Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

EntroPrefill: Renyi-Guided Context Pruning with Conditional Stability Guarantees for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Abstract

Mid-prefill pruning can reduce the sequence processed by deeper transformer layers, but attention concentration alone does not certify that discarded context is dispensable. We formulate EntroPrefill as a Renyi-guided proposal mechanism coupled to explicit constraints on discarded attention mass. Sink-isolated, regularized head pooling respects grouped-query attention while exposing a quantitative trade-off between specialization and worst-head coverage. We derive a mixture-to-head deletion envelope, a computable upper bound on feasible token removal, and a finite-sample observer guarantee that remains valid when the pruning layer is selected adaptively. We then establish a conditional transformer perturbation bound with explicit sufficient Lipschitz constants and a first-token decision-margin corollary. A counterexample shows why shallow observations alone cannot imply an unconditional future-output guarantee. The systems analysis distinguishes query-head unions, physical page allocation, and KV-transfer payload, and gives an arithmetic break-even condition for pruning. This manuscript is theoretical in scope: it defines the procedure, its assumptions, and its formal limits, but does not report measured acceleration or task-accuracy preservation. Experiments are reserved for subsequent validation of the assumptions, approximation tightness, and end-to-end resource trade-offs.

Related

  1. Finite-Sample Guarantees for Fully Discrete Conditional Diffusion Models
    Qiuyun Zhu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Conditional stopping guarantees for a folded parametrization of reduced Stokes vectors
    Hiroyasu Usami, Ayato Tsuboi, Keisuke Hara
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlOptics & photonicsarXiv
  3. Policy iteration with discounted cost: near-optimality bounds and stability guarantees ⋆
    Jonathan de Brusse, Mathieu Granzotto, Romain Postoyan +1
    AutomaticaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlHAL
  4. Conformal Factuality Control for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation
    Muhammad Aimal Rehman, Chi-Kuang Yeh
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Synthetic Data Augmentation for Functional Data: Wasserstein Risk Bounds and Diffusion-Based Conditional Generation
    Yuhao Qi, Wenlin Dai, Xuehu Zhu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{inbasekaran2026entroprefill,
  title = {{EntroPrefill: Renyi-Guided Context Pruning with Conditional Stability Guarantees for Retrieval-Augmented Generation}},
  author = {Inbasekaran S},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.09757},
  eprint = {2610.09757},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09757},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - EntroPrefill: Renyi-Guided Context Pruning with Conditional Stability Guarantees for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
AU  - Inbasekaran S
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.09757
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09757
AB  - Mid-prefill pruning can reduce the sequence processed by deeper transformer layers, but attention concentration alone does not certify that discarded context is dispensable. We formulate EntroPrefill as a Renyi-guided proposal mechanism coupled to explicit constraints on discarded attention mass. Sink-isolated, regularized head pooling respects grouped-query attention while exposing a quantitative trade-off between specialization and worst-head coverage. We derive a mixture-to-head deletion envelope, a computable upper bound on feasible token removal, and a finite-sample observer guarantee that remains valid when the pruning layer is selected adaptively. We then establish a conditional transformer perturbation bound with explicit sufficient Lipschitz constants and a first-token decision-margin corollary. A counterexample shows why shallow observations alone cannot imply an unconditional future-output guarantee. The systems analysis distinguishes query-head unions, physical page allocation, and KV-transfer payload, and gives an arithmetic break-even condition for pruning. This manuscript is theoretical in scope: it defines the procedure, its assumptions, and its formal limits, but does not report measured acceleration or task-accuracy preservation. Experiments are reserved for subsequent validation of the assumptions, approximation tightness, and end-to-end resource trade-offs.
ER  -