Are implicit schemes needed in adaptive time stepping for PDEs?
Abstract
Implicit time integration is the standard way to overcome the tight CFL time step restriction when solving nonstationary PDEs numerically. However, within an adaptive time accurate integration, the time step size selection is governed not only by stability but also by accuracy requirements. Therefore, an eligible question to ask is: is (unconditionally) stable implicit time stepping really needed if the time step is restricted by accuracy considerations anyway? And how much do we then lose (in terms of the time step size) when switching from the expensive implicit time stepping to stabilized explicit schemes? An answer to this question is also important because such a switch is often done when solving large scale nonstationary PDEs on massively parallel computers. This paper attempts to answer these questions by numerical tests for two particular adaptive time accurate settings: (i)~nonstationary convection-diffusion equations and (ii)~nonlinear heat equations.
Related
- When Is Local Time Stepping Worthwhile? A Cost Analysis for Nested Adaptive Mesh Refinement
- Linear adaptive variable time step schemes for the anisotropic phase field dendritic crystal growth model
- Well-balanced semi-implicit relaxed finite volume schemes for hyperbolic balance laws
- GPU-Accelerated Nested Schur-Complement Solvers for Atmospheric Flow Simulations Using Horizontally-Explicit, Vertically-Implicit Schemes and Discontinuous Galerkin Methods
- Flux vector splittings and semi-implicit finite volume schemes for an isentropic two-phase flow model
BibTeX
@misc{botchev2026implicit,
title = {{Are implicit schemes needed in adaptive time stepping for PDEs?}},
author = {Mikhail A. Botchev},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.14884},
eprint = {2610.14884},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14884},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Are implicit schemes needed in adaptive time stepping for PDEs?
AU - Mikhail A. Botchev
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/10
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.14884
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14884
AB - Implicit time integration is the standard way to overcome the tight CFL time step restriction when solving nonstationary PDEs numerically. However, within an adaptive time accurate integration, the time step size selection is governed not only by stability but also by accuracy requirements. Therefore, an eligible question to ask is: is (unconditionally) stable implicit time stepping really needed if the time step is restricted by accuracy considerations anyway? And how much do we then lose (in terms of the time step size) when switching from the expensive implicit time stepping to stabilized explicit schemes? An answer to this question is also important because such a switch is often done when solving large scale nonstationary PDEs on massively parallel computers. This paper attempts to answer these questions by numerical tests for two particular adaptive time accurate settings: (i)~nonstationary convection-diffusion equations and (ii)~nonlinear heat equations.
ER -