The effect of the consumption of toxic prey on avian predator physiology
- 1Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyvaskyla
Abstract
Many insects sequester plant toxic metabolites as a chemical defence against predators. Predators are predicted to include chemically defended prey in their diet if the benefits of gaining nutrients outweigh the costs of ingesting toxins. However, the physiological costs associated with the consumption of prey toxins remain largely unknown, especially when using ecologically relevant predators and naturally occurring levels of toxins. Here, we investigated whether the consumption of chemically-defended wood tiger moths (Arctia plantaginis) influences the physiological state of an avian predator, the great tit (Parus major). We manipulated the moth toxicity by first rearing the larvae in two different diets that varied in pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA) content, and then manually extracting part of the defensive secretions from half of the moths in both diet groups. This led to four treatments with different moth PA profiles, which were fed to great tits for six consecutive days. After the bird diet manipulation, we collected fecal and blood samples for various physiological analyses of stress and metabolism. We found no significant effects of PA consumption on corticosterone or serotonin concentrations, nor on oxidative stress biomarkers. However, birds exposed to higher PA doses used more of their mitochondrial maximal capacity, which might result from increased metabolic stress. Overall, our results suggest that incorporating some PA-defended insects in the diet does not incur high physiological costs to avian predators, but further studies are needed to explore the costs of consuming a higher number of defended prey and the interactive effects of different prey toxins.
Related
- Green Leaves, Red Flags: Host Plant Associations as Indicators of Prey Defense for an Avian Predator
- Molecular Screening for Potential Resistance to Toxic Invasive Prey: Implications for Island Conservation
- Tracking human foragers and their prey reveals adaptive predator-prey dynamics
- Dynamics of a Harvested Predator-Prey Model with a Generalized Holling Type~III Response Capturing Group Defense
- Predator self limitation controls pattern formation in a predator prey system with additional food: a Turing Hopf analysis
BibTeX
@misc{carrillo2026effect,
title = {{The effect of the consumption of toxic prey on avian predator physiology}},
author = {O. Garcia Carrillo and E. Minoza and C. J. Irving and S. Ruuskanen and H. Pakkanen and L. Hamalainen},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.14.759177},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.759177v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The effect of the consumption of toxic prey on avian predator physiology
AU - O. Garcia Carrillo
AU - E. Minoza
AU - C. J. Irving
AU - S. Ruuskanen
AU - H. Pakkanen
AU - L. Hamalainen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.14.759177
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.759177v1
AB - Many insects sequester plant toxic metabolites as a chemical defence against predators. Predators are predicted to include chemically defended prey in their diet if the benefits of gaining nutrients outweigh the costs of ingesting toxins. However, the physiological costs associated with the consumption of prey toxins remain largely unknown, especially when using ecologically relevant predators and naturally occurring levels of toxins. Here, we investigated whether the consumption of chemically-defended wood tiger moths (Arctia plantaginis) influences the physiological state of an avian predator, the great tit (Parus major). We manipulated the moth toxicity by first rearing the larvae in two different diets that varied in pyrrolizidine alkaloid (PA) content, and then manually extracting part of the defensive secretions from half of the moths in both diet groups. This led to four treatments with different moth PA profiles, which were fed to great tits for six consecutive days. After the bird diet manipulation, we collected fecal and blood samples for various physiological analyses of stress and metabolism. We found no significant effects of PA consumption on corticosterone or serotonin concentrations, nor on oxidative stress biomarkers. However, birds exposed to higher PA doses used more of their mitochondrial maximal capacity, which might result from increased metabolic stress. Overall, our results suggest that incorporating some PA-defended insects in the diet does not incur high physiological costs to avian predators, but further studies are needed to explore the costs of consuming a higher number of defended prey and the interactive effects of different prey toxins.
ER -