Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Quantum error-correcting code parameters, checkable by a certificate of provable size

Abstract

Quantum error correction protects quantum information by encoding it in a code described by three numbers: how many physical qubits it uses, how many logical qubits it protects, and the smallest error it cannot detect. The last is an optimum over exponentially many candidates, so it is read off a solver rather than checked. Here we show that code parameters can be certified by a short certificate, a list or a pairing or a symbolic instance, whose correctness the kernel of a proof assistant decides by computation, and whose size is itself a theorem rather than an estimate. Two published code families have distances settled here: the bivariate bicycle code's $[[144,12,12]]$, certified, and the affine-permutation codes printed at [[1152,580,≤ 12]] and [[2304,1156,≤ 14]], settled at twelve and fourteen. Eleven code families and thirty-nine parameter sets follow, with nothing beyond three standard axioms trusted and the pipeline's specification step preset to twenty columns.

Related

  1. Provable Quantum-Classical Separation for Continuous Gibbs Sampling
    Enrico Olivucci, Mariia Sobchuk, Sehmimul Hoque +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. A provable quantum advantage for approximate optimization via decoded quantum interferometry
    Maximilian J. Kramer, Elies Gil-Fuster, Benjamin D. M. Jones +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Provable Classical and Quantum Local Algorithms for Max-k-Cut and Quantum Advantage at Moderate Girth
    Anuj Apte, Abid Khan, Edward Farhi +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Chern-number estimation: nearly optimal quantum algorithm and provable quantum speedup
    Soichiro Imamura, Shintaro Ae, Kazuki Sakamoto +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Near-Optimal Separations of Certificate Complexity from Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity
    Andris Ambainis, Jānis Iraids, Martins Kokainis
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{an2026quantum,
  title = {{Quantum error-correcting code parameters, checkable by a certificate of provable size}},
  author = {Shuoming An and Fusheng Yang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.03214},
  eprint = {2610.03214},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03214},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantum error-correcting code parameters, checkable by a certificate of provable size
AU  - Shuoming An
AU  - Fusheng Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.03214
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03214
AB  - Quantum error correction protects quantum information by encoding it in a code described by three numbers: how many physical qubits it uses, how many logical qubits it protects, and the smallest error it cannot detect. The last is an optimum over exponentially many candidates, so it is read off a solver rather than checked. Here we show that code parameters can be certified by a short certificate, a list or a pairing or a symbolic instance, whose correctness the kernel of a proof assistant decides by computation, and whose size is itself a theorem rather than an estimate. Two published code families have distances settled here: the bivariate bicycle code's $[[144,12,12]]$, certified, and the affine-permutation codes printed at [[1152,580,≤ 12]] and [[2304,1156,≤ 14]], settled at twelve and fourteen. Eleven code families and thirty-nine parameter sets follow, with nothing beyond three standard axioms trusted and the pipeline's specification step preset to twenty columns.
ER  -