Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Generative AI-related employment threat, AI optimism, and employment anxiety among domestic and international students at a Chinese university

  1. 1Central South University

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping the labor market, yet it remains unclear whether students’ appraisal of AI-driven employment threat translates into employment anxiety in similar ways across cultural groups. This study administered an online questionnaire to 1,595 domestic students (1,095) and international students (500) enrolled at Central South University. Perceived AI replacement threat, AI optimism, and employment anxiety were assessed with 13 five-point Likert items. Information channels, coping behaviors, desired institutional support, and perceived coping relief were assessed as supplementary measures. Confirmatory factor analyses supported an acceptable three-factor structure in both groups. The distinction between threat and anxiety remained qualified due to their substantial association. Metric invariance was established, and partial scalar invariance was obtained after the intercept of Q21 was freed. Perceived AI replacement threat and employment anxiety remained empirically distinguishable, although their latent correlation was stronger among international students than among domestic students. In the structural model, threat was strongly associated with anxiety ( β = 0.764) and weakly associated with optimism ( β = 0.133). After threat was included, optimism showed a small negative conditional association with anxiety ( β = −0.152). The indirect association through optimism was negative but limited in magnitude, and equivalent cross-sectional specifications fit the data equally well. This pattern is best interpreted as an exploratory statistical finding compatible with suppression, rather than confirmed evidence of a directional psychological mechanism. Supplementary coping analyses were descriptive and exploratory. These findings provide qualified empirical support for a three-factor framework of students’ responses to AI-related employment uncertainty, and highlight differences in threat-anxiety coupling across student populations. The results carry implications for targeted student support services addressing AI-related career concerns.

Related

  1. Employment satisfaction among public health and preventive medicine graduates and associated factors: a cross-sectional survey at Guangxi Medical University
    Qiyini Ma, Yuyu Chen, Sijia Dai +3
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Safety awareness, attitudes, and behaviors among university students in Saudi Arabia: implications for pre-employment safety readiness.
    Mohammed Alsubaie, Sadeq Abu-Dawas, Aiman Alwadi +6
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Generative artificial intelligence–assisted medical self-care and associated factors among undergraduate students at Arsi University, South-Eastern Ethiopia
    Jibril Bashir Adem, Anas Ali Alhur
    PLOS Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  4. Engaging Employees and Employers to Better Manage Employment Risk in Clinical Trials
    Amanda M. Wilson, Benjamin S. Wilfond
    The American journal of bioethics : AJOBPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  5. Employment among women with disabilities in Somalia: evidence from the Somali integrated household budget survey 2022
    Mohamed Farah Hassan, Ahmed Mahdi Abdi
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{huang2026generative,
  title = {{Generative AI-related employment threat, AI optimism, and employment anxiety among domestic and international students at a Chinese university}},
  author = {Yongming Huang and Yuyao Hu and Chunyu Ling and Xichen Liao and Xueyong Xiang and Qiujing Pan},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1927670},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1927670/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Generative AI-related employment threat, AI optimism, and employment anxiety among domestic and international students at a Chinese university
AU  - Yongming Huang
AU  - Yuyao Hu
AU  - Chunyu Ling
AU  - Xichen Liao
AU  - Xueyong Xiang
AU  - Qiujing Pan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1927670
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1927670/full
AB  - The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping the labor market, yet it remains unclear whether students’ appraisal of AI-driven employment threat translates into employment anxiety in similar ways across cultural groups. This study administered an online questionnaire to 1,595 domestic students (1,095) and international students (500) enrolled at Central South University. Perceived AI replacement threat, AI optimism, and employment anxiety were assessed with 13 five-point Likert items. Information channels, coping behaviors, desired institutional support, and perceived coping relief were assessed as supplementary measures. Confirmatory factor analyses supported an acceptable three-factor structure in both groups. The distinction between threat and anxiety remained qualified due to their substantial association. Metric invariance was established, and partial scalar invariance was obtained after the intercept of Q21 was freed. Perceived AI replacement threat and employment anxiety remained empirically distinguishable, although their latent correlation was stronger among international students than among domestic students. In the structural model, threat was strongly associated with anxiety ( β = 0.764) and weakly associated with optimism ( β = 0.133). After threat was included, optimism showed a small negative conditional association with anxiety ( β = −0.152). The indirect association through optimism was negative but limited in magnitude, and equivalent cross-sectional specifications fit the data equally well. This pattern is best interpreted as an exploratory statistical finding compatible with suppression, rather than confirmed evidence of a directional psychological mechanism. Supplementary coping analyses were descriptive and exploratory. These findings provide qualified empirical support for a three-factor framework of students’ responses to AI-related employment uncertainty, and highlight differences in threat-anxiety coupling across student populations. The results carry implications for targeted student support services addressing AI-related career concerns.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -