Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Response representation shapes AlphaGenome enhancer-gene prediction in human astrocytes

  1. 1University of Washington

Abstract

Background: Sequence-to-function models predict regulatory perturbation responses, but their added value beyond established enhancer-gene predictors and across prediction tasks remains unclear. We evaluated whole-enhancer deletion and sparse variant responses in human astrocytes. Results: We analyzed 2,307 CRISPR-interference-tested relations, including 133 expression-decreasing hits. Adding deletion responses increased fully nested EGrf average precision from 0.5475 to 0.6137. The paired increment was 0.0662 (enhancer-cluster 95% interval 0.0144-0.1181). In a separate exploratory analysis, sparse Atlas responses were combined with seven-input logistic and random-forest comparators by equal-weight rank fusion. Atlas magnitude fusion exceeded absolute-deletion fusion by 0.0519 and 0.0637 in average precision. Enhancer-cluster 95% intervals were 0.0098-0.0957 and 0.0220-0.1094, respectively. Standalone Atlas magnitude reached average precision 0.5570, but its advantage over absolute deletion remained uncertain. Signed Atlas fusion performed worse than either comparator alone. Incremental value for within-enhancer target choice and in the external WTC11 MHC evaluation remained uncertain. The reported performance intervals use one-way clustering of fixed predictions; Atlas analyses were exploratory within the same cohort. Conclusions: In AstroREG, whole-enhancer deletion responses increased observed retrieval performance beyond a fully nested chromatin-based predictor. Sparse variant responses were more informative as magnitudes than as signed averages. Improved within-enhancer target choice and external transfer were not established.

Related

  1. AlphaGenome informed machine learning for pathogenicity prediction of germline mutations
    P. Kumar, S. Singh, S. Garai +8
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  2. A biological-response compound representation allows chemical perturbation prediction across cell lines
    L. Le Breton, L. Kaufmann, E. Carraz-Billat +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  3. Scooby-2: fine-tuning AlphaGenome for single-cell genomic track prediction
    J. C. Hingerl, J. Gagneur
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  4. Characterisation of cis-regulatory elements and genome wide enhancer prediction in Heliconiini butterflies
    A. D. Ritchie, F. Cicconardi, S. H. Montgomery
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  5. Tri-Modality Representation Learning for Molecular Property Prediction
    A. zhao, J. Li
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{huang2026response,
  title = {{Response representation shapes AlphaGenome enhancer-gene prediction in human astrocytes}},
  author = {Z. Huang and R. Huang and J. Han},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.08.14.744988},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.14.744988v2},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Response representation shapes AlphaGenome enhancer-gene prediction in human astrocytes
AU  - Z. Huang
AU  - R. Huang
AU  - J. Han
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/14
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.08.14.744988
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.14.744988v2
AB  - Background: Sequence-to-function models predict regulatory perturbation responses, but their added value beyond established enhancer-gene predictors and across prediction tasks remains unclear. We evaluated whole-enhancer deletion and sparse variant responses in human astrocytes. Results: We analyzed 2,307 CRISPR-interference-tested relations, including 133 expression-decreasing hits. Adding deletion responses increased fully nested EGrf average precision from 0.5475 to 0.6137. The paired increment was 0.0662 (enhancer-cluster 95% interval 0.0144-0.1181). In a separate exploratory analysis, sparse Atlas responses were combined with seven-input logistic and random-forest comparators by equal-weight rank fusion. Atlas magnitude fusion exceeded absolute-deletion fusion by 0.0519 and 0.0637 in average precision. Enhancer-cluster 95% intervals were 0.0098-0.0957 and 0.0220-0.1094, respectively. Standalone Atlas magnitude reached average precision 0.5570, but its advantage over absolute deletion remained uncertain. Signed Atlas fusion performed worse than either comparator alone. Incremental value for within-enhancer target choice and in the external WTC11 MHC evaluation remained uncertain. The reported performance intervals use one-way clustering of fixed predictions; Atlas analyses were exploratory within the same cohort. Conclusions: In AstroREG, whole-enhancer deletion responses increased observed retrieval performance beyond a fully nested chromatin-based predictor. Sparse variant responses were more informative as magnitudes than as signed averages. Improved within-enhancer target choice and external transfer were not established.
ER  -