Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Investigating pathways of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) contamination and transmission in intensive care units: a prospective genomic surveillance study

  1. 1University of Utah

Abstract

Background Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) species are common healthcare-associated pathogens that cause difficult-to-treat infections. Whole genome sequencing of patients has revealed a substantial burden of patient-to-patient VRE transmission in hospitals, with patients in intensive care units (ICUs) at particularly high risk of acquisition. However, few studies adequately characterize the pathways of VRE transmission between patients in acute care settings - a necessary step to identify current gaps in infection prevention practices. By harnessing genomic clustering analyses of whole genome sequences of VRE isolates from patients, environmental surfaces, and healthcare providers (HCP) in ICUs, we aim to reconstruct indirect pathways of pathogen movement to identify patterns of VRE spread and opportunities for transmission prevention. Methods and Findings We collected daily samples (N = 6848) from ICUs in two hospitals over 13 weeks from four main sampling sources: patients, HCP hands, patient rooms, and shared surfaces. Samples were cultured on selective media and sent for whole genome sequencing (WGS). We used genomic thresholds to identify clusters of related VRE isolates and distinguish unrelated isolates. VRE was detected in samples from 20 out of 322 unique occupant-stays (6.22%). VRE isolates were detected from all sampling sources except for shared surfaces. A total of 44 unique VRE isolates were identified, 43 Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) and one Enterococcus faecalis (VREf). Two distinct patterns of VREfm spread were observed: 1) an outbreak setting with observed patient-to-patient transmission and low VRE genomic heterogeneity, and 2) high VRE genomic heterogeneity and pathogen movement between occupant-stays facilitated by persistent HCP and environmental contamination, but no observed transmission events. VRE detection probabilities were not significantly different between occupant-stays in outbreak and non-outbreak settings (OR = 0.63, 95% CI (0.23, 1.83), p = 0.32). However, including VRE isolates from non-patient samples increased the number of occupant-stays with VRE detection from 6 to 20, a 3.3-fold increase, as compared to patient samples alone. Including non-patient samples also increased the number of VRE multi-isolate genomic clusters detected by 7-fold. Our findings are limited because sampling was primarily conducted in ICUs. Due to the combination of short ICU stay durations and imperfect test sensitivity, VRE transmission events may have been underdetected. Conclusions Our findings characterize the complex nature of VRE transmission pathways in ICU settings. Even without an ongoing outbreak, we found substantial evidence of VRE movement between occupant-stays, facilitated by a combination of HCP hands and environmental surfaces. This study highlights the importance of environmental sampling for understanding VRE transmission potential, which is likely to be underestimated using patient sampling alone. We recommend that future studies incorporate follow-up sampling after discharge to better understand the true burden of transmission.

Related

  1. Emergence of vancomycin-resistant and multidrug-resistant Enterococcus spp. in freshwater aquaculture systems of southeastern Nigeria: implications for one health surveillance
    Chidimma Onyinye Ikeme, Leatitia Ugochinyere Igwe, Chukwuebuka Nnamdi Onwubuariri
    Brazilian Journal of MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. Investigating Climate-Driven Disruption of Malaria Transmission Following the 2022 Sindh, Pakistan Floods: An Interrupted Time Series Study
    A. Tariq, R. Allana, S. Shah +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  3. Investigating laboratory capacity and whole genome sequencing practices to inform standardised protocols for bacterial genomic surveillance in Africa.
    C. Fortuin, L. Bolton, A. Dramowski +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textHuman geneticsmedRxiv
  4. Genomic Surveillance Reveals Clusters of Plasmodium falciparum Antimalarial Resistance Markers in Eswatini, A Low-Transmission Setting
    Nomcebo Nhlengethwa, Andrés Aranda-Díaz, Sibonakaliso Vilakati +13
    The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and HygienePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text4 citedEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  5. Minimised SARS-CoV-2 transmission during Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games: insights from enhanced integrated surveillance, Japan, July to September 2021.
    Munehisa Fukusumi, Keiko Tsukada, Kanako Otani +10
    Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletinPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{osullivan2026investigating,
  title = {{Investigating pathways of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) contamination and transmission in intensive care units: a prospective genomic surveillance study}},
  author = {T. O'Sullivan and W. D. Tanner and W. Brazelton and K. Khader and C. Haroldsen and B. Orleans and M. H. Samore and M. Rubin and L. T. Keegan},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.07.28.26359040},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.28.26359040v2},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Investigating pathways of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) contamination and transmission in intensive care units: a prospective genomic surveillance study
AU  - T. O'Sullivan
AU  - W. D. Tanner
AU  - W. Brazelton
AU  - K. Khader
AU  - C. Haroldsen
AU  - B. Orleans
AU  - M. H. Samore
AU  - M. Rubin
AU  - L. T. Keegan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/28
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.07.28.26359040
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.28.26359040v2
AB  - Background Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) species are common healthcare-associated pathogens that cause difficult-to-treat infections. Whole genome sequencing of patients has revealed a substantial burden of patient-to-patient VRE transmission in hospitals, with patients in intensive care units (ICUs) at particularly high risk of acquisition. However, few studies adequately characterize the pathways of VRE transmission between patients in acute care settings - a necessary step to identify current gaps in infection prevention practices. By harnessing genomic clustering analyses of whole genome sequences of VRE isolates from patients, environmental surfaces, and healthcare providers (HCP) in ICUs, we aim to reconstruct indirect pathways of pathogen movement to identify patterns of VRE spread and opportunities for transmission prevention. Methods and Findings We collected daily samples (N = 6848) from ICUs in two hospitals over 13 weeks from four main sampling sources: patients, HCP hands, patient rooms, and shared surfaces. Samples were cultured on selective media and sent for whole genome sequencing (WGS). We used genomic thresholds to identify clusters of related VRE isolates and distinguish unrelated isolates. VRE was detected in samples from 20 out of 322 unique occupant-stays (6.22%). VRE isolates were detected from all sampling sources except for shared surfaces. A total of 44 unique VRE isolates were identified, 43 Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) and one Enterococcus faecalis (VREf). Two distinct patterns of VREfm spread were observed: 1) an outbreak setting with observed patient-to-patient transmission and low VRE genomic heterogeneity, and 2) high VRE genomic heterogeneity and pathogen movement between occupant-stays facilitated by persistent HCP and environmental contamination, but no observed transmission events. VRE detection probabilities were not significantly different between occupant-stays in outbreak and non-outbreak settings (OR = 0.63, 95% CI (0.23, 1.83), p = 0.32). However, including VRE isolates from non-patient samples increased the number of occupant-stays with VRE detection from 6 to 20, a 3.3-fold increase, as compared to patient samples alone. Including non-patient samples also increased the number of VRE multi-isolate genomic clusters detected by 7-fold. Our findings are limited because sampling was primarily conducted in ICUs. Due to the combination of short ICU stay durations and imperfect test sensitivity, VRE transmission events may have been underdetected. Conclusions Our findings characterize the complex nature of VRE transmission pathways in ICU settings. Even without an ongoing outbreak, we found substantial evidence of VRE movement between occupant-stays, facilitated by a combination of HCP hands and environmental surfaces. This study highlights the importance of environmental sampling for understanding VRE transmission potential, which is likely to be underestimated using patient sampling alone. We recommend that future studies incorporate follow-up sampling after discharge to better understand the true burden of transmission.
ER  -