine and infectious diseasePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Esketamine as a Perineural Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study
    Kang Wang, Lu Xue, Xue-Cheng Meng +4
    Drug Design, Development and TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJPMC
  3. Risk factors for perioperative venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery : A single-center retrospective study
    Hiroe Kitahara, Masaki Yoshimura, Yukihiko Karasawa
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  4. Comparative outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional minilaparotomy-assisted specimen extraction in colorectal cancer: A single-center retrospective study.
    Yongjian Liao, Runfeng Qiu, Wenli Ma
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. The Relationship Between Primary Colorectal Cancer Tumour Characteristics and Patient Outcomes Following Surgery for Oligometastatic Pulmonary Metastases: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
    Anam Asad, Marcus Taylor, Thomas Craze +8
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{chen2026selfexpandable,
  title = {{Self-expandable metal stents as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.}},
  author = {Jian-Jun Chen and Zhu-Lin Li and Yong Yang and Zhen-Jun Wang},
  journal = {International journal of colorectal disease},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1007/s00384-026-05207-6},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907686},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Self-expandable metal stents as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.
AU  - Jian-Jun Chen
AU  - Zhu-Lin Li
AU  - Yong Yang
AU  - Zhen-Jun Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/27
JO  - International journal of colorectal disease
DO  - 10.1007/s00384-026-05207-6
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907686
AB  - Purpose  Acute colorectal obstruction constitutes a surgical emergency in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality when managed with emergency surgery. Although self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) may optimize surgical conditions, concerns remain regarding their long-term oncologic safety.Methods  This retrospective cohort study included 355 patients with obstructive CRC treated between 2014 and 2023, including 65 patients in the SEMS group and 290 in the surgery-alone group. Perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. Propensity score matching and multivariate Cox regression were applied to reduce selection bias and adjust for confounding factors.Results  Patients in the SEMS group had a markedly higher rate of laparoscopic surgery (89.2% vs. 62.8%, p < 0.001) as well as a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.05 ± 5.25 vs. 14.29 ± 11.86 days, p = 0.032). No significant differences were observed in overall postoperative complications, DFS, or OS between the two groups after adjustment. Although a higher crude recurrence rate, particularly intra-abdominal recurrence, was observed in the SEMS group, SEMS placement was not an independent predictor of adverse oncologic outcomes.Conclusion  SEMS as a bridge to surgery was associated with improved perioperative outcomes and showed no statistically significant adverse impact on long-term survival after adjustment for confounding factors. Further prospective studies are required to confirm oncologic safety in selected patients.
SN  - 0179-1958
SN  - 1432-1262
ER  -