Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Genomic Correlates of APOBEC-Associated Mutagenesis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  1. 1University of Cape Coast

Abstract

Background and Aims: APOBEC-associated mutagenesis is prominent in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but genomic features associated with its intertumoral variability remain incompletely characterized. We investigated genomic correlates of APOBEC-associated mutagenesis while accounting for the compositional structure of mutational signature data. Methods: Mutational signatures were analyzed in 552 ESCC tumors from eight countries. APOBEC-associated mutagenesis was quantified as SBS2 plus SBS13 using absolute mutation counts and proportional contributions. Associations with co-occurring mutational signatures, total SBS burden, recurrent driver-gene alterations, and country were evaluated using correlation, sensitivity, and multivariable analyses. Principal component and regression-model robustness were additionally assessed. Results: APOBEC burden varied markedly across tumors (median, 2,002 mutations; IQR, 987-4,346). Several associations observed using signature proportions were not maintained in absolute-count analyses: SBS1, SBS3, and SBS5 changed direction, indicating sensitivity to compositional representation. In contrast, SBS18 remained inversely associated with APOBEC-associated mutagenesis in all variable pairings examined: proportion versus proportion (Spearman rho = -0.527), APOBEC proportion versus SBS18 absolute count (r = -0.435), and absolute count versus absolute count (Pearson r = -0.319, P = 1.59 x 10^-14; Spearman rho = -0.317). These are distinct comparisons rather than discrepant estimates. Notably, this cohort-wide relationship was primarily characterized by higher APOBEC burden in SBS18-negative than SBS18-positive tumors rather than a continuous inverse relationship among SBS18-positive tumors. The multivariable model had an in-sample R^2 of 0.400 but lower and variable 10-fold cross-validated performance (mean R^2 = 0.273). Country added little explanatory information to this model (delta R^2 = 0.008; global P = 0.402). ZNF750-mutant tumors had higher APOBEC burden than wild-type tumors (BH-FDR q = 0.0032), although only 12 tumors carried ZNF750 alterations. Conclusion: Genomic correlates of APOBEC-associated mutagenesis in ESCC are sensitive to the representation of mutational signature activity. SBS18 showed the most consistent inverse association, whereas the ZNF750 association warrants independent validation.

Related

  1. Stromal CD163-positive Macrophage Enrichment Is Associated With a FOXP3-skewed Immune Profile and Poor Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    WENPENG JIAO, FEI LV, XUDI LIU +3
    Cancer Genomics & ProteomicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textImmunologyPMC
  2. Huayu Wan induces ferroptosis and enhances anti-PD-1 efficacy in cisplatin-resistant esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Ting Zhu, Bin Wang, Haiyong Wang +7
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ImmunologyCrossref
  3. Shenling Qige Granules inhibit esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression in TE-1 xenograft and cell-based models by modulating the DCN–TGF-β/Smad signaling axis
    Zihui Liu, Yiting Gu, Huanfang Fan +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyOncologyPLOS
  4. GTSE1 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma stemness via the Hippo signaling pathway.
    Yujie Xie, Dongmei Lai, Hao Hu +4
    Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCell biologyEurope PMCPMC
  5. Exploratory integrated analysis of the microbiome and host transcriptome reveals correlations between the intratumoral microbiota and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Kai Yang, Shengliang He, Qi Wang +5
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0MicrobiologyFrontiersCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{ansah2026genomic,
  title = {{Genomic Correlates of APOBEC-Associated Mutagenesis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma}},
  author = {E. O. Ansah and J. A. Yentumi and E. Y. Kodom and P. O. Mensah and K. Fosu and I. K. Adu and E. A. Boahen},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.27.762354},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.762354v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Genomic Correlates of APOBEC-Associated Mutagenesis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
AU  - E. O. Ansah
AU  - J. A. Yentumi
AU  - E. Y. Kodom
AU  - P. O. Mensah
AU  - K. Fosu
AU  - I. K. Adu
AU  - E. A. Boahen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.27.762354
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.762354v1
AB  - Background and Aims: APOBEC-associated mutagenesis is prominent in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but genomic features associated with its intertumoral variability remain incompletely characterized. We investigated genomic correlates of APOBEC-associated mutagenesis while accounting for the compositional structure of mutational signature data. Methods: Mutational signatures were analyzed in 552 ESCC tumors from eight countries. APOBEC-associated mutagenesis was quantified as SBS2 plus SBS13 using absolute mutation counts and proportional contributions. Associations with co-occurring mutational signatures, total SBS burden, recurrent driver-gene alterations, and country were evaluated using correlation, sensitivity, and multivariable analyses. Principal component and regression-model robustness were additionally assessed. Results: APOBEC burden varied markedly across tumors (median, 2,002 mutations; IQR, 987-4,346). Several associations observed using signature proportions were not maintained in absolute-count analyses: SBS1, SBS3, and SBS5 changed direction, indicating sensitivity to compositional representation. In contrast, SBS18 remained inversely associated with APOBEC-associated mutagenesis in all variable pairings examined: proportion versus proportion (Spearman rho = -0.527), APOBEC proportion versus SBS18 absolute count (r = -0.435), and absolute count versus absolute count (Pearson r = -0.319, P = 1.59 x 10^-14; Spearman rho = -0.317). These are distinct comparisons rather than discrepant estimates. Notably, this cohort-wide relationship was primarily characterized by higher APOBEC burden in SBS18-negative than SBS18-positive tumors rather than a continuous inverse relationship among SBS18-positive tumors. The multivariable model had an in-sample R^2 of 0.400 but lower and variable 10-fold cross-validated performance (mean R^2 = 0.273). Country added little explanatory information to this model (delta R^2 = 0.008; global P = 0.402). ZNF750-mutant tumors had higher APOBEC burden than wild-type tumors (BH-FDR q = 0.0032), although only 12 tumors carried ZNF750 alterations. Conclusion: Genomic correlates of APOBEC-associated mutagenesis in ESCC are sensitive to the representation of mutational signature activity. SBS18 showed the most consistent inverse association, whereas the ZNF750 association warrants independent validation.
ER  -