Reachability-Based Safe-Start Regions for Approach to a Tumbling Target with Rotating LOS Constraints
Abstract
This paper presents a closed-form test that decides, before the maneuver begins, whether a chaser can reach and hold station at the hold point of a tumbling, uncooperative target inside a line-of-sight (LOS) corridor that turns with the target. A closed-loop controller cannot answer this question: a receding-horizon controller checks the corridor only over its prediction horizon, and near a tumbling target the corridor sweeps past faster than bounded thrust can follow, so a start that is feasible at the first step can become unrecoverable later. Today the only ways to know are to fly the controller in simulation or to compute a Hamilton--Jacobi reachable set, both too slow onboard. The test combines two criteria derived from bounded-thrust relative orbital dynamics: a directional erosion margin, the corridor margin that rotation-induced drift consumes before the thruster arrests it, and a synchronization radius, beyond which the apparent rotational velocity cannot be cancelled. Guidance pairs a three-regime tracking law with a receding-horizon quadratic program. Benchmarked against polytopic backward and forward reachable sets, Hamilton--Jacobi level sets and closed-loop Monte Carlo simulation, the test runs over two orders of magnitude faster than Hamilton--Jacobi and, over 500 closed-loop cases, predicts feasibility with 91% recall and 80% precision. The gap to Hamilton--Jacobi is structural, not a method error: reaching the hold point and co-rotating with it is a stronger requirement than arriving with arbitrary velocity, and the gap widens with tumble rate. The test therefore gives an onboard go/no-go answer where Hamilton--Jacobi reachability is too expensive.
Related
- Mapping Wolf-Rayet winds with spectro-interferometry I. Detection of multiple co-rotating interaction regions in WR 6
- Potential Cryovolcanic Regions on Ganymede: A Priority Target for JUICE
- B-fields In STar-forming Region Observations (BISTRO): Dual-Wavelength Constraints on Size-Dependent Grain Alignment in Star-Forming Regions
- From Rock Tumbling to Telescope Mirror Grinding: How Optical Perfection Emerges from Random Motion
- Dark Matter Halo Tumbling Induced by Torques from Massive Mergers
BibTeX
@misc{iskender2026reachabilitybased,
title = {{Reachability-Based Safe-Start Regions for Approach to a Tumbling Target with Rotating LOS Constraints}},
author = {Omer Burak Iskender and Keck Voon Ling and Wee Seng Lim and Erick Lansard},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.02128},
eprint = {2607.02128},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02128},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Reachability-Based Safe-Start Regions for Approach to a Tumbling Target with Rotating LOS Constraints
AU - Omer Burak Iskender
AU - Keck Voon Ling
AU - Wee Seng Lim
AU - Erick Lansard
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/13
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.02128
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02128
AB - This paper presents a closed-form test that decides, before the maneuver begins, whether a chaser can reach and hold station at the hold point of a tumbling, uncooperative target inside a line-of-sight (LOS) corridor that turns with the target. A closed-loop controller cannot answer this question: a receding-horizon controller checks the corridor only over its prediction horizon, and near a tumbling target the corridor sweeps past faster than bounded thrust can follow, so a start that is feasible at the first step can become unrecoverable later. Today the only ways to know are to fly the controller in simulation or to compute a Hamilton--Jacobi reachable set, both too slow onboard. The test combines two criteria derived from bounded-thrust relative orbital dynamics: a directional erosion margin, the corridor margin that rotation-induced drift consumes before the thruster arrests it, and a synchronization radius, beyond which the apparent rotational velocity cannot be cancelled. Guidance pairs a three-regime tracking law with a receding-horizon quadratic program. Benchmarked against polytopic backward and forward reachable sets, Hamilton--Jacobi level sets and closed-loop Monte Carlo simulation, the test runs over two orders of magnitude faster than Hamilton--Jacobi and, over 500 closed-loop cases, predicts feasibility with 91% recall and 80% precision. The gap to Hamilton--Jacobi is structural, not a method error: reaching the hold point and co-rotating with it is a stronger requirement than arriving with arbitrary velocity, and the gap widens with tumble rate. The test therefore gives an onboard go/no-go answer where Hamilton--Jacobi reachability is too expensive.
ER -