Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCBMJ neurology open

Efficacy and safety of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat in Japanese adults with late-onset Pompe disease: a case series from clinical trials.

7 affiliations
  1. 1Division of Gene Therapy, Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, ISEIKAI International General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  3. 3Division of Child Neurology, Institute of Neurological Science, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan.
  4. 4Department of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
  5. 5BioMarin Pharmaceutical Japan K.K, Tokyo, Japan.
  6. 6Amicus Therapeutics UK Ltd, Marlow, UK.
  7. 7BioMarin UK Ltd, London, UK.

Abstract

Background

The safety and efficacy of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat (cipa+mig) versus alglucosidase alfa plus placebo (alg+pbo) in late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) were established in the randomised, double-blind, 52-week PROPEL study (NCT03729362) conducted across 24 countries, including Japan. An open-label extension (OLE; NCT04138277) is evaluating long-term cipa+mig outcomes. In Japan, cipa+mig was also available before marketing authorisation in an expanded access study (ATB200-19). This case series summarises the efficacy and safety of cipa+mig in Japanese patients in PROPEL, PROPEL OLE and ATB200-19.Methods

Endpoints included 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), forced vital capacity (FVC), biomarkers and safety. Cipa+mig (20 mg/kg intravenous cipa and 130-260 mg oral mig (weight-based dosing)) and alg+pbo (20 mg/kg intravenous alg and oral pbo) were given biweekly. Patients randomised to alg+pbo in PROPEL received cipa+mig in the OLE. Safety was assessed at every visit, and biomarkers at weeks 2, 4, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52 and every 26 weeks thereafter.Results

Six patients from PROPEL/OLE (cipa+mig, n=2; alg+pbo, n=4; all enrolled in the OLE) and four from ATB200-19 were included. Two patients discontinued treatment: one in the OLE (anaphylactic reaction) and one in ATB200-19 (withdrawal of consent). For evaluable patients (n=8), 6MWD remained stable or improved from baseline to weeks 52 and 104. In PROPEL/OLE, FVC varied with most patients improving with cipa+mig treatment; in ATB200-19, FVC remained stable to week 104. In PROPEL/OLE and ATB200-19, biomarker levels improved or stabilised by week 104, including in the PROPEL switch group, where levels worsened at week 52 but improved after switching to cipa+mig. Seven patients experienced treatment-related adverse events. No deaths occurred.Conclusions

Although the number of patients was small, the efficacy and safety of cipa+mig in Japanese patients from PROPEL/OLE and ATB200-19 were generally sustained and durable responses consistent with positive results in the overall PROPEL population.

Related

  1. Safety and Efficacy of HarmonyTM Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation ― Clinical and Hemodynamic Assessment in a Single-Center Japanese Cohort ―
    Tomohito Kogure, Daigo Yagishita, Takanori Kawamoto +10
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthJ-STAGE
  2. Miglustat in Neuronopathic Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Biological Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Limits of Repurposing
    Patryk Lipiński, Grzegorz Węgrzyn
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PhysiologyCrossref
  3. Clinical characterization of Japanese children with Cushing’s disease
    Mari Yamamoto, Yuri Mukoyama, Kentaro Kishi +12
    Endocrine JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEndocrinology & metabolismJ-STAGE
  4. Short-term clinical efficacy and recorded adverse events of semaglutide combined with dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease
    Cheng Gong, Qiong Luo, Qin Li
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Preclinical-Clinical Discrepancies in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Disease Stage, Antibody Properties, Biomarker Alignment, and Model Limitations.
    Yuwei Zhang, Hla Paing, Jing Wang
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{kobayashi2026efficacy,
  title = {{Efficacy and safety of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat in Japanese adults with late-onset Pompe disease: a case series from clinical trials.}},
  author = {Hiroshi Kobayashi and Aya Narita and Michi Kawamoto and Junjiro Saeki and Ryan Graham and William Kerr},
  journal = {BMJ neurology open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1136/bmjno-2025-001480},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921145},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Efficacy and safety of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat in Japanese adults with late-onset Pompe disease: a case series from clinical trials.
AU  - Hiroshi Kobayashi
AU  - Aya Narita
AU  - Michi Kawamoto
AU  - Junjiro Saeki
AU  - Ryan Graham
AU  - William Kerr
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - BMJ neurology open
DO  - 10.1136/bmjno-2025-001480
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921145
AB  - Background  The safety and efficacy of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat (cipa+mig) versus alglucosidase alfa plus placebo (alg+pbo) in late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) were established in the randomised, double-blind, 52-week PROPEL study (NCT03729362) conducted across 24 countries, including Japan. An open-label extension (OLE; NCT04138277) is evaluating long-term cipa+mig outcomes. In Japan, cipa+mig was also available before marketing authorisation in an expanded access study (ATB200-19). This case series summarises the efficacy and safety of cipa+mig in Japanese patients in PROPEL, PROPEL OLE and ATB200-19.Methods  Endpoints included 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), forced vital capacity (FVC), biomarkers and safety. Cipa+mig (20 mg/kg intravenous cipa and 130-260 mg oral mig (weight-based dosing)) and alg+pbo (20 mg/kg intravenous alg and oral pbo) were given biweekly. Patients randomised to alg+pbo in PROPEL received cipa+mig in the OLE. Safety was assessed at every visit, and biomarkers at weeks 2, 4, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52 and every 26 weeks thereafter.Results  Six patients from PROPEL/OLE (cipa+mig, n=2; alg+pbo, n=4; all enrolled in the OLE) and four from ATB200-19 were included. Two patients discontinued treatment: one in the OLE (anaphylactic reaction) and one in ATB200-19 (withdrawal of consent). For evaluable patients (n=8), 6MWD remained stable or improved from baseline to weeks 52 and 104. In PROPEL/OLE, FVC varied with most patients improving with cipa+mig treatment; in ATB200-19, FVC remained stable to week 104. In PROPEL/OLE and ATB200-19, biomarker levels improved or stabilised by week 104, including in the PROPEL switch group, where levels worsened at week 52 but improved after switching to cipa+mig. Seven patients experienced treatment-related adverse events. No deaths occurred.Conclusions  Although the number of patients was small, the efficacy and safety of cipa+mig in Japanese patients from PROPEL/OLE and ATB200-19 were generally sustained and durable responses consistent with positive results in the overall PROPEL population.
SN  - 2632-6140
ER  -