Investigating Outcome Types and Betting Strategies in Roulette: A Simulation Study.
- 1University of Lincoln, College of Science and Health, School of Psychology, Sport Science and Wellbeing, Lincoln, UK, [email protected].
- 2King's College London, National Addiction Centre, London, UK.
- 3Loughborough University, School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences, Loughborough, UK.
Abstract
Introduction
Roulette has not received as significant attention in research as other forms of gambling. Where roulette has, betting style is often constrained, reducing ecological validity. The present study sought to understand different betting strategies, potential outcome distributions, and implications for research.Methods
To build an understanding of the frequency of types of outcomes in roulette, the present research used a virtual roulette game to simulate 22,000 spins on a roulette wheel across 11 different betting strategies. There is the potential for 17 different outcome types for roulette: win, loss, loss disguised as a win, and 14 different types of near miss.Results
Across the 11 different strategies, the rates of the different outcomes varied from being the minority to the majority outcomes. These data showed that roulette outcomes vary significantly as a function of betting strategy and that certain outcomes may not be encountered. However, the amount earned over the strategies did not differ from their starting value.Conclusions
Experimental research cannot allow participants to gamble organically and simultaneously retain experimental control over outcome distribution. Therefore, for roulette studies, researchers have three potential options: (1) To use pre-determined outcome sequences with restricted betting choices; (2) use a pseudo-randomised sequence with programmed percentages of outcomes that allows ecologically valid betting but using a larger number of trials; (3) use a random sequence and control for outcome variance using via statistical analysis. This study demonstrates factors researchers must consider when balancing experimental control and ecological validity in experimental roulette tasks.
Related
- Investigating potential molecular mechanisms linking 6PPD-quinone exposure to Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: A network toxicology, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation study
- Investigating the dynamic interactions between CAR-T cells and the tumor microenvironment: intelligent regulation strategies
- Investigating strategies to enhance access to HIV services among children in Malawi: A multifaceted research approach, study protocol
- Investigating the role of drama-based strategies in addressing psychological trauma: a systematic review.
- Early complications and long-term outcome of patients treated with a Subcutaneous Cardioverter-Defibrillator: temporal trends and clinical implications of the anesthetic strategies adopted at implant
BibTeX
@article{kingparker2026investigating,
title = {{Investigating Outcome Types and Betting Strategies in Roulette: A Simulation Study.}},
author = {Matthew King-Parker and Steve Sharman},
journal = {European addiction research},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1159/ear/acrag004},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42879344},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Investigating Outcome Types and Betting Strategies in Roulette: A Simulation Study.
AU - Matthew King-Parker
AU - Steve Sharman
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/15
JO - European addiction research
DO - 10.1159/ear/acrag004
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42879344
AB - Introduction Roulette has not received as significant attention in research as other forms of gambling. Where roulette has, betting style is often constrained, reducing ecological validity. The present study sought to understand different betting strategies, potential outcome distributions, and implications for research.Methods To build an understanding of the frequency of types of outcomes in roulette, the present research used a virtual roulette game to simulate 22,000 spins on a roulette wheel across 11 different betting strategies. There is the potential for 17 different outcome types for roulette: win, loss, loss disguised as a win, and 14 different types of near miss.Results Across the 11 different strategies, the rates of the different outcomes varied from being the minority to the majority outcomes. These data showed that roulette outcomes vary significantly as a function of betting strategy and that certain outcomes may not be encountered. However, the amount earned over the strategies did not differ from their starting value.Conclusions Experimental research cannot allow participants to gamble organically and simultaneously retain experimental control over outcome distribution. Therefore, for roulette studies, researchers have three potential options: (1) To use pre-determined outcome sequences with restricted betting choices; (2) use a pseudo-randomised sequence with programmed percentages of outcomes that allows ecologically valid betting but using a larger number of trials; (3) use a random sequence and control for outcome variance using via statistical analysis. This study demonstrates factors researchers must consider when balancing experimental control and ecological validity in experimental roulette tasks.
SN - 1022-6877
SN - 1421-9891
ER -