Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Finite-n Estimate of Dedekind Numbers by Layer-Ratio Monte Carlo

Abstract

Dedekind's problem counts monotone Boolean functions, equivalently downsets of a Boolean lattice. We recast this enumeration as a finite layer-ratio reconstruction problem for the Whitney numbers of the ranked ideal lattice. An exact adjacent-layer double count expresses each layer ratio through local averages of the number of addable elements and the number of removable elements. Reversible fixed-layer Markov chains estimate these averages and hence estimate the Dedekind number M(n). Backtests at M(8) and M(9) calibrate seed-level variability under the fixed protocol and measure the observed Monte Carlo budget scaling. The resulting estimate probes the Whitney-number sequence of the ideal lattice. Although these rows have previously been described empirically as unimodal, the high-precision n=9 estimate has a shallow two-shoulder feature around the central rank, contrary to that empirical description; n=11 and n=13 center-window estimates show a larger-contrast analogous pattern. The protocol estimate for M(10) is M̂(10)=(8.9360±0.0010)× 1078, where the displayed uncertainty is the budget-based forecast scale from the cross-n scaling law under the production budget.

Versions

Related

  1. Mean Values and Normal Order of a Successive-Iterate Ratio of Dedekind's Arithmetic Function
    Aimin Guo
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. The Szemerédi-Trotter Estimate in Finite Field with its Applications
    Changxing Miao, Rui Xie
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Uniform estimate of Lang-Weil type for counting points of schemes over finite rings
    Kien Huu Nguyen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Rational Points on Danielewski Surfaces over Finite fields and Polygonal Numbers
    Sakshi Gupta, Anit Kuckian, Indranath Sengupta
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Finite holomorphic pullbacks, Segre numbers, and generic Lê numbers
    Z. Jelonek, V. H. Jorge Perez, R. N. Araújo Dos Santos
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026finiten,
  title = {{Finite-n Estimate of Dedekind Numbers by Layer-Ratio Monte Carlo}},
  author = {Tian-Shun Chen and Hao Feng and Haozhe Wang and Chian-Shu Chen and Kilar Zhang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.09795},
  eprint = {2606.09795},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09795},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Finite-n Estimate of Dedekind Numbers by Layer-Ratio Monte Carlo
AU  - Tian-Shun Chen
AU  - Hao Feng
AU  - Haozhe Wang
AU  - Chian-Shu Chen
AU  - Kilar Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.09795
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09795
AB  - Dedekind's problem counts monotone Boolean functions, equivalently downsets of a Boolean lattice. We recast this enumeration as a finite layer-ratio reconstruction problem for the Whitney numbers of the ranked ideal lattice. An exact adjacent-layer double count expresses each layer ratio through local averages of the number of addable elements and the number of removable elements. Reversible fixed-layer Markov chains estimate these averages and hence estimate the Dedekind number M(n). Backtests at M(8) and M(9) calibrate seed-level variability under the fixed protocol and measure the observed Monte Carlo budget scaling. The resulting estimate probes the Whitney-number sequence of the ideal lattice. Although these rows have previously been described empirically as unimodal, the high-precision n=9 estimate has a shallow two-shoulder feature around the central rank, contrary to that empirical description; n=11 and n=13 center-window estimates show a larger-contrast analogous pattern. The protocol estimate for M(10) is M̂(10)=(8.9360±0.0010)× 10^78, where the displayed uncertainty is the budget-based forecast scale from the cross-n scaling law under the production budget.
ER  -