Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJMIR Research Protocols

Realist Collaborative Evaluation of a Work Disability Prevention Program for Breast Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a RECOVA-FASTRACS Realist Evaluation

Abstract

Background: Women with breast cancer face many barriers to returning to work (RTW) after their treatment. The Facilitating and Sustaining the Return to Work After Breast Cancer (FASTRACS) intervention aims to facilitate and sustain functional RTW. Objective: The main objective of the RECOVA-FASTRACS (Realist Collaborative Evaluation of a Work Disability Prevention Program for Breast Cancer Survivors) study is to evaluate the processes using a realist approach that analyzes what works, how, for whom, and under what circumstances. Methods: The RECOVA-FASTRACS study uses a mixed methods design to assess the implementation, context, and impact mechanisms of the FASTRACS intervention. The qualitative analysis will include 2 main components: a trajectory analysis and a focus group assessment. The trajectory analysis will examine the experiences of women who participated in the intervention and key individuals involved in their RTW process. We will use semistructured interviews according to the multiple-case study method. Additionally, to explore organizational and professional practices, focus groups will be conducted with professionals who deliver the intervention. To analyze the trajectories, embedded and iterative integration will combine the qualitative findings with relevant quantitative data from the FASTRACS randomized controlled trial for 5 domains: personal situation, professional situation, RTW, care pathway, intervention tool use, and perceived usefulness. Results: The RECOVA-FASTRACS study received funding in 2022. Recruitment and qualitative data collection began in month 6. Final analyses are expected to be completed by the end of 2026, with dissemination of the main findings anticipated in late 2027. Conclusions: Our mixed methods realist evaluation will provide a detailed analysis of the intervention processes, helping to identify impact mechanisms within specific contexts. This approach is meant to ensure a more informed and realist deployment of the intervention by professionals following the study.

Related

  1. Functional acuity score as a surrogate of reading performance in low vision: A Japanese disability evaluation cohort study
    Mieko Tsuruoka, Kenji Inoue
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeuroscienceStatisticsPLOS
  2. Evaluation of the collaborative process of public-private partnerships in the veterinary domain: The case of the sanitary mandate in Tunisia
    Anissa Dhaoui, Mariline Poupaud, Salma Zargouni +3
    Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyHAL
  3. An LLM-based decision aid for collaborative decision-making in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A multimethod evaluation
    Antonia Barbaric, Susanne M Benseler, Chitra Lalloo +7
    PLOS Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurosciencePLOSEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Development and pharmacological evaluation of an intranasal liposomal norbinaltorphimine formulation for the prevention of pain-induced negative affect
    J. D. Lorente, Y. Campos-Jurado, M. Martinez-Navarrete +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Preliminary Evaluation of Two iiPCR Platforms for Qualitative Field Detection of Cannabis sativa
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{blazer2026realist,
  title = {{Realist Collaborative Evaluation of a Work Disability Prevention Program for Breast Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a RECOVA-FASTRACS Realist Evaluation}},
  author = {Apolline Blazer and Sabrina Rouat and Laure Guittard and Pauline Drouin and Julien Péron and Béatrice Fervers and Julien Carretier and Guillaume Broc and Laurent Letrilliart and Jean-Baptiste Fassier and Marion Lamort-Bouché},
  journal = {JMIR Research Protocols},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.2196/86608},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05750692v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Realist Collaborative Evaluation of a Work Disability Prevention Program for Breast Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a RECOVA-FASTRACS Realist Evaluation
AU  - Apolline Blazer
AU  - Sabrina Rouat
AU  - Laure Guittard
AU  - Pauline Drouin
AU  - Julien Péron
AU  - Béatrice Fervers
AU  - Julien Carretier
AU  - Guillaume Broc
AU  - Laurent Letrilliart
AU  - Jean-Baptiste Fassier
AU  - Marion Lamort-Bouché
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/28
JO  - JMIR Research Protocols
DO  - 10.2196/86608
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05750692v1
AB  - Background: Women with breast cancer face many barriers to returning to work (RTW) after their treatment. The Facilitating and Sustaining the Return to Work After Breast Cancer (FASTRACS) intervention aims to facilitate and sustain functional RTW. Objective: The main objective of the RECOVA-FASTRACS (Realist Collaborative Evaluation of a Work Disability Prevention Program for Breast Cancer Survivors) study is to evaluate the processes using a realist approach that analyzes what works, how, for whom, and under what circumstances. Methods: The RECOVA-FASTRACS study uses a mixed methods design to assess the implementation, context, and impact mechanisms of the FASTRACS intervention. The qualitative analysis will include 2 main components: a trajectory analysis and a focus group assessment. The trajectory analysis will examine the experiences of women who participated in the intervention and key individuals involved in their RTW process. We will use semistructured interviews according to the multiple-case study method. Additionally, to explore organizational and professional practices, focus groups will be conducted with professionals who deliver the intervention. To analyze the trajectories, embedded and iterative integration will combine the qualitative findings with relevant quantitative data from the FASTRACS randomized controlled trial for 5 domains: personal situation, professional situation, RTW, care pathway, intervention tool use, and perceived usefulness. Results: The RECOVA-FASTRACS study received funding in 2022. Recruitment and qualitative data collection began in month 6. Final analyses are expected to be completed by the end of 2026, with dissemination of the main findings anticipated in late 2027. Conclusions: Our mixed methods realist evaluation will provide a detailed analysis of the intervention processes, helping to identify impact mechanisms within specific contexts. This approach is meant to ensure a more informed and realist deployment of the intervention by professionals following the study.
SN  - 1929-0748
ER  -